2017 Chrysler Pacifica

Rating overview
Evaluation criteria	Rating
Small overlap front: driver-side
Small overlap front: passenger-side
Moderate overlap front: original test
Side: original test
Roof strength
Head restraints & seats

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Headlights (varies by trim/option)
Front crash prevention: vehicle-to-vehicle
Optional system	Superior

Evaluation criteria	Rating
LATCH ease of use

Small overlap front: driver-side

Rating applies to 2017-25 models built after August 2016

Tested vehicle: 2017 Chrysler Pacifica Touring

The Chrysler Pacifica was introduced in the 2017 model year as a replacement for the Chrysler Town and Country minivan. The Chrysler Voyager, available new only to fleet buyers, was introduced in the 2020 model year and shares the same platform as the Pacifica.

Two tests of the Pacifica were conducted because the driver door was torn off its hinges in the first test. As a result, Fiat Chrysler strengthened the upper hinge and reinforced the joint between the door hinge pillar and inner body panel in front of the pillar. In the second test, the upper hinge held and the door stayed shut.

The small overlap frontal ratings listed below apply only to vehicles built after August 2016, that is after the door hinge improvements were made. (Information about when a specific vehicle was manufactured is on the certification label typically affixed to the car on the driver door or adjacent B-pillar.)

Evaluation criteria	Rating

Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Hip/thigh
Lower leg/foot
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics

Action shot taken during the driver-side small overlap frontal crash test of the 2017 Chrysler Pacifica built after August 2016.

The dummy's position in relation to the door frame, steering wheel, and instrument panel after the crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was maintained reasonably well.

The frontal and side curtain airbags worked well together to keep the head from coming close to any stiff structure or outside objects that could cause injury.

The driver's space was maintained reasonably well, and risk of injuries to the dummy's legs and feet was low.

Technical measurements for this test

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	CEN1635
Lower occupant compartment
Lower hinge pillar max (cm)	12
Footrest (cm)	14
Left toepan (cm)	11
Brake pedal (cm)	5
Parking brake (cm)
Rocker panel lateral average (cm)	4
Upper occupant compartment
Steering column	2
Upper hinge pillar max (cm)	7
Upper dash (cm)	8
Lower instrument panel (cm)	9

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	CEN1635
Head
HIC-15	71
Peak gs at hard contact	no contact
Neck
Tension (kN)	0.8
Extension bending moment (Nm)	8
Maximum Nij	0.18
Chest maximum compression (mm)	20
Femur (kN)
Left	1.2
Right	0.8
Knee displacement (mm)
Left	2
Right	1
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left	0
Right	0
Maximum tibia index
Left	0.73
Right	0.31
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left	2.2
Right	1.7
Foot acceleration (g)
Left	45
Right	28

Rating applies to 2017 models built before September 2016

Tested vehicle: 2017 Chrysler Pacifica Touring

The Chrysler Pacifica was introduced in the 2017 model year as a replacement for the Chrysler Town and Country minivan. The Pacifica does not share a platform with the Dodge Grand Caravan.

Two tests of the Pacifica were conducted because the driver door was torn off its hinges in the first test. As a result, Fiat Chrysler strengthened the upper hinge and reinforced the joint between the door hinge pillar and inner body panel in front of the pillar. In the second test, the upper hinge held and the door stayed shut.

The small overlap frontal ratings listed below apply only to vehicles built before September 2016, that is before the door hinge improvements were made. (Information about when a specific vehicle was manufactured is on the certification label typically affixed to the car on the driver door or adjacent B-pillar.)

Evaluation criteria	Rating

Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Hip/thigh
Lower leg/foot
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics The driver door was torn from its hinges and the door opened at the front, which shouldn't happen because the driver could be partly or completely ejected from the vehicle. Still, the dummy’s head loaded the frontal airbag, which stayed in front of the dummy until rebound. The side curtain airbag deployed and has sufficient forward coverage to protect the head from contact with side structure and outside objects. The side torso airbag also deployed.

Action shot taken during the small overlap frontal crash test of the 2017 Chrysler Pacifica built before September 2016.

The dummy's position in relation to the door frame, steering wheel, and instrument panel after the crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was maintained well.

The frontal and side curtain airbags worked well together to keep the head from coming close to any stiff structure or outside objects that could cause injury.

The driver's space was maintained well, and risk of injuries to the dummy's legs and feet was low.

Technical measurements for this test

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	CEN1624
Lower occupant compartment
Lower hinge pillar max (cm)	11
Footrest (cm)	12
Left toepan (cm)	8
Brake pedal (cm)	3
Parking brake (cm)
Rocker panel lateral average (cm)	4
Upper occupant compartment
Steering column	1
Upper hinge pillar max (cm)	7
Upper dash (cm)	7
Lower instrument panel (cm)	7

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	CEN1624
Head
HIC-15	75
Peak gs at hard contact	no contact
Neck
Tension (kN)	0.8
Extension bending moment (Nm)	8
Maximum Nij	0.17
Chest maximum compression (mm)	21
Femur (kN)
Left	0.8
Right	1.3
Knee displacement (mm)
Left	2
Right	1
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left	0
Right	0
Maximum tibia index
Left	0.77
Right	0.48
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left	2.6
Right	2.4
Foot acceleration (g)
Left	63
Right	38

About the small overlap front test

Small overlap front: passenger-side

Rating applies to 2017-20 models built after August 2016 and before September 2020

Tested vehicle: 2018 Chrysler Pacifica L 4-door

The Chrysler Pacifica was introduced in the 2017 model year as a replacement for the Chrysler Town and Country minivan. The Chrysler Voyager was introduced in the 2020 model year and shares the same platform as the Pacifica.

Beginning with 2017 models built after August 2016, the upper hinge of both the driver and front passenger doors was strengthened and the joint between the door hinge pillar and inner body panel in front of the pillar was reinforced. (Information about when a specific vehicle was manufactured is on the certification label typically affixed to the car on the driver door or adjacent B-pillar.)

Two passenger-side small overlap frontal tests of the Pacifica were conducted, one by the Institute and the other by Fiat Chrysler. Ratings are based on both tests.

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Passenger injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Hip/thigh
Lower leg/foot
Passenger restraints and dummy kinematics
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Hip/thigh
Lower leg/foot
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics

Action shot taken during the Institute's passenger-side small overlap frontal crash test.

The dummy's position in relation to the door frame and dashboard after the crash test indicates that the passenger's survival space was not maintained well (Institute test car shown).

The frontal and side curtain airbags worked well together to keep the head from coming close to any stiff structure or outside objects that could cause injury (Institute test shown).

Despite intrusion of the door hinge pillar and dashboard in both tests, risk of injuries to the dummy's legs and feet was low.

Technical measurements for this test

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	VTP1808	CEP1816
Lower occupant compartment
Lower hinge pillar max (cm)	16	17
Footrest (cm)	16	17
Right toepan (cm)	10	11
Center toepan (cm)	4	3
Rocker panel lateral average (cm)	4	4
Upper occupant compartment
Center dash (cm)	9	10
Upper hinge pillar max (cm)	10	8
Upper dash (cm)	13	13
Right lower dash (cm)	14	13

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	VTP1808	CEP1816
Head
HIC-15	72	90
Peak gs at hard contact	no contact	no contact
Neck
Tension (kN)	0.8	1.0
Extension bending moment (Nm)	20	9
Maximum Nij	0.23	0.19
Chest maximum compression (mm)	21	19
Femur (kN)
Left	2.2	1.6
Right	2.4	1.9
Knee displacement (mm)
Left	4	3
Right	6	6
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left	0	0
Right	0	0
Maximum tibia index
Left	0.49	0.54
Right	0.56	0.53
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left	2.5	2.0
Right	2.2	2.1
Foot acceleration (g)
Left	34	31
Right	43	26

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	VTP1808	CEP1816
Head
HIC-15	40	47
Peak gs at hard contact	no contact	no contact
Neck
Tension (kN)	1.3	1.1
Extension bending moment (Nm)	13	14
Maximum Nij	0.22	0.22
Chest maximum compression (mm)	23	25
Femur (kN)
Left	0.6	0.6
Right	0.2	0.1
Knee displacement (mm)
Left	0	2
Right	0	1
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left	0	0
Right	0	0
Maximum tibia index
Left	0.34	0.39
Right	0.32	0.38
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left	1.3	1.3
Right	0.5	0.7
Foot acceleration (g)
Left	21	23
Right	39	38

About the small overlap front test

Moderate overlap front: original test

Rating applies to 2017-25 models

Tested vehicle: 2017 Chrysler Pacifica Touring

The Chrysler Pacifica was introduced in the 2017 model year as a replacement for the Chrysler Town and Country minivan. The Chrysler Voyager, available new only to fleet buyers, was introduced in the 2020 model year and shares the same platform as the Pacifica. Moderate overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Fiat Chrysler.

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Leg/foot, left
Leg/foot, right
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics

Technical measurements for this test

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	VTF1615
Footwell intrusion
Footrest (cm)	10
Left (cm)	15
Center (cm)	16
Right (cm)	16
Brake pedal (cm)	9
Instrument panel rearward movement
Left (cm)	1
Right (cm)	1
Steering column movement
Upward (cm)	-4
Rearward (cm)	-6
A-pillar rearward movement (cm)	0

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	VTF1615
Head
HIC-15	151
Peak gs at hard contact	no contact
Neck
Tension (kN)	1.0
Extension bending moment (Nm)	14
Maximum Nij	0.20
Chest maximum compression (mm)	31
Legs
Femur force - left (kN)	0.3
Femur force - right (kN)	0.0
Knee displacement - left (mm)	1
Knee displacement - right (mm)	0
Maximum tibia index - left	0.68
Maximum tibia index - right	0.53
Tibia axial force - left (kN)	1.6
Tibia axial force - right (kN)	2.0
Foot acceleration (g)
Left	69
Right	82

About the original moderate overlap front test

Side: original test

Rating applies to 2017-23 models

Tested vehicle: 2017 Chrysler Pacifica Touring

The Chrysler Pacifica was introduced in the 2017 model year as a replacement for the Chrysler Town and Country minivan. The Chrysler Voyager, available new only to fleet buyers, was introduced in the 2020 model year and shares the same platform as the Pacifica. Side ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Fiat Chrysler.

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Torso
Pelvis/leg
Driver head protection
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck
Torso
Pelvis/leg
Rear passenger head protection

Technical measurements for this test

Test ID	VTS1613
B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver's seat (cm)	-19.5
Negative numbers indicate the amount by which the crush stopped short of the seat centerline.

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	VTS1613
Head HIC-15	237
Neck
Tension (kN)	1.3
Compression (kN)	0.2
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm)	20
Lateral force (kN)	1.2
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm)	32
Average deflection (mm)	27
Maximum deflection rate (m/s)	2.61
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s)	0.35
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN)	1.2
Acetabulum force (kN)	1.5
Combined force (kN)	2.7
Left femur
L-M force (kN)	1.0
L-M moment (Nm)	150
A-P moment (Nm)	27

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	VTS1613
Head HIC-15	55
Neck
Tension (kN)	0.2
Compression (kN)	0.6
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm)	25
Lateral force (kN)	1.3
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm)	30
Average deflection (mm)	16
Maximum deflection rate (m/s)	2.85
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s)	0.32
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN)	1.8
Acetabulum force (kN)	2.8
Combined force (kN)	3.8
Left femur
L-M force (kN)	0.5
L-M moment (Nm)	98
A-P moment (Nm)	41

About the original side crash test

Roof strength

Rating applies to 2017-23 models

Tested vehicle: 2017 Chrysler Pacifica Touring

Ratings apply to the Chrysler Pacifica (tested) and the structurally similar Chrysler Voyager.

Overall evaluation
Curb weight	4,378 lbs
Peak force	20,056 lbs
Strength-to-weight ratio	4.58

About the roof strength test

Head restraints & seats

Seat type: Power cloth seat

Overall evaluation
Dynamic rating
Seat/head restraint geometry

Technical measurements for this test

Seat type	Power cloth seat
Geometry
Backset (mm)	12
Distance below top of head (mm)	14
Seat design parameters
Pass/fail	Pass
Max T1 acceleration (g)	10.8
Head contact time (ms)	49
Force rating	1
Neck forces
Max neck shear force (N)	0
Max neck tension (N)	290

About the head restraint & seat test
Currently, IIHS tests apply only to front seats.

Headlights

Ratings are given for 5 different headlight variations available on this vehicle.

Trim level(s)

Limited trim equipped with Advanced SafetyTec package

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Low-beam headlight type	HID projector
High-beam headlight type	Halogen reflector
Curve-adaptive?	No
High-beam assist?	Yes
Overall rating
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination:

Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was fair on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was fair on the sharp left and both right curves and inadequate on the gradual left curve.

The low beams never exceeded glare limits.

High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the right side of the road and inadequate on the left side. On curves, visibility was fair in all 4 tests.

High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on the straightaway and all 4 curves.

Technical measurements for this test

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Trim level(s)	Limited trim equipped with Advanced SafetyTec package
Low-beam headlight type	HID projector
High-beam headlight type	Halogen reflector
Curve-adaptive?	No
High-beam assist?	Yes
Overall rating Applies to 2017-20 models

LOW BEAMS	Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)	Amount glare exceeded threshold
Straightaway right edge	78.2 m	None
Straightaway left edge	48.6 m	None
250m radius right curve, right edge	64.7 m	None
250m radius left curve, right edge	51.0 m	None
150m radius right curve, right edge	52.2 m	None
150m radius left curve, left edge	51.0 m	None

HIGH BEAMS	Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)
Straightaway right edge	153.6 m
Straightaway left edge	127.5 m
250m radius right curve, right edge	72.1 m
250m radius left curve, left edge	66.3 m
150m radius right curve, right edge	55.9 m
150m radius left curve, left edge	55.5 m

Trim level(s)

Limited trim

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Low-beam headlight type	HID projector
High-beam headlight type	Halogen reflector
Curve-adaptive?	No
High-beam assist?	No
Overall rating
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination:

Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was fair on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was fair on the sharp left and both right curves and inadequate on the gradual left curve.

The low beams never exceeded glare limits.

High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the right side of the road and inadequate on the left side. On curves, visibility was fair in all 4 tests.

Technical measurements for this test

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Trim level(s)	Limited trim
Low-beam headlight type	HID projector
High-beam headlight type	Halogen reflector
Curve-adaptive?	No
High-beam assist?	No
Overall rating Applies to 2017-20 models

LOW BEAMS	Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)	Amount glare exceeded threshold
Straightaway right edge	78.2 m	None
Straightaway left edge	48.6 m	None
250m radius right curve, right edge	64.7 m	None
250m radius left curve, right edge	51.0 m	None
150m radius right curve, right edge	52.2 m	None
150m radius left curve, left edge	51.0 m	None

HIGH BEAMS	Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)
Straightaway right edge	153.6 m
Straightaway left edge	127.5 m
250m radius right curve, right edge	72.1 m
250m radius left curve, left edge	66.3 m
150m radius right curve, right edge	55.9 m
150m radius left curve, left edge	55.5 m

Trim level(s)

Touring L trim equipped with Advanced SafetyTec package
Touring L Plus trim equipped with Advanced SafetyTec package

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Low-beam headlight type	Halogen projector
High-beam headlight type	Halogen reflector
Curve-adaptive?	No
High-beam assist?	Yes
Overall rating
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination:

Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was fair on the left side of the road and inadequate on the right side. On curves, visibility was inadequate in all 4 tests.

The low beams never exceeded glare limits.

High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was fair on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was inadequate in all 4 tests.

High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on the straightaway and all 4 curves.

Technical measurements for this test

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Trim level(s)	Touring L trim equipped with Advanced SafetyTec package Touring L Plus trim equipped with Advanced SafetyTec package
Low-beam headlight type	Halogen projector
High-beam headlight type	Halogen reflector
Curve-adaptive?	No
High-beam assist?	Yes
Overall rating Applies to 2017-20 models

LOW BEAMS	Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)	Amount glare exceeded threshold
Straightaway right edge	72.4 m	None
Straightaway left edge	51.7 m	None
250m radius right curve, right edge	49.8 m	None
250m radius left curve, left edge	46.1 m	None
150m radius right curve, right edge	42.4 m	None
150m radius left curve, left edge	40.2 m	None

HIGH BEAMS	Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)
Straightaway right edge	136.5 m
Straightaway left edge	135.2 m
250m radius right curve, right edge	57.7 m
250m radius left curve, left edge	59.0 m
150m radius right curve, right edge	47.8 m
150m radius left curve, left edge	48.1 m

Trim level(s)

Touring L trim
Touring L Plus trim

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Low-beam headlight type	Halogen projector
High-beam headlight type	Halogen reflector
Curve-adaptive?	No
High-beam assist?	No
Overall rating
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination:

Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was fair on the left side of the road and inadequate on the right side. On curves, visibility was inadequate in all 4 tests.

The low beams never exceeded glare limits.

High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was fair on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was inadequate in all 4 tests.

Technical measurements for this test

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Trim level(s)	Touring L trim Touring L Plus trim
Low-beam headlight type	Halogen projector
High-beam headlight type	Halogen reflector
Curve-adaptive?	No
High-beam assist?	No
Overall rating Applies to 2017-20 models

LOW BEAMS	Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)	Amount glare exceeded threshold
Straightaway right edge	72.4 m	None
Straightaway left edge	51.7 m	None
250m radius right curve, right edge	49.8 m	None
250m radius left curve, left edge	46.1 m	None
150m radius right curve, right edge	42.4 m	None
150m radius left curve, left edge	40.2 m	None

HIGH BEAMS	Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)
Straightaway right edge	136.5 m
Straightaway left edge	135.2 m
250m radius right curve, right edge	57.7 m
250m radius left curve, left edge	59.0 m
150m radius right curve, right edge	47.8 m
150m radius left curve, left edge	48.1 m

Trim level(s)

LX trim
Touring trim

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Low-beam headlight type	Halogen reflector
High-beam headlight type	Halogen reflector
Curve-adaptive?	No
High-beam assist?	No
Overall rating
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination:

Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was inadequate on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was inadequate in all 4 tests.

The low beams never exceeded glare limits.

High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was inadequate on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was inadequate in all 4 tests.

Technical measurements for this test

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Trim level(s)	LX trim Touring trim
Low-beam headlight type	Halogen reflector
High-beam headlight type	Halogen reflector
Curve-adaptive?	No
High-beam assist?	No
Overall rating Applies to 2017-19 models

LOW BEAMS	Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)	Amount glare exceeded threshold
Straightaway right edge	68.7 m	None
Straightaway left edge	37.0 m	None
250m radius right curve, right edge	39.6 m	None
250m radius left curve, left edge	37.5 m	None
150m radius right curve, right edge	36.1 m	None
150m radius left curve, left edge	34.7 m	None

HIGH BEAMS	Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)
Straightaway right edge	117.4 m
Straightaway left edge	79.3 m
250m radius right curve, right edge	47.8 m
250m radius left curve, left edge	48.9 m
150m radius right curve, right edge	41.0 m
150m radius left curve, left edge	40.9 m

About the headlight evaluation

Front crash prevention: vehicle-to-vehicle

System details

Optional Full Speed Forward Collision Warning Plus

Package name

Optional Advanced SafetyTec

Overall evaluation

Applies to 2017-20 models

Superior

with optional equipment

This system meets the requirements for forward collision warning.
In the 12 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision.
In the 25 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision.

About the original front crash prevention test

Child seat anchors

Rating applies to 2017-19 models built after August 2016

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Overall evaluation
Vehicle trim	Touring
Seat type	cloth

This vehicle has 4 rear seating positions with complete child seat attachment (LATCH) hardware.

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Overall evaluation
Vehicle trim	Touring
Seat type	cloth

Rating icon	Rating
G	Good
A	Acceptable
M	Marginal
P	Poor
	Seating positions that rely on borrowed lower anchors or have only a tether anchor available are not rated.
thether anchor symbol	Tether anchor
lower anchor symbol	Lower anchors
shared lower achors symbol	Lower anchor(s) can be borrowed from adjacent positions(s)
	No hardware available

Details by seating position

Position	Rating
1
1	Tether anchor
	hard-to-find location
	no other hardware could be confused for anchor
	Lower anchors
	not too deep in seat
	too much force needed to attach
	difficult to maneuver around anchors
3
3	Tether anchor
	hard-to-find location
	no other hardware could be confused for anchor
	Lower anchors
	not too deep in seat
	too much force needed to attach
	difficult to maneuver around anchors
4
4	Tether anchor
	hard-to-find location
	other hardware could be confused for anchor
	Lower anchors
	too deep in seat
	not too much force needed to attach
	easy to maneuver around anchors
6
6	Tether anchor
	hard-to-find location
	other hardware could be confused for anchor
	Lower anchors
	not too deep in seat
	not too much force needed to attach
	difficult to maneuver around anchors

Technical measurements for this test

Lower anchor A
Open access rated	No
Depth (cm)	0-2
Force (lbs)	45
Clearance angle (degrees)	46
Lower anchor B
Open access rated	No
Depth (cm)	0-2
Force (lbs)	35
Clearance angle (degrees)	47
Tether anchor
Location	Bottom seatback
Confusing hardware present	Yes
Has contrasting label within 3 inches of tether anchor	Yes
Tether anchors can be accessed while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH	Not measured

Lower anchor A
Open access rated	No
Depth (cm)	0-2
Force (lbs)	36
Clearance angle (degrees)	70
Lower anchor B
Open access rated	No
Depth (cm)	0-2
Force (lbs)	49
Clearance angle (degrees)	46
Tether anchor
Location	Bottom seatback
Confusing hardware present	Yes
Has contrasting label within 3 inches of tether anchor	Yes
Tether anchors can be accessed while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH	Not measured

Lower anchor A
Open access rated	No
Depth (cm)	0-2
Force (lbs)	26
Clearance angle (degrees)	could not measure
Lower anchor B
Open access rated	No
Depth (cm)	0-2
Force (lbs)	28
Clearance angle (degrees)	could not measure
Tether anchor
Location	Bottom seatback
Confusing hardware present	Yes
Has contrasting label within 3 inches of tether anchor	No
Tether anchors can be accessed while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH	Not measured

Rating applies to 2017-19 models built after August 2016

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Overall evaluation
Vehicle trim	Touring
Seat type	leather

This vehicle has 4 rear seating positions with complete child seat attachment (LATCH) hardware.

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Overall evaluation
Vehicle trim	Touring
Seat type	leather

Rating icon	Rating
G	Good
A	Acceptable
M	Marginal
P	Poor
	Seating positions that rely on borrowed lower anchors or have only a tether anchor available are not rated.
thether anchor symbol	Tether anchor
lower anchor symbol	Lower anchors
shared lower achors symbol	Lower anchor(s) can be borrowed from adjacent positions(s)
	No hardware available

Details by seating position

Position	Rating
1
1	Tether anchor
	hard-to-find location
	no other hardware could be confused for anchor
	Lower anchors
	not too deep in seat
	too much force needed to attach
	difficult to maneuver around anchors
3
3	Tether anchor
	hard-to-find location
	no other hardware could be confused for anchor
	Lower anchors
	not too deep in seat
	not too much force needed to attach
	difficult to maneuver around anchors
4
4	Tether anchor
	hard-to-find location
	other hardware could be confused for anchor
	Lower anchors
	too deep in seat
	not too much force needed to attach
	easy to maneuver around anchors
6
6	Tether anchor
	hard-to-find location
	other hardware could be confused for anchor
	Lower anchors
	too deep in seat
	not too much force needed to attach
	difficult to maneuver around anchors

Technical measurements for this test

Rating applies to 2017 models built before September 2016

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Overall evaluation
Vehicle trim	Touring
Seat type	cloth

This vehicle has 4 rear seating positions with complete child seat attachment (LATCH) hardware.

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Overall evaluation
Vehicle trim	Touring
Seat type	cloth

Rating icon	Rating
G	Good
A	Acceptable
M	Marginal
P	Poor
	Seating positions that rely on borrowed lower anchors or have only a tether anchor available are not rated.
thether anchor symbol	Tether anchor
lower anchor symbol	Lower anchors
shared lower achors symbol	Lower anchor(s) can be borrowed from adjacent positions(s)
	No hardware available

Details by seating position

Position	Rating
1
1	Tether anchor
	hard-to-find location
	other hardware could be confused for anchor
	Lower anchors
	not too deep in seat
	too much force needed to attach
	difficult to maneuver around anchors
3
3	Tether anchor
	hard-to-find location
	other hardware could be confused for anchor
	Lower anchors
	not too deep in seat
	too much force needed to attach
	difficult to maneuver around anchors
4
4	Tether anchor
	hard-to-find location
	other hardware could be confused for anchor
	Lower anchors
	too deep in seat
	not too much force needed to attach
	easy to maneuver around anchors
6
6	Tether anchor
	hard-to-find location
	other hardware could be confused for anchor
	Lower anchors
	not too deep in seat
	not too much force needed to attach
	difficult to maneuver around anchors

Technical measurements for this test

Rating applies to 2017 models built before September 2016

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Overall evaluation
Vehicle trim	Touring
Seat type	leather

This vehicle has 4 rear seating positions with complete child seat attachment (LATCH) hardware.

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Overall evaluation
Vehicle trim	Touring
Seat type	leather

Rating icon	Rating
G	Good
A	Acceptable
M	Marginal
P	Poor
	Seating positions that rely on borrowed lower anchors or have only a tether anchor available are not rated.
thether anchor symbol	Tether anchor
lower anchor symbol	Lower anchors
shared lower achors symbol	Lower anchor(s) can be borrowed from adjacent positions(s)
	No hardware available

Details by seating position

Position	Rating
1
1	Tether anchor
	hard-to-find location
	other hardware could be confused for anchor
	Lower anchors
	not too deep in seat
	too much force needed to attach
	difficult to maneuver around anchors
3
3	Tether anchor
	hard-to-find location
	other hardware could be confused for anchor
	Lower anchors
	not too deep in seat
	not too much force needed to attach
	difficult to maneuver around anchors
4
4	Tether anchor
	hard-to-find location
	other hardware could be confused for anchor
	Lower anchors
	too deep in seat
	not too much force needed to attach
	easy to maneuver around anchors
6
6	Tether anchor
	hard-to-find location
	other hardware could be confused for anchor
	Lower anchors
	too deep in seat
	not too much force needed to attach
	difficult to maneuver around anchors

Technical measurements for this test

About the child seat anchor evaluation

2017 Chrysler Pacifica

minivan

Crashworthiness

Crash avoidance & mitigation

Seat belts & child restraints

Other available safety features

Small overlap front: driver-side

Small overlap front: passenger-side

Moderate overlap front: original test

Side: original test

Roof strength

Head restraints & seats

Headlights

Trim level(s)

Trim level(s)

Trim level(s)

Trim level(s)

Trim level(s)

Front crash prevention: vehicle-to-vehicle

System details

Package name

Overall evaluation

Child seat anchors