2025 Ford Expedition

large SUV / 4-door SUV

2025 Ford Expedition 4-door SUV
2024 Ford Expedition shown

Crashworthiness

Rating overview
Evaluation criteria Rating
Small overlap front
M
Moderate overlap front: original test
G
Moderate overlap front: updated test
M
Side: updated test
G

Seat belts & child restraints

Evaluation criteria Rating
Seat belt reminders
G

Other available safety features

  • Standard blind spot detection
  • Standard lane departure warning & prevention
  • Standard rear automatic braking

Key

  • G
    Good
  • A
    Acceptable
  • M
    Marginal
  • P
    Poor
  • Superior
  • Advanced
  • Basic

Some ratings use a scale of Poor to Good. Others range from Basic to Superior.

Small overlap front

The small overlap front evaluation consists of a driver-side and a passenger-side component. If the results of the two evaluations differ, then the combined small overlap rating is equal to the lower rating.

Driver-side

  • Rating applies to 2023-25 models

Tested vehicle: 2023 Ford Expedition XLT 4-door 4wd

The Ford Expedition was redesigned for the 2018 model year.

Evaluation criteria Rating
Overall driver-side evaluation
M
Structure and safety cage
P
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
G
Chest
G
Hip/thigh
G
Lower leg/foot
P
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics
The dummy’s head contacted the frontal airbag but slid off the left side, leaving the head vulnerable to contact with forward structure. The side curtain airbag deployed and has sufficient forward coverage to protect the head from contact with side structure and outside objects.
A

Action shot taken during the driver-side small overlap frontal crash test.

The dummy's position in relation to the door frame, steering wheel, and instrument panel after the crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was not maintained well. During the crash, the A-pillar separated completely from the rocker panel and the steering column became partially detached from the instrument panel.

Extensive intrusion of the footrest, toepan and brake pedal contributed to a high risk of injury to the right lower leg and a moderate risk to the left lower leg.

The dummy's head contacted the frontal airbag but then slid off the left side.

Technical measurements for this test

Passenger-side

  • Rating applies to 2023-25 models

Tested vehicle: 2023 Ford Expedition XLT 4-door 4wd

The Ford Expedition was redesigned for the 2018 model year.

Evaluation criteria Rating
Overall passenger-side evaluation
M
Structure and safety cage
P
Passenger injury measures
Head/neck
G
Chest
G
Hip/thigh
G
Lower leg/foot
A
Passenger restraints and dummy kinematics
G
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
G
Chest
G
Hip/thigh
G
Lower leg/foot
G
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics
G

Action shot taken during the driver-side small overlap frontal crash test.

The dummy's position in relation to the door frame, steering wheel, and instrument panel after the crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was not maintained well. During the crash, the A-pillar separated completely from the rocker panel.

Extensive intrusion of the footrest and toepan contributed to a high risk of injury to the right lower leg and a moderate risk to the left lower leg.

The frontal and side curtain airbags worked well together to keep the head from coming close to any stiff structure or outside objects that could cause injury.

Technical measurements for this test

About the small overlap front test

Moderate overlap front: original test

Rating applies to 2023-25 models

Tested vehicle: 2024 Ford Expedition XLT 4-door 4wd

The Ford Expedition was redesigned for the 2018 model year.

Evaluation criteria Rating
Overall evaluation
G
Structure and safety cage
G
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
G
Chest
G
Leg/foot, left
G
Leg/foot, right
G
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics
G

Action shot taken during the Institute's moderate overlap frontal crash test.

The dummy's position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after the crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was maintained very well.

The driver side curtain airbag did not deploy during the crash test.

Intrusion into the driver's space was minimal, and all leg and foot injury measures were low.

Technical measurements for this test

About the original moderate overlap front test

Moderate overlap front: updated test

Rating applies to 2023-25 models

Tested vehicle: 2024 Ford Expedition XLT 4-door 4wd

The Ford Expedition was redesigned for the 2018 model year.

Evaluation criteria Rating
Overall evaluation
M
Structure and safety cage
G
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
G
Chest
G
Thigh/hip
G
Leg/foot
G
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics
G
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck
G
Chest
M
Thigh
G
Rear passenger restraints and dummy kinematics
A

View of the vehicle after the crash showing the front driver airbags and damage to the occupant compartment. The driver and rear passenger side curtain airbags did not deploy during the test.

The rear passenger dummy's head remained a safe distance from the front seatback.

Rear passenger dummy injury values indicate a low risk of injury to the head or neck and a moderate risk of injury to the chest. During the crash, the shoulder belt remained in an ideal position on the dummy’s chest.

The rear passenger dummy's lap belt remained in the ideal position on the pelvis.

Technical measurements for this test

About the moderate overlap front test

February 2024 adjustment to rating criteria

Side: updated test

Rating applies to 2023-25 models

Tested vehicle: 2023 Ford Expedition XLT 4-door 4wd

The Ford Expedition was redesigned for the 2018 model year.

Evaluation criteria Rating
Overall evaluation
G
Structure and safety cage
G
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
G
Torso
G
Pelvis
G
Driver head protection
G
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck
G
Torso
G
Pelvis
G
Rear passenger head protection
A

View of the vehicle just after the crash test.

View of the vehicle after the crash with doors removed, showing the side airbags and damage to the occupant compartment.

Smeared greasepaint shows where the driver dummy's head was protected from being hit by hard structures by the side airbags.

The rear dummy's head contacted the side curtain airbag hard but did not contact any hard surfaces within the occupant compartment.

Technical measurements for this test

About the side crash test

Seat belt reminders

Rating applies to 2024-25 models

Evaluation criteria Rating
Overall evaluation
G
Front row
Unbelted occupant alert (audible & visual)
Initiation time
Duration Long enough (90+ seconds)
Volume
Audio frequency
Second row
Startup status alert (visual)
Initiation time
Duration at least 60 seconds
Belt disengaged alert (audible & visual)
Initiation time
Duration at least 30 seconds
Volume
Audio frequency
Technical measurements for this test

About the seat belt reminder evaluation