Small overlap front: driver-side
Rating applies to 2013-19 models
Tested vehicle: 2017 Ford Taurus SE 4-door
The Ford Taurus was redesigned for the 2010 model year. Beginning with the 2013 model year, the side curtain airbags were lengthened to improve occupant protection in small overlap frontal crashes.
Overall evaluation | |
---|---|
Structure and safety cage | |
Driver injury measures | |
Head/neck | |
Chest | |
Hip/thigh | |
Lower leg/foot | |
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics |
Action shot taken during the small overlap frontal crash test.
The dummy's position in relation to the door frame, steering wheel, and instrument panel after the crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was maintained reasonably well.
The frontal and side curtain airbags worked well together to keep the head from coming close to any stiff structure or outside objects that could cause injury.
Intrusion of the door hinge pillar, parking brake pedal, and instrument panel contributed to a significant risk of injury to the left lower leg.
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side
Test ID | CEN1711 |
---|---|
Lower occupant compartment | |
Lower hinge pillar max (cm) | 13 |
Footrest (cm) | 6 |
Left toepan (cm) | 5 |
Brake pedal (cm) | 3 |
Parking brake (cm) | 11 |
Rocker panel lateral average (cm) | 4 |
Upper occupant compartment | |
Steering column | 4 |
Upper hinge pillar max (cm) | 11 |
Upper dash (cm) | 9 |
Lower instrument panel (cm) | 8 |
Driver injury measures
Test ID | CEN1711 |
---|---|
Head | |
HIC-15 | 42 |
Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
Neck | |
Tension (kN) | 0.8 |
Extension bending moment (Nm) | 15 |
Maximum Nij | 0.18 |
Chest maximum compression (mm) | 20 |
Femur (kN) | |
Left | 2.2 |
Right | 0.0 |
Knee displacement (mm) | |
Left | 4 |
Right | 0 |
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%) | |
Left | 0 |
Right | 0 |
Maximum tibia index | |
Left | 1.19 |
Right | 0.41 |
Tibia axial force (kN) | |
Left | 2.5 |
Right | 0.0 |
Foot acceleration (g) | |
Left | 63 |
Right | 26 |
Moderate overlap front: original test
Rating applies to 2010-19 models
Tested vehicle: 2010 Ford Taurus Limited 4-door 4WD
The Ford Taurus was re-engineered and restyled for the 2010 model year. Moderate overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Ford.
Overall evaluation | |
---|---|
Structure and safety cage | |
Driver injury measures | |
Head/neck | |
Chest | |
Leg/foot, left | |
Leg/foot, right | |
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics |
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side
Test ID | VTF0821 |
---|---|
Footwell intrusion | |
Footrest (cm) | 5 |
Left (cm) | 6 |
Center (cm) | 7 |
Right (cm) | 7 |
Brake pedal (cm) | 3 |
Instrument panel rearward movement | |
Left (cm) | 3 |
Right (cm) | 2 |
Steering column movement | |
Upward (cm) | 1 |
Rearward (cm) | -2 |
A-pillar rearward movement (cm) | 1 |
Driver injury measures
Test ID | VTF0821 |
---|---|
Head | |
HIC-15 | 178 |
Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
Neck | |
Tension (kN) | 1.3 |
Extension bending moment (Nm) | 13 |
Maximum Nij | 0.33 |
Chest maximum compression (mm) | 39 |
Legs | |
Femur force - left (kN) | 0.3 |
Femur force - right (kN) | 0.2 |
Knee displacement - left (mm) | 2 |
Knee displacement - right (mm) | 1 |
Maximum tibia index - left | 0.36 |
Maximum tibia index - right | 0.59 |
Tibia axial force - left (kN) | 2.0 |
Tibia axial force - right (kN) | 1.4 |
Foot acceleration (g) | |
Left | 55 |
Right | 64 |
Side: original test
Rating applies to 2010-19 models
Tested vehicle: 2010 Ford Taurus SHO 4-door 4WD with standard front and rear head curtain airbags and standard front seat-mounted torso airbags
The Ford Taurus was re-engineered and restyled for the 2010 model year. Side ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Ford.
Overall evaluation | |
---|---|
Structure and safety cage | |
Driver injury measures | |
Head/neck | |
Torso | |
Pelvis/leg | |
Driver head protection | |
Rear passenger injury measures | |
Head/neck | |
Torso | |
Pelvis/leg | |
Rear passenger head protection |
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side
Test ID | VTS0802 |
---|---|
B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver's seat (cm) | -12.0 |
Negative numbers indicate the amount by which the crush stopped short of the seat centerline. |
Driver injury measures
Test ID | VTS0802 |
---|---|
Head HIC-15 | 123 |
Neck | |
Tension (kN) | 0.8 |
Compression (kN) | 0.5 |
Shoulder | |
Lateral deflection (mm) | 37 |
Lateral force (kN) | 1.4 |
Torso | |
Maximum deflection (mm) | 37 |
Average deflection (mm) | 31 |
Maximum deflection rate (m/s) | 4.00 |
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) | 0.50 |
Pelvis | |
Iliac force (kN) | 2.6 |
Acetabulum force (kN) | 2.7 |
Combined force (kN) | 5.1 |
Left femur | |
L-M force (kN) | 0.1 |
L-M moment (Nm) | 75 |
A-P moment (Nm) | 19 |
Passenger injury measures
Test ID | VTS0802 |
---|---|
Head HIC-15 | 207 |
Neck | |
Tension (kN) | 0.2 |
Compression (kN) | 0.4 |
Shoulder | |
Lateral deflection (mm) | 34 |
Lateral force (kN) | 1.6 |
Torso | |
Maximum deflection (mm) | 43 |
Average deflection (mm) | 33 |
Maximum deflection rate (m/s) | 5.10 |
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) | 0.80 |
Pelvis | |
Iliac force (kN) | 0.9 |
Acetabulum force (kN) | 3.3 |
Combined force (kN) | 3.6 |
Left femur | |
L-M force (kN) | 0.1 |
L-M moment (Nm) | 103 |
A-P moment (Nm) | 24 |
Roof strength
Rating applies to 2010-19 models
Tested vehicle: 2010 Ford Taurus SEL 4-door
Overall evaluation | |
---|---|
Curb weight | 3,972 lbs |
Peak force | 16,759 lbs |
Strength-to-weight ratio | 4.22 |
Head restraints & seats
Seat type: Power leather seats with 4-way head restraints
Overall evaluation | |
---|---|
Dynamic rating | |
Seat/head restraint geometry |
Seat type | Power leather seats with 4-way head restraints |
---|---|
Geometry | |
Backset (mm) | 20 |
Distance below top of head (mm) | 27 |
Seat design parameters | |
Pass/fail | Pass |
Max T1 acceleration (g) | 10.1 |
Head contact time (ms) | 57 |
Force rating | 1 |
Neck forces | |
Max neck shear force (N) | 42 |
Max neck tension (N) | 529 |
About the head restraint & seat test
Currently, IIHS tests apply only to front seats.
Headlights
Ratings are given for 3 different headlight variations available on this vehicle.
Trim level(s)
- SHO trim
Low-beam headlight type | HID projector |
---|---|
High-beam headlight type | HID projector |
Curve-adaptive? | No |
High-beam assist? | Yes |
Overall rating | |
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination: |
Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was inadequate on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was fair on the sharp right curve and inadequate on the gradual right and both left curves.
The low beams never exceeded glare limits.
High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the right side of the road and fair on the left side. On curves, visibility was fair on the gradual left and gradual right curves and inadequate on the sharp right and sharp left curves.
High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on the straightaway and all 4 curves.
Trim level(s) |
|
---|---|
Low-beam headlight type | HID projector |
High-beam headlight type | HID projector |
Curve-adaptive? | No |
High-beam assist? | Yes |
Overall rating Applies to 2017-19 models |
LOW BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) |
Amount glare exceeded threshold |
---|---|---|
Straightaway right edge | 48.9 m | None |
Straightaway left edge | 36.1 m | None |
250m radius right curve, left edge | 55.0 m | None |
250m radius left curve, left edge | 35.7 m | None |
150m radius right curve, right edge | 51.6 m | None |
150m radius left curve, right edge | 33.2 m | None |
HIGH BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) |
---|---|
Straightaway right edge | 145.2 m |
Straightaway left edge | 128.6 m |
250m radius right curve, right edge | 68.3 m |
250m radius left curve, left edge | 69.2 m |
150m radius right curve, right edge | 54.6 m |
150m radius left curve, left edge | 52.9 m |
Trim level(s)
- Limited trim
Low-beam headlight type | Halogen projector |
---|---|
High-beam headlight type | Halogen projector |
Curve-adaptive? | No |
High-beam assist? | Yes |
Overall rating | |
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination: |
Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was fair on the right side of the road and inadequate on the left side. On curves, visibility was inadequate in all 4 tests.
The low beams never exceeded glare limits.
High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was inadequate on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was inadequate in all 4 tests.
High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on the straightaway and on both left curves.
Trim level(s) |
|
---|---|
Low-beam headlight type | Halogen projector |
High-beam headlight type | Halogen projector |
Curve-adaptive? | No |
High-beam assist? | Yes |
Overall rating Applies to 2017-19 models |
LOW BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) |
Amount glare exceeded threshold |
---|---|---|
Straightaway right edge | 77.6 m | None |
Straightaway left edge | 41.1 m | None |
250m radius right curve, right edge | 45.2 m | None |
250m radius left curve, left edge | 40.6 m | None |
150m radius right curve, right edge | 37.4 m | None |
150m radius left curve, left edge | 35.6 m | None |
HIGH BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) |
---|---|
Straightaway right edge | 106.7 m |
Straightaway left edge | 74.2 m |
250m radius right curve, right edge | 44.9 m |
250m radius left curve, left edge | 48.1 m |
150m radius right curve, right edge | 37.2 m |
150m radius left curve, left edge | 37.9 m |
Trim level(s)
- SE trim
- SEL trim
Low-beam headlight type | Halogen projector |
---|---|
High-beam headlight type | Halogen projector |
Curve-adaptive? | No |
High-beam assist? | No |
Overall rating | |
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination: |
Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was fair on the right side of the road and inadequate on the left side. On curves, visibility was inadequate in all 4 tests.
The low beams never exceeded glare limits.
High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was inadequate on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was inadequate in all 4 tests.
Trim level(s) |
|
---|---|
Low-beam headlight type | Halogen projector |
High-beam headlight type | Halogen projector |
Curve-adaptive? | No |
High-beam assist? | No |
Overall rating Applies to 2017-19 models |
LOW BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) |
Amount glare exceeded threshold |
---|---|---|
Straightaway right edge | 77.6 m | None |
Straightaway left edge | 41.1 m | None |
250m radius right curve, right edge | 45.2 m | None |
250m radius left curve, left edge | 40.6 m | None |
150m radius right curve, right edge | 37.4 m | None |
150m radius left curve, left edge | 35.6 m | None |
HIGH BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) |
---|---|
Straightaway right edge | 106.7 m |
Straightaway left edge | 74.2 m |
250m radius right curve, right edge | 44.9 m |
250m radius left curve, left edge | 48.1 m |
150m radius right curve, right edge | 37.2 m |
150m radius left curve, left edge | 37.9 m |
Front crash prevention: vehicle-to-vehicle
Child seat anchors
Rating applies to 2015-19 models
Overall evaluation | |
Vehicle trim | Limited |
Seat type | leather |
This vehicle has 2 rear seating positions with complete child seat attachment (LATCH) hardware.
It has 1 additional seating position with a tether anchor and the ability to borrow lower anchors from the other seating positions.
Note: When anchors are borrowed, they aren't available to use in their designated positions.
Overall evaluation | |
Vehicle trim | Limited |
Seat type | leather |
G | Good |
A | Acceptable |
M | Marginal |
P | Poor |
Seating positions that rely on borrowed lower anchors or have only a tether anchor available are not rated. | |
thether anchor symbol | Tether anchor |
lower anchor symbol | Lower anchors |
Lower anchor(s) can be borrowed from adjacent positions(s) | |
No hardware available |
Details by seating position
1 | |
---|---|
Tether anchor | |
easy-to-find location | |
no other hardware could be confused for anchor | |
Lower anchors | |
too deep in seat | |
not too much force needed to attach | |
easy to maneuver around anchors | |
2 | |
Tether anchor | |
easy-to-find location | |
no other hardware could be confused for anchor | |
Lower anchors | |
Can be borrowed from 1 and 3 | |
3 | |
Tether anchor | |
easy-to-find location | |
no other hardware could be confused for anchor | |
Lower anchors | |
too deep in seat | |
not too much force needed to attach | |
easy to maneuver around anchors |
Seat position 21
Lower anchor A | |
---|---|
Open access rated | No |
Depth (cm) | 0-2 |
Force (lbs) | 12 |
Clearance angle (degrees) | 70 |
Lower anchor B | |
Open access rated | No |
Depth (cm) | 2-4 |
Force (lbs) | 23 |
Clearance angle (degrees) | 62 |
Tether anchor | |
Location | Rear deck |
Confusing hardware present | No |
Has contrasting label within 3 inches of tether anchor |
No |
Tether anchors can be accessed while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH |
Not measured |
Seat position 22
Lower anchor A | |
---|---|
Lower latch is shared for this seat position | |
Lower anchor B | |
Lower latch is shared for this seat position | |
Tether anchor | |
Location | Rear deck |
Confusing hardware present | No |
Has contrasting label within 3 inches of tether anchor |
No |
Tether anchors can be accessed while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH |
Not measured |
Seat position 23
Lower anchor A | |
---|---|
Open access rated | No |
Depth (cm) | 2-4 |
Force (lbs) | 18 |
Clearance angle (degrees) | 66 |
Lower anchor B | |
Open access rated | No |
Depth (cm) | 0-2 |
Force (lbs) | 17 |
Clearance angle (degrees) | 70 |
Tether anchor | |
Location | Rear deck |
Confusing hardware present | No |
Has contrasting label within 3 inches of tether anchor |
No |
Tether anchors can be accessed while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH |
Not measured |