2019 Ford F-150

large pickup / Extended cab pickup

Crashworthiness

Rating overview
Evaluation criteria	Rating
Small overlap front: driver-side
Moderate overlap front: original test
Side: original test
Roof strength
Head restraints & seats

Crash avoidance & mitigation

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Headlights
Front crash prevention: vehicle-to-vehicle
Optional system	Superior
Standard system	Not tested

Seat belts & child restraints

Evaluation criteria	Rating
LATCH ease of use

Other available safety features

Optional blind spot detection
Optional lane departure warning
Optional lane departure prevention

Key

G
Good
A
Acceptable
M
Marginal
P
Poor

Superior
Advanced
Basic

Some ratings use a scale of Poor to Good. Others range from Basic to Superior.

Small overlap front: driver-side

Rating applies to 2016-20 models

Tested vehicle: 2016 Ford F-150 XLT SuperCab

The Ford F-150 SuperCab was redesigned for the 2015 model year. Beginning with 2016 models, "wheel blockers" like those in the SuperCrew variants were added to the vehicle frame to better control front wheel movement during small overlap frontal crashes.

Evaluation criteria	Rating

Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Hip/thigh
Lower leg/foot
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics

Action shot taken during the driver-side small overlap frontal crash test.

The dummy's position in relation to the door frame, steering wheel, and instrument panel after the crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was maintained well.

The frontal and side curtain airbags worked well together to keep the head from coming close to any stiff structure or outside objects that could cause injury.

The driver's space was maintained well, and risk of injuries to the dummy's legs and feet was low.

Technical measurements for this test

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	CEN1603
Lower occupant compartment
Lower hinge pillar max (cm)	5
Footrest (cm)	10
Left toepan (cm)	11
Brake pedal (cm)	12
Parking brake (cm)	7
Rocker panel lateral average (cm)	2
Upper occupant compartment
Steering column	3
Upper hinge pillar max (cm)	6
Upper dash (cm)	5
Lower instrument panel (cm)	4

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	CEN1603
Head
HIC-15	188
Peak gs at hard contact	no contact
Neck
Tension (kN)	1.2
Extension bending moment (Nm)	9
Maximum Nij	0.28
Chest maximum compression (mm)	22
Femur (kN)
Left	1.6
Right	3.1
Knee displacement (mm)
Left	1
Right	1
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left	0
Right	1
Maximum tibia index
Left	0.58
Right	0.49
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left	2.5
Right	1.8
Foot acceleration (g)
Left	117
Right	51

About the small overlap front test

Moderate overlap front: original test

Rating applies to 2015-20 models

Tested vehicle: 2016 Ford F-150 XLT SuperCab

The Ford F-150 SuperCab was redesigned for the 2015 model year. Two moderate overlap frontal tests were conducted, one by the Institute of a 2016 model and the other by Ford of a 2015 model. Ratings are based on both tests, but the vehicle specifications shown below are based on the Institute’s test.

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Leg/foot, left
Leg/foot, right
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics

Action shot taken during the Institute's moderate overlap frontal crash test.

The dummy's position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after the crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was maintained very well (Institute test vehicle shown).

In the Institute's test, the dummy's head contacted both the frontal and side curtain airbags and then rebounded against the head restraint, as indicated by smeared greasepaint.

Although intrusion into the driver's space was minimal in both tests, forces on the right lower leg were sufficiently high to indicate the possibility of injuries.

Technical measurements for this test

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	VTF1503	CEF1604
Footwell intrusion
Footrest (cm)	9	2
Left (cm)	9	1
Center (cm)	13	1
Right (cm)	12	1
Brake pedal (cm)	8	1
Instrument panel rearward movement
Left (cm)	1	-1
Right (cm)	0	0
Steering column movement
Upward (cm)	8	-2
Rearward (cm)	2	-3
A-pillar rearward movement (cm)	1	0

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	VTF1503	CEF1604
Head
HIC-15	170	208
Peak gs at hard contact	no contact	no contact
Neck
Tension (kN)	0.8	1.0
Extension bending moment (Nm)	21	12
Maximum Nij	0.26	0.19
Chest maximum compression (mm)	30	25
Legs
Femur force - left (kN)	0.3	0.7
Femur force - right (kN)	0.5	0.5
Knee displacement - left (mm)	0	4
Knee displacement - right (mm)	0	0
Maximum tibia index - left	0.42	0.47
Maximum tibia index - right	0.55	0.45
Tibia axial force - left (kN)	2.7	2.1
Tibia axial force - right (kN)	6.3	3.9
Foot acceleration (g)
Left	72	75
Right	136	95

About the original moderate overlap front test

Side: original test

Rating applies to 2015-20 models

Tested vehicle: 2015 Ford F-150 XLT SuperCab

The Ford F-150 SuperCab was redesigned for the 2015 model year.

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Torso
Pelvis/leg
Driver head protection
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck
Torso
Pelvis/leg
Rear passenger head protection

View of the vehicle and barrier just after the crash test.

View of the vehicle after the crash with the front door removed, showing the side airbags and damage to the occupant compartment.

Smeared greasepaint shows where the driver dummy's head was protected from being hit by hard structures by the side curtain airbag.

Smeared greasepaint shows where the rear passenger dummy’s head was protected by the side airbag.

Technical measurements for this test

Test ID	CES1507
B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver's seat (cm)	-15.5
Negative numbers indicate the amount by which the crush stopped short of the seat centerline.

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	CES1507
Head HIC-15	118
Neck
Tension (kN)	0.9
Compression (kN)	0.5
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm)	26
Lateral force (kN)	1.2
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm)	29
Average deflection (mm)	24
Maximum deflection rate (m/s)	4.57
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s)	0.38
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN)	1.8
Acetabulum force (kN)	1.3
Combined force (kN)	3.0
Left femur
L-M force (kN)	0.7
L-M moment (Nm)	101
A-P moment (Nm)	-32

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	CES1507
Head HIC-15	117
Neck
Tension (kN)	0.3
Compression (kN)	0.2
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm)	27
Lateral force (kN)	1.5
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm)	34
Average deflection (mm)	23
Maximum deflection rate (m/s)	3.44
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s)	0.44
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN)	0.7
Acetabulum force (kN)	1.5
Combined force (kN)	2.2
Left femur
L-M force (kN)	0.6
L-M moment (Nm)	102
A-P moment (Nm)	24

About the original side crash test

Roof strength

Rating applies to 2015-23 models

Tested vehicle: 2015 Ford F-150 XLT SuperCab

Overall evaluation
Curb weight	4,596 lbs
Peak force	24,536 lbs
Strength-to-weight ratio	5.34

About the roof strength test

Head restraints & seats

Seat type: Power cloth seat

Overall evaluation
Dynamic rating
Seat/head restraint geometry

Technical measurements for this test

Seat type	Power cloth seat
Geometry
Backset (mm)	11
Distance below top of head (mm)	29
Seat design parameters
Pass/fail	Pass
Max T1 acceleration (g)	15.0
Head contact time (ms)	50
Force rating	1
Neck forces
Max neck shear force (N)	0
Max neck tension (N)	332

About the head restraint & seat test
Currently, IIHS tests apply only to front seats.

Headlights

Ratings are given for 3 different headlight variations available on this vehicle.

Trim level(s)

XL trim
XLT trim
Lariat trim

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Low-beam headlight type	Halogen reflector
High-beam headlight type	Halogen reflector
Curve-adaptive?	No
High-beam assist?	Yes
Overall rating
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination:

Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was inadequate on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was inadequate in all 4 tests.

The low beams never exceeded glare limits.

High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was inadequate on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was inadequate in all 4 tests.

High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on the straightaway and all 4 curves.

Technical measurements for this test

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Trim level(s)	XL trim XLT trim Lariat trim
Low-beam headlight type	Halogen reflector
High-beam headlight type	Halogen reflector
Curve-adaptive?	No
High-beam assist?	Yes
Overall rating Applies to 2018-20 models

LOW BEAMS	Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)	Amount glare exceeded threshold
Straightaway right edge	45.5 m	None
Straightaway left edge	27.3 m	None
250m radius right curve, right edge	36.2 m	None
250m radius left curve, left edge	31.2 m	None
150m radius right curve, right edge	29.8 m	None
150m radius left curve, left edge	28.8 m	None

HIGH BEAMS	Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)
Straightaway right edge	125.6 m
Straightaway left edge	96.6 m
250m radius right curve, right edge	53.0 m
250m radius left curve, left edge	49.5 m
150m radius right curve, right edge	41.1 m
150m radius left curve, left edge	38.1 m

Trim level(s)

Raptor trim

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Low-beam headlight type	LED reflector
High-beam headlight type	LED reflector
Curve-adaptive?	No
High-beam assist?	Yes
Overall rating
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination:

Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the right side of the road and fair on the left side. On curves, visibility was inadequate in all 4 tests.

The low beams created excessive glare.

High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the right side of the road and fair on the left side. On curves, visibility was inadequate in all 4 tests.

High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on the straightaway and all 4 curves.

Technical measurements for this test

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Trim level(s)	Raptor trim
Low-beam headlight type	LED reflector
High-beam headlight type	LED reflector
Curve-adaptive?	No
High-beam assist?	Yes
Overall rating Applies to 2018-20 models

LOW BEAMS	Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)	Amount glare exceeded threshold
Straightaway right edge	98.6 m	187.9%
Straightaway left edge	51.4 m	187.9%
250m radius right curve, right edge	47.8 m	94.8%
250m radius left curve, left edge	41.4 m	185.9%
150m radius right curve, right edge	39.5 m	143.5%
150m radius left curve, left edge	36.6 m	159.4%

HIGH BEAMS	Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)
Straightaway right edge	166.1 m
Straightaway left edge	130.5 m
250m radius right curve, right edge	55.2 m
250m radius left curve, left edge	53.1 m
150m radius right curve, right edge	47.2 m
150m radius left curve, left edge	44.4 m

Trim level(s)

Lariat trim equipped with 502A package
King Ranch trim
Platinum trim
Limited trim

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Low-beam headlight type	LED reflector
High-beam headlight type	LED reflector
Curve-adaptive?	No
High-beam assist?	Yes
Overall rating
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination:

Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the right side of the road and fair on the left side. On curves, visibility was inadequate in all 4 tests.

The low beams created excessive glare.

High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the right side of the road and fair on the left side. On curves, visibility was inadequate in all 4 tests.

High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on the straightaway and all 4 curves.

Technical measurements for this test

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Trim level(s)	Lariat trim equipped with 502A package King Ranch trim Platinum trim Limited trim
Low-beam headlight type	LED reflector
High-beam headlight type	LED reflector
Curve-adaptive?	No
High-beam assist?	Yes
Overall rating Applies to 2018-20 models

LOW BEAMS	Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)	Amount glare exceeded threshold
Straightaway right edge	98.6 m	187.9%
Straightaway left edge	51.4 m	187.9%
250m radius right curve, right edge	47.8 m	94.8%
250m radius left curve, left edge	41.4 m	185.9%
150m radius right curve, right edge	39.5 m	143.5%
150m radius left curve, left edge	36.6 m	159.4%

HIGH BEAMS	Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)
Straightaway right edge	166.1 m
Straightaway left edge	130.5 m
250m radius right curve, right edge	55.2 m
250m radius left curve, left edge	53.1 m
150m radius right curve, right edge	47.2 m
150m radius left curve, left edge	44.4 m

About the headlight evaluation

Front crash prevention: vehicle-to-vehicle

Ratings are given for 2 different trim variations available on this vehicle.

System details

Optional Pre-Collision Assist with Pedestrian Detection

Package name

Optional Adaptive Cruise Control with Stop-and-Go

Overall evaluation

Applies to 2018-20 models

Superior

with optional equipment

This system meets the requirements for forward collision warning.
In the 12 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision.
In the 25 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision.

System details

Standard Pre-Collision Assist with Automatic Emergency Braking

Overall evaluation

Applies to 2019-20 models

This system meets the requirements for forward collision warning.
Autobrake not tested.

About the original front crash prevention test

Child seat anchors

Rating applies to 2016-20 models

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Overall evaluation
Vehicle trim	XLT SuperCab
Seat type	cloth

This vehicle has 2 rear seating positions with complete child seat attachment (LATCH) hardware.

It has 1 additional seating position with a tether anchor and the ability to borrow lower anchors from the other seating positions.

Note: When anchors are borrowed, they aren't available to use in their designated positions.

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Overall evaluation
Vehicle trim	XLT SuperCab
Seat type	cloth

Rating icon	Rating
G	Good
A	Acceptable
M	Marginal
P	Poor
	Seating positions that rely on borrowed lower anchors or have only a tether anchor available are not rated.
thether anchor symbol	Tether anchor
lower anchor symbol	Lower anchors
shared lower achors symbol	Lower anchor(s) can be borrowed from adjacent positions(s)
	No hardware available

Details by seating position

Position	Rating
1
1	Tether anchor
	hard-to-find location
	other hardware could be confused for anchor
	Lower anchors
	not too deep in seat
	not too much force needed to attach
	easy to maneuver around anchors
2
2	Tether anchor
	hard-to-find location
	other hardware could be confused for anchor
	Lower anchors
	Can be borrowed from 1 and 3
3
3	Tether anchor
	hard-to-find location
	other hardware could be confused for anchor
	Lower anchors
	not too deep in seat
	not too much force needed to attach
	easy to maneuver around anchors

Technical measurements for this test

Lower anchor A
Open access rated	No
Depth (cm)	-2-0
Force (lbs)	4
Clearance angle (degrees)	76
Lower anchor B
Open access rated	No
Depth (cm)	-2-0
Force (lbs)	1
Clearance angle (degrees)	71
Tether anchor
Location	Back wall
Confusing hardware present	Yes
Has contrasting label within 3 inches of tether anchor	No
Tether anchors can be accessed while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH	Not measured

Lower anchor A
Lower latch is shared for this seat position
Lower anchor B
Lower latch is shared for this seat position
Tether anchor
Location	Back wall
Confusing hardware present	Yes
Has contrasting label within 3 inches of tether anchor	No
Tether anchors can be accessed while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH	Not measured

Lower anchor A
Open access rated	No
Depth (cm)	-2-0
Force (lbs)	3
Clearance angle (degrees)	78
Lower anchor B
Open access rated	No
Depth (cm)	-2-0
Force (lbs)	1
Clearance angle (degrees)	76
Tether anchor
Location	Back wall
Confusing hardware present	Yes
Has contrasting label within 3 inches of tether anchor	No
Tether anchors can be accessed while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH	Not measured

About the child seat anchor evaluation