2019 Honda Passport

Rating overview
Evaluation criteria	Rating
Small overlap front: driver-side
Small overlap front: passenger-side
Moderate overlap front: original test
Side: original test
Side: updated test
Roof strength
Head restraints & seats

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Headlights (varies by trim/option)
Front crash prevention: vehicle-to-vehicle
Standard system	Advanced

Evaluation criteria	Rating
LATCH ease of use

Small overlap front: driver-side

Rating applies to 2019-25 models

Tested vehicle: 2016 Honda Pilot EX 4-door 4wd

The Honda Pilot was redesigned for the 2016 model year, and the Honda Passport was introduced in the 2019 model year. The Passport is derived from the Pilot, but it has a slightly shorter overall length and only two rows of seats instead of three. Ratings apply to both the Pilot and Passport.

Evaluation criteria	Rating

Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Hip/thigh
Lower leg/foot
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics

Action shot taken during the driver-side small overlap frontal crash test.

The dummy's position in relation to the door frame, steering wheel, and instrument panel after the crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was maintained well.

The frontal and side curtain airbags worked well together to keep the head from coming close to any stiff structure or outside objects that could cause injury.

The driver's space was maintained well, and risk of injuries to the dummy's legs and feet was low.

Technical measurements for this test

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	CEN1521
Lower occupant compartment
Lower hinge pillar max (cm)	4
Footrest (cm)	8
Left toepan (cm)	7
Brake pedal (cm)	5
Parking brake (cm)	10
Rocker panel lateral average (cm)	2
Upper occupant compartment
Steering column	0
Upper hinge pillar max (cm)	3
Upper dash (cm)	4
Lower instrument panel (cm)	4

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	CEN1521
Head
HIC-15	243
Peak gs at hard contact	no contact
Neck
Tension (kN)	1.2
Extension bending moment (Nm)	17
Maximum Nij	0.30
Chest maximum compression (mm)	24
Femur (kN)
Left	0.1
Right	0.5
Knee displacement (mm)
Left	0
Right	3
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left	0
Right	0
Maximum tibia index
Left	0.41
Right	0.41
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left	1.8
Right	1.5
Foot acceleration (g)
Left	80
Right	62

About the small overlap front test

Small overlap front: passenger-side

Rating applies to 2019-25 models

Tested vehicle: 2018 Honda Pilot EX 4-door 4wd

The Honda Pilot was redesigned for the 2016 model year, and the Honda Passport was introduced in the 2019 model year. The Passport is derived from the Pilot, but it has a slightly shorter overall length and only two rows of seats instead of three. Ratings apply to both the Pilot and Passport.

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Passenger injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Hip/thigh
Lower leg/foot
Passenger restraints and dummy kinematics The dummy’s head barely contacted the frontal airbag before sliding off the right side, allowing the head to move far enough forward to hit the dashboard. The side curtain airbag deployed and has sufficient forward coverage to protect the head from contact with side structure and outside objects. The side torso airbag also deployed.
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Hip/thigh
Lower leg/foot
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics

Action shot taken during the passenger-side small overlap frontal crash test.

The dummy's position in relation to the door frame and dashboard after the crash test indicates that the passenger’s survival space was maintained well.

The dummy’s head slid off the right side of the frontal airbag and moved far enough forward to hit the dashboard hard.

Forces on the right lower leg were high enough to indicate a moderate risk of injury.

Technical measurements for this test

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	CEP1808
Lower occupant compartment
Lower hinge pillar max (cm)	5
Footrest (cm)	11
Right toepan (cm)	7
Center toepan (cm)	4
Rocker panel lateral average (cm)	3
Upper occupant compartment
Center dash (cm)	5
Upper hinge pillar max (cm)	4
Upper dash (cm)	6
Right lower dash (cm)	5

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	CEP1808
Head
HIC-15	444
Peak gs at hard contact	77
Neck
Tension (kN)	1.3
Extension bending moment (Nm)	17
Maximum Nij	0.22
Chest maximum compression (mm)	16
Femur (kN)
Left	0.7
Right	2.0
Knee displacement (mm)
Left	4
Right	8
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left	0
Right	0
Maximum tibia index
Left	0.35
Right	0.85
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left	0.9
Right	1.4
Foot acceleration (g)
Left	87
Right	30

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	CEP1808
Head
HIC-15	65
Peak gs at hard contact	no contact
Neck
Tension (kN)	0.8
Extension bending moment (Nm)	10
Maximum Nij	0.19
Chest maximum compression (mm)	26
Femur (kN)
Left	0.1
Right	0.1
Knee displacement (mm)
Left	0
Right	0
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left	0
Right	0
Maximum tibia index
Left	0.47
Right	0.18
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left	0.3
Right	0.7
Foot acceleration (g)
Left	53
Right	56

About the small overlap front test

Moderate overlap front: original test

Rating applies to 2019-25 models

Tested vehicle: 2016 Honda Pilot Touring 4-door 4wd

The Honda Pilot was redesigned for the 2016 model year. Moderate overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Honda. The ratings also apply to the Honda Passport, introduced in the 2019 model year. The Passport is derived from the Pilot, but it has a slightly shorter overall length and only two rows of seats instead of three.

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Leg/foot, left
Leg/foot, right
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics

Technical measurements for this test

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	VTF1501
Footwell intrusion
Footrest (cm)	2
Left (cm)	3
Center (cm)	3
Right (cm)	4
Brake pedal (cm)	9
Instrument panel rearward movement
Left (cm)	0
Right (cm)	0
Steering column movement
Upward (cm)	1
Rearward (cm)	-5
A-pillar rearward movement (cm)	0

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	VTF1501
Head
HIC-15	145
Peak gs at hard contact	no contact
Neck
Tension (kN)	0.9
Extension bending moment (Nm)	46
Maximum Nij	0.24
Chest maximum compression (mm)	25
Legs
Femur force - left (kN)	0.2
Femur force - right (kN)	0.2
Knee displacement - left (mm)	0
Knee displacement - right (mm)	0
Maximum tibia index - left	0.46
Maximum tibia index - right	0.48
Tibia axial force - left (kN)	1.4
Tibia axial force - right (kN)	1.3
Foot acceleration (g)
Left	61
Right	97

About the original moderate overlap front test

Side: original test

Rating applies to 2019-25 models

Tested vehicle: 2016 Honda Pilot Touring 4-door 4wd

The Honda Pilot was redesigned for the 2016 model year. Side ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Honda. The ratings also apply to the Honda Passport, introduced in the 2019 model year. The Passport is derived from the Pilot, but it has a slightly shorter overall length and only two rows of seats instead of three.

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Torso
Pelvis/leg
Driver head protection
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck
Torso
Pelvis/leg
Rear passenger head protection

Technical measurements for this test

Test ID	VTS1501
B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver's seat (cm)	-17.5
Negative numbers indicate the amount by which the crush stopped short of the seat centerline.

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	VTS1501
Head HIC-15	147
Neck
Tension (kN)	0.7
Compression (kN)	0.4
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm)	28
Lateral force (kN)	1.4
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm)	26
Average deflection (mm)	23
Maximum deflection rate (m/s)	2.27
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s)	0.25
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN)	2.8
Acetabulum force (kN)	0.9
Combined force (kN)	3.3
Left femur
L-M force (kN)	0.4
L-M moment (Nm)	37
A-P moment (Nm)	-22

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	VTS1501
Head HIC-15	122
Neck
Tension (kN)	0.6
Compression (kN)	0.1
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm)	34
Lateral force (kN)	2.0
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm)	38
Average deflection (mm)	29
Maximum deflection rate (m/s)	3.62
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s)	0.61
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN)	0.1
Acetabulum force (kN)	1.7
Combined force (kN)	1.7
Left femur
L-M force (kN)	1.1
L-M moment (Nm)	111
A-P moment (Nm)	19

About the original side crash test

Side: updated test

Rating applies to 2019-25 models

Tested vehicle: 2022 Honda Pilot EX-L 4-door 4wd

The Honda Pilot was redesigned for the 2016 model year. The ratings also apply to the Honda Passport, introduced in the 2019 model year. The Passport is derived from the Pilot, but it has a slightly shorter overall length and only two rows of seats instead of three.

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Torso
Pelvis
Driver head protection
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck
Torso
Pelvis
Rear passenger head protection

View of the vehicle just after the crash test.

View of the vehicle after the crash with doors removed, showing the side airbags and damage to the occupant compartment.

Smeared greasepaint shows where the driver dummy's head was protected from being hit by hard structures by the side airbags.

Smeared greasepaint shows where the rear passenger dummy’s head was protected by the side airbag.

Technical measurements for this test

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	CES2205
B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver's seat (cm)	-12.5
Negative numbers indicate the amount by which the crush stopped short of the seat centerline.

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	CES2205
Head
HIC-15	206
Peak gs at hard contact	no contact
Neck
Tension (kN)	1.5
Compression (kN)	0.0
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm)	17
Lateral force (kN)	0.4
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm)	31
Average deflection (mm)	27
Maximum deflection rate (m/s)	2.41
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s)	0.42
Pelvis
Combined force (kN)	6.0

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	CES2205
Head
HIC-15	206
Peak gs at hard contact	no contact
Neck
Tension (kN)	0.8
Compression (kN)	0.3
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm)	24
Lateral force (kN)	1.5
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm)	52
Average deflection (mm)	35
Maximum deflection rate (m/s)	5.33
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s)	0.86
Pelvis
Combined force (kN)	3.4

About the side crash test

Roof strength

Rating applies to 2019-23 models

Tested vehicle: 2016 Honda Pilot EX 4-door 2wd

Curb weight from 2016 Honda Pilot EX 4-door 4wd. Rating applies to the Honda Pilot and the structurally similar Honda Passport.

Overall evaluation
Curb weight	4,219 lbs
Peak force	22,025 lbs
Strength-to-weight ratio	5.22

About the roof strength test

Head restraints & seats

Seat type: Power cloth seat

Overall evaluation
Dynamic rating
Seat/head restraint geometry

Technical measurements for this test

Seat type	Power cloth seat
Geometry
Backset (mm)	50
Distance below top of head (mm)	35
Seat design parameters
Pass/fail	Pass
Max T1 acceleration (g)	13.0
Head contact time (ms)	67
Force rating	1
Neck forces
Max neck shear force (N)	0
Max neck tension (N)	470

About the head restraint & seat test
Currently, IIHS tests apply only to front seats.

Headlights

Ratings are given for 4 different headlight variations available on this vehicle.

Trim level(s)

Elite trim; built after June 2019
Touring trim; built after June 2019

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Low-beam headlight type	LED reflector
High-beam headlight type	LED reflector
Curve-adaptive?	No
High-beam assist?	Yes
Overall rating
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination:

Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the right side of the road and fair on the left side. On curves, visibility was good on the sharp right curve, fair on the gradual right and sharp left curves, and inadequate on the gradual left curve.

The low beams never exceeded glare limits.

High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the right side of the road and fair on the left side. On curves, visibility was fair in all 4 tests.

High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on the straightaway and all 4 curves.

Technical measurements for this test

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Trim level(s)	Elite trim Touring trim
Low-beam headlight type	LED reflector
High-beam headlight type	LED reflector
Curve-adaptive?	No
High-beam assist?	Yes
Overall rating Applies to 2019-21 models built after June 2019

LOW BEAMS	Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)	Amount glare exceeded threshold
Straightaway right edge	95.3 m	None
Straightaway left edge	51.1 m	None
250m radius right curve, right edge	59.2 m	None
250m radius left curve, left edge	49.4 m	None
150m radius right curve, right edge	55.6 m	None
150m radius left curve, right edge	48.7 m	None

HIGH BEAMS	Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)
Straightaway right edge	162.3 m
Straightaway left edge	139.6 m
250m radius right curve, right edge	73.5 m
250m radius left curve, left edge	73.2 m
150m radius right curve, right edge	59.3 m
150m radius left curve, left edge	57.7 m

Trim level(s)

Sport trim; built after June 2019
EX-L trim; built after June 2019

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Low-beam headlight type	LED projector
High-beam headlight type	Halogen reflector
Curve-adaptive?	No
High-beam assist?	Yes
Overall rating
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination:

Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the right side of the road and fair on the left side. On curves, visibility was fair on the sharp left and both right curves and inadequate on the gradual left curve.

The low beams never exceeded glare limits.

High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the right side of the road and inadequate on the left side. On curves, visibility was fair on the sharp left and both right curves and inadequate on the gradual left curve.

High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on the straightaway, on both left curves and on both right curves.

Technical measurements for this test

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Trim level(s)	Sport trim EX-L trim
Low-beam headlight type	LED projector
High-beam headlight type	Halogen reflector
Curve-adaptive?	No
High-beam assist?	Yes
Overall rating Applies to 2019-21 models built after June 2019

LOW BEAMS	Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)	Amount glare exceeded threshold
Straightaway right edge	104.6 m	None
Straightaway left edge	52.2 m	None
250m radius right curve, right edge	64.9 m	None
250m radius left curve, right edge	49.3 m	None
150m radius right curve, right edge	51.7 m	None
150m radius left curve, left edge	48.9 m	None

HIGH BEAMS	Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)
Straightaway right edge	153.3 m
Straightaway left edge	104.2 m
250m radius right curve, right edge	72.7 m
250m radius left curve, left edge	64.9 m
150m radius right curve, right edge	55.9 m
150m radius left curve, left edge	55.1 m

Trim level(s)

Elite trim; built before July 2019
Touring trim; built before July 2019

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Low-beam headlight type	LED reflector
High-beam headlight type	LED reflector
Curve-adaptive?	No
High-beam assist?	Yes
Overall rating
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination:

Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was good on the sharp left and both right curves and fair on the gradual left curve.

The low beams created excessive glare.

High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was good on the gradual left and both right curves and fair on the sharp left curve.

High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on both left curves.

Technical measurements for this test

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Trim level(s)	Elite trim Touring trim
Low-beam headlight type	LED reflector
High-beam headlight type	LED reflector
Curve-adaptive?	No
High-beam assist?	Yes
Overall rating Applies to 2019 models built before July 2019

LOW BEAMS	Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)	Amount glare exceeded threshold
Straightaway right edge	116.8 m	70.8%
Straightaway left edge	62.0 m	70.8%
250m radius right curve, right edge	74.8 m	74.9%
250m radius left curve, right edge	62.3 m	43.2%
150m radius right curve, right edge	67.1 m	78.1%
150m radius left curve, left edge	59.3 m	34.3%

HIGH BEAMS	Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)
Straightaway right edge	183.1 m
Straightaway left edge	146.1 m
250m radius right curve, right edge	88.0 m
250m radius left curve, left edge	80.6 m
150m radius right curve, right edge	69.1 m
150m radius left curve, left edge	62.0 m

Trim level(s)

Sport trim; built before July 2019
EX-L trim; built before July 2019

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Low-beam headlight type	LED projector
High-beam headlight type	Halogen reflector
Curve-adaptive?	No
High-beam assist?	Yes
Overall rating
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination:

Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was good on the gradual right curve and fair on the sharp right and both left curves.

The low beams created excessive glare.

High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the right side of the road and inadequate on the left side. On curves, visibility was good on the gradual right curve and fair on the sharp right and both left curves.

High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on both left curves and on both right curves.

Technical measurements for this test

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Trim level(s)	Sport trim EX-L trim
Low-beam headlight type	LED projector
High-beam headlight type	Halogen reflector
Curve-adaptive?	No
High-beam assist?	Yes
Overall rating Applies to 2019 models built before July 2019

LOW BEAMS	Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)	Amount glare exceeded threshold
Straightaway right edge	114.8 m	110.3%
Straightaway left edge	69.4 m	110.3%
250m radius right curve, right edge	67.1 m	81.1%
250m radius left curve, left edge	60.2 m	16.1%
150m radius right curve, right edge	53.5 m	134.0%
150m radius left curve, left edge	53.7 m	32.5%

HIGH BEAMS	Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)
Straightaway right edge	154.5 m
Straightaway left edge	123.3 m
250m radius right curve, right edge	75.4 m
250m radius left curve, left edge	74.4 m
150m radius right curve, right edge	57.0 m
150m radius left curve, left edge	59.3 m

About the headlight evaluation

Front crash prevention: vehicle-to-vehicle

System details

Standard Collision Mitigation Braking System

Package name

Standard Honda Sensing Package

Overall evaluation

Applies to 2019-21 models

Advanced

This system does not meet the requirements for forward collision warning.
In the 12 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision.
In the 25 mph test, impact speed was reduced by 12 mph.

About the original front crash prevention test

Child seat anchors

Rating applies to 2019-25 models

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Overall evaluation
Vehicle trim	EX-L
Seat type	leather

This vehicle has 3 rear seating positions with complete child seat attachment (LATCH) hardware.

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Overall evaluation
Vehicle trim	EX-L
Seat type	leather

Rating icon	Rating
G	Good
A	Acceptable
M	Marginal
P	Poor
	Seating positions that rely on borrowed lower anchors or have only a tether anchor available are not rated.
thether anchor symbol	Tether anchor
lower anchor symbol	Lower anchors
shared lower achors symbol	Lower anchor(s) can be borrowed from adjacent positions(s)
	No hardware available

Details by seating position

Position	Rating
1
1	Tether anchor
	hard-to-find location
	no other hardware could be confused for anchor
	Lower anchors
	too deep in seat
	not too much force needed to attach
	easy to maneuver around anchors
2
2	Tether anchor
	hard-to-find location
	no other hardware could be confused for anchor
	Lower anchors
	too deep in seat
	not too much force needed to attach
	difficult to maneuver around anchors
3
3	Tether anchor
	hard-to-find location
	no other hardware could be confused for anchor
	Lower anchors
	too deep in seat
	not too much force needed to attach
	easy to maneuver around anchors

Technical measurements for this test

Lower anchor A
Open access rated	No
Depth (cm)	2-4
Force (lbs)	22
Clearance angle (degrees)	71
Lower anchor B
Open access rated	No
Depth (cm)	2-4
Force (lbs)	21
Clearance angle (degrees)	71
Tether anchor
Location	Other
Confusing hardware present	Yes
Has contrasting label within 3 inches of tether anchor	Yes
Tether anchors can be accessed while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH	Not measured

Lower anchor A
Open access rated	No
Depth (cm)	2-4
Force (lbs)	19
Clearance angle (degrees)	68
Lower anchor B
Open access rated	No
Depth (cm)	2-4
Force (lbs)	22
Clearance angle (degrees)	48
Tether anchor
Location	Other
Confusing hardware present	Yes
Has contrasting label within 3 inches of tether anchor	Yes
Tether anchors can be accessed while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH	Not measured

Lower anchor A
Open access rated	No
Depth (cm)	2-4
Force (lbs)	19
Clearance angle (degrees)	79
Lower anchor B
Open access rated	No
Depth (cm)	0-2
Force (lbs)	16
Clearance angle (degrees)	75
Tether anchor
Location	Other
Confusing hardware present	Yes
Has contrasting label within 3 inches of tether anchor	Yes
Tether anchors can be accessed while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH	Not measured

About the child seat anchor evaluation

2019 Honda Passport

midsize SUV / 4-door SUV

Crashworthiness

Crash avoidance & mitigation

Seat belts & child restraints

Other available safety features

Small overlap front: driver-side

Small overlap front: passenger-side

Moderate overlap front: original test

Side: original test

Side: updated test

Roof strength

Head restraints & seats

Headlights

Trim level(s)

Trim level(s)

Trim level(s)

Trim level(s)

Front crash prevention: vehicle-to-vehicle

System details

Package name

Overall evaluation

Child seat anchors