2025 Mazda CX-5

small SUV / 4-door SUV

2025 Mazda CX-5 4-door SUV
2023 Mazda CX-5 shown

Crashworthiness

Rating overview
Small overlap front
Moderate overlap front: updated test
Side: updated test

Crash avoidance & mitigation

Headlights (varies by trim/option)
Front crash prevention: vehicle-to-vehicle 2.0
Standard system
Front crash prevention: pedestrian (day)
Standard system
Advanced

Seat belts & child restraints

Seat belt reminders
LATCH ease of use

Key

  • G
    Good
  • A
    Acceptable
  • M
    Marginal
  • P
    Poor
  • Superior
  • Advanced
  • Basic

Some ratings use a scale of Poor to Good. Others range from Basic to Superior.

Small overlap front

The small overlap front evaluation consists of a driver-side and a passenger-side component. If the results of the two evaluations differ, then the combined small overlap rating is equal to the lower rating.

Driver-side

  • Rating applies to 2017-25 models

Tested vehicle: 2017 Mazda CX-5 Touring 4-door 4wd

The Mazda CX-5 was redesigned for the 2017 model year. Driver-side small overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Mazda.

Overall driver-side evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Hip/thigh
Lower leg/foot
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics
Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test ID VTN1706
Lower occupant compartment
Lower hinge pillar max (cm) 4
Footrest (cm) 6
Left toepan (cm) 4
Brake pedal (cm) 6
Parking brake (cm)
Rocker panel lateral average (cm) 1
Upper occupant compartment
Steering column 1
Upper hinge pillar max (cm) 4
Upper dash (cm) 5
Lower instrument panel (cm) 6

Driver injury measures

Test ID VTN1706
Head
HIC-15 195
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 1.5
Extension bending moment (Nm) 19
Maximum Nij 0.27
Chest maximum compression (mm) 24
Femur (kN)
Left 0.7
Right 0.3
Knee displacement (mm)
Left 0
Right 3
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left 0
Right 0
Maximum tibia index
Left 0.55
Right 0.40
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left 2.1
Right 1.9
Foot acceleration (g)
Left 53
Right 57

Passenger-side

  • Rating applies to 2017-25 models

Tested vehicle: 2017 Mazda CX-5 Sport 4-door 4wd

The Mazda CX-5 was redesigned for the 2017 model year. Passenger-side small overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Mazda.

Overall passenger-side evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Passenger injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Hip/thigh
Lower leg/foot
Passenger restraints and dummy kinematics
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Hip/thigh
Lower leg/foot
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics
Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on passenger side

Test ID VTP1719
Lower occupant compartment
Lower hinge pillar max (cm) 8
Footrest (cm) 9
Right toepan (cm) 7
Center toepan (cm) 2
Rocker panel lateral average (cm) 1
Upper occupant compartment
Center dash (cm) 4
Upper hinge pillar max (cm) 6
Upper dash (cm) 6
Right lower dash (cm) 6

Passenger injury measures

Test ID VTP1719
Head
HIC-15 262
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 0.8
Extension bending moment (Nm) 30
Maximum Nij 0.21
Chest maximum compression (mm) 19
Femur (kN)
Left 1.4
Right 1.9
Knee displacement (mm)
Left 0
Right 3
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left 1
Right 2
Maximum tibia index
Left 0.37
Right 0.59
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left 2.8
Right 2.8
Foot acceleration (g)
Left 50
Right 56

Driver injury measures

Test ID VTP1719
Head
HIC-15 70
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 0.9
Extension bending moment (Nm) 18
Maximum Nij 0.26
Chest maximum compression (mm) 32
Femur (kN)
Left 0.3
Right 0.3
Knee displacement (mm)
Left 2
Right 1
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left 0
Right 0
Maximum tibia index
Left 0.31
Right 0.31
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left 0.3
Right 1.2
Foot acceleration (g)
Left 71
Right 38

About the small overlap front test

Moderate overlap front: updated test

Rating applies to 2023-25 models

Tested vehicle: 2024 Mazda CX-5 2.5 Select 4-door 4wd

The Mazda CX-5 was redesigned for the 2017 model year. Beginning with 2023 models, rear seatbelt load limiters and pre-tensioners were added to improve rear occupant protection in moderate overlap frontal crashes.

Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Thigh/hip
Leg/foot
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Thigh
Rear passenger restraints and dummy kinematics

View of the vehicle after the crash showing the airbags and damage to the occupant compartment.

The rear passenger dummy's head approached the front seatback, which increases the risk of head injuries.

Rear passenger dummy injury values indicate a low risk of injury to the head or neck and chest. During the crash, the shoulder belt remained in an ideal position on the dummy’s chest.

The rear passenger dummy's lap belt remained in the ideal position on the pelvis.

Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test ID CEF2420
Footwell intrusion
Footrest (cm) 1
Left (cm) 3
Center (cm) 5
Right (cm) 6
Brake pedal (cm) 2
Instrument panel rearward movement
Left (cm) -2
Right (cm) -2
Steering column movement
Upward (cm) -1
Rearward (cm) 0
A-pillar rearward movement (cm) 0

Driver injury measures

Test ID CEF2420
Head
HIC-15 111
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 1.2
Extension bending moment (Nm) 14
Maximum Nij 0.26
Chest maximum compression (mm) 30
Femur (kN)
Left 0.3
Right 0.3
Knee displacement (mm)
Left 1
Right 1
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left no data
Right 0
Maximum tibia index
Left 0.35
Right 0.49
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left 1.7
Right 1.0
Foot acceleration (g)
Left 48
Right 68

Rear passenger injury measures

Test ID CEF2420
Head
HIC-15 for head contact during forward excursion
no contact
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 1.8
Compression (kN) 0.5
Maximum Nij for head contact during forward excursion
no contact
Chest
Chest index 32
Shoulder belt tension (kN) 3.9
Thigh (kN)
Left femur compression 0.1
Right femur compression 0.2

About the moderate overlap front test

February 2024 adjustment to rating criteria

Side: updated test

Rating applies to 2017-25 models

Tested vehicle: 2021 Mazda CX-5 Sport 4-door 4wd

The Mazda CX-5 was redesigned for the 2017 model year. Two tests of 2021 CX-5 models were conducted. The injury ratings for the rear passenger are based on just the second test; measures for the rear passenger in the first test were not obtained because the dummy's arm stub dropped out of position just before the crash. The injury ratings for the driver and the structural ratings are based on both tests.

Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Torso
Pelvis
Driver head protection
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck
Torso
Pelvis
Rear passenger head protection

View of the vehicle just after the second of two crash tests.

View of the vehicle after the second crash with doors removed, showing the side airbags and damage to the occupant compartment.

Smeared greasepaint shows where the driver dummy's head was protected from being hit by hard structures by the side airbags in the second test.

Smeared greasepaint shows where the rear passenger dummy’s head was protected by the side airbag in the second test.

Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test ID CES2007 CES2108
B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver's seat (cm) -17.0 -19.0
Negative numbers indicate the amount by which the crush stopped short of the seat centerline.

Driver injury measures

Test ID CES2007 CES2108
Head
HIC-15 165 155
Peak gs at hard contact no contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 1.0 1.0
Compression (kN) 0.2 0.2
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm) 13 13
Lateral force (kN) 1.0 0.9
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm) 41 34
Average deflection (mm) 35 28
Maximum deflection rate (m/s) 2.34 2.72
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) 0.46 0.46
Pelvis
Combined force (kN) 3.9 3.8

Passenger injury measures

Test ID CES2108
Head
HIC-15 307
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 0.1
Compression (kN) 1.1
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm) 36
Lateral force (kN) 1.9
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm) 32
Average deflection (mm) 28
Maximum deflection rate (m/s) 4.13
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) 0.42
Pelvis
Combined force (kN) 2.7

About the side crash test

Headlights

Ratings are given for 2 different headlight variations available on this vehicle.

Trim level(s)

  • 2.5 S Premium Plus trim
  • 2.5 Turbo Signature trim
  • 2.5 Carbon Turbo trim
  • 2.5 Turbo Premium trim
Low-beam headlight typeLED projector
High-beam headlight typeLED projector
Curve-adaptive?Yes
High-beam assist?Yes
Overall rating
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination:
car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler 0 ft 100 ft 200 ft 300 ft 400 ft 500 ft 600 ft Low beams Optimal low-beam illumination High beams Optimal high-beam illumination High-beam assist credit Some glare

Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the right side of the road and fair on the left side. On curves, visibility was good on the sharp left and both right curves and fair on the gradual left curve.

The low beams created some glare.

High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was fair on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was good on the gradual left and gradual right curves and fair on the sharp left and sharp right curves.

High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on the straightaway and on both left curves.

Technical measurements for this test
Trim level(s)
  • 2.5 S Premium Plus trim
  • 2.5 Turbo Signature trim
  • 2.5 Carbon Turbo trim
  • 2.5 Turbo Premium trim
Low-beam headlight type LED projector
High-beam headlight type LED projector
Curve-adaptive? Yes
High-beam assist? Yes
Overall rating
Applies to 2018-25 models
LOW BEAMS Average minimum useful
illumination distance (5 lux)		 Amount glare
exceeded threshold
Straightaway right edge 119.5 m None
Straightaway left edge 54.7 m None
250m radius right curve, right edge 75.8 m None
250m radius left curve, left edge 55.6 m 1.2%
150m radius right curve, right edge 68.2 m None
150m radius left curve, left edge 55.2 m 6.1%
HIGH BEAMS Average minimum useful
illumination distance (5 lux)
Straightaway right edge 139.8 m
Straightaway left edge 135.9 m
250m radius right curve, right edge 77.3 m
250m radius left curve, left edge 77.3 m
150m radius right curve, right edge 63.4 m
150m radius left curve, left edge 63.8 m

Trim level(s)

  • 2.5 S Select trim
  • 2.5 S Preferred trim
  • 2.5 S Carbon Edition trim
  • 2.5 S trim
Low-beam headlight typeLED projector
High-beam headlight typeLED projector
Curve-adaptive?No
High-beam assist?Yes
Overall rating
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination:
car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler 0 ft 100 ft 200 ft 300 ft 400 ft 500 ft 600 ft Low beams Optimal low-beam illumination High beams Optimal high-beam illumination High-beam assist credit

Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the right side of the road and fair on the left side. On curves, visibility was good on both right curves, fair on the sharp left curve and inadequate on the gradual left curve.

The low beams never exceeded glare limits.

High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the right side of the road and fair on the left side. On curves, visibility was inadequate in all 4 tests.

High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on the straightaway and on both left curves.

Technical measurements for this test
Trim level(s)
  • 2.5 S Select trim
  • 2.5 S Preferred trim
  • 2.5 S Carbon Edition trim
  • 2.5 S trim
Low-beam headlight type LED projector
High-beam headlight type LED projector
Curve-adaptive? No
High-beam assist? Yes
Overall rating
Applies to 2018-25 models
LOW BEAMS Average minimum useful
illumination distance (5 lux)		 Amount glare
exceeded threshold
Straightaway right edge 109.8 m None
Straightaway left edge 48.4 m None
250m radius right curve, right edge 66.5 m None
250m radius left curve, right edge 47.4 m None
150m radius right curve, right edge 55.8 m None
150m radius left curve, left edge 46.5 m None
HIGH BEAMS Average minimum useful
illumination distance (5 lux)
Straightaway right edge 147.6 m
Straightaway left edge 136.8 m
250m radius right curve, right edge 64.1 m
250m radius left curve, left edge 61.9 m
150m radius right curve, right edge 49.6 m
150m radius left curve, left edge 48.2 m

About the headlight evaluation

Front crash prevention: vehicle-to-vehicle 2.0

Rating applies to all 2023-25 models

System details

  • standard Advanced Smart City Brake Support with Pedestrian Detection

Overall evaluation

Passenger car target

Test runSpeed reductionTimely warning?
31 mph/target centeredCollision avoided
31 mph/target off-centerCollision avoided
37 mph/target centered32 mph
37 mph/target off-center36 mph
43 mph/target centered24 mph
43 mph/target off-center25 mph

Motorcycle target

Test runSpeed reductionTimely warning?
31 mph/target centered1 mph
31 mph/target off-centerAutobrake not tested
37 mph/target centeredAutobrake not tested
37 mph/target off-centerAutobrake not tested
43 mph/target centeredAutobrake not tested
43 mph/target off-centerAutobrake not tested

Semitrailer

Only warning is tested with the semitrailer.

Test runTimely warning?
31 mph/target centered
37 mph/target centered
43 mph/target centered

About the front crash prevention test

Front crash prevention: pedestrian (day)

System details

  • standard Smart Brake Support with Collision Warning and Advanced Smart City Brake Support with Pedestrian Detection

Overall evaluation

This rating applies to all 2018-25 models

Advanced
Advanced

Crossing child

  • In the 12 mph test, impact speed was reduced by 10 mph.
  • In the 25 mph test, impact speed was reduced by 21 mph.

Crossing adult

  • In the 12 mph test, impact speed was reduced by 11 mph.
  • In the 25 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision.

Parallel adult

  • In the 25 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision.
  • In the 37 mph test, impact speed was reduced by 36 mph. A warning was issued 1.5 seconds before impact.

About the pedestrian front crash prevention test

Seat belt reminders

Rating applies to 2023-25 models

Overall evaluation
Front row
Unbelted occupant alert (audible & visual)
Initiation time
DurationLong enough (90+ seconds)
Volume
Audio frequency
Second row
Startup status alert (visual)
Initiation time
Duration at least 60 seconds
Belt disengaged alert (audible & visual)
Initiation time
Duration at least 30 seconds
Volume
Audio frequency
Technical measurements for this test
Background cabin sound pressure level at 24 km/h 50 dB
Audible signal sound pressure level at 24 km/h 77 dB
Difference between background and signal 27.1 dB
Background cabin sound pressure level at 40 km/h 53 dB
Audible signal sound pressure level at 40 km/h 76 dB
Difference between background and signal 22.6 dB
Dominant audio frequency 1840 Hz

About the seat belt reminder evaluation

Child seat anchors

Rating applies to 2017-25 models

Overall evaluation
Vehicle trimTouring
Seat type leatherette

This vehicle has 2 rear seating positions with complete child seat attachment (LATCH) hardware.

It has 1 additional seating position with a tether anchor and the ability to borrow lower anchors from the other seating positions.

Note: When anchors are borrowed, they aren't available to use in their designated positions.

Overall evaluation
Vehicle trimTouring
Seat type leatherette
1 2 3
GGood
AAcceptable
MMarginal
PPoor
Seating positions that rely on borrowed lower anchors or have only a tether anchor available are not rated.
thether anchor symbol
Tether anchor
lower anchor symbol
Lower anchors
shared lower achors symbol
Lower anchor(s) can be borrowed from adjacent positions(s)
No hardware available

Details by seating position

1
Tether anchor
easy-to-find location
no other hardware could be confused for anchor
Lower anchors
too deep in seat
not too much force needed to attach
easy to maneuver around anchors
2
Tether anchor
easy-to-find location
no other hardware could be confused for anchor
Lower anchors
Can be borrowed from 1 and 3
3
Tether anchor
easy-to-find location
no other hardware could be confused for anchor
Lower anchors
too deep in seat
not too much force needed to attach
easy to maneuver around anchors
Technical measurements for this test

Seat position 21

3

Lower anchor A
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) 4-6
Force (lbs) 3
Clearance angle (degrees) 68
Lower anchor B
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) 4-6
Force (lbs) 8
Clearance angle (degrees) 56
Tether anchor
Location Middle seatback
Confusing hardware present Yes
Has contrasting label
within 3 inches of tether anchor		 Yes
Tether anchors can be accessed
while seatback is properly positioned
for use of LATCH		 Not measured

Seat position 22

2

Lower anchor A
Lower latch is shared for this seat position
Lower anchor B
Lower latch is shared for this seat position
Tether anchor
Location Middle seatback
Confusing hardware present Yes
Has contrasting label
within 3 inches of tether anchor		 Yes
Tether anchors can be accessed
while seatback is properly positioned
for use of LATCH		 Not measured

Seat position 23

1

Lower anchor A
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) 4-6
Force (lbs) 9
Clearance angle (degrees) 59
Lower anchor B
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) 4-6
Force (lbs) 6
Clearance angle (degrees) 72
Tether anchor
Location Middle seatback
Confusing hardware present Yes
Has contrasting label
within 3 inches of tether anchor		 Yes
Tether anchors can be accessed
while seatback is properly positioned
for use of LATCH		 Not measured

About the child seat anchor evaluation