2018 Hyundai Accent

minicar / 4-door sedan

Crashworthiness

Rating overview
Evaluation criteria	Rating
Small overlap front: driver-side
Small overlap front: passenger-side
Moderate overlap front: original test
Side: original test
Roof strength
Head restraints & seats

Crash avoidance & mitigation

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Headlights
Front crash prevention: vehicle-to-vehicle
Optional system	Superior

Seat belts & child restraints

Evaluation criteria	Rating
LATCH ease of use

Key

G
Good
A
Acceptable
M
Marginal
P
Poor

Superior
Advanced
Basic

Some ratings use a scale of Poor to Good. Others range from Basic to Superior.

Small overlap front: driver-side

Rating applies to 2018-22 models

Tested vehicle: 2018 Kia Rio LX 4-door

The Kia Rio and Hyundai Accent were redesigned for the 2018 model year and are now built on the same platform. The driver-side small overlap frontal ratings apply to both the sedan and hatchback versions of the Rio as well as to the Accent, available only as a sedan beginning with 2018 models.

Evaluation criteria	Rating

Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Hip/thigh
Lower leg/foot
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics

Action shot taken during the driver-side small overlap frontal crash test.

The dummy's position in relation to the door frame, steering wheel, and instrument panel after the crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was maintained very well.

The frontal and side curtain airbags worked well together to keep the head from coming close to any stiff structure or outside objects that could cause injury.

Forces on the left lower leg and foot were high enough to indicate a moderate risk of injuries.

Technical measurements for this test

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	CEN1802
Lower occupant compartment
Lower hinge pillar max (cm)	7
Footrest (cm)	4
Left toepan (cm)	3
Brake pedal (cm)	1
Parking brake (cm)
Rocker panel lateral average (cm)	2
Upper occupant compartment
Steering column	0
Upper hinge pillar max (cm)	6
Upper dash (cm)	5
Lower instrument panel (cm)	5

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	CEN1802
Head
HIC-15	208
Peak gs at hard contact	no contact
Neck
Tension (kN)	1.6
Extension bending moment (Nm)	9
Maximum Nij	0.34
Chest maximum compression (mm)	30
Femur (kN)
Left	1.4
Right	0.0
Knee displacement (mm)
Left	0
Right	0
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left	0
Right	0
Maximum tibia index
Left	0.88
Right	0.55
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left	4.4
Right	1.1
Foot acceleration (g)
Left	152
Right	60

About the small overlap front test

Small overlap front: passenger-side

Rating applies to 2018-22 models

Tested vehicle: 2018 Kia Rio S 4-door

The Kia Rio and Hyundai Accent were redesigned for the 2018 model year and are now built on the same platform. Passenger-side small overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Hyundai/Kia. Ratings apply to both the sedan and hatchback versions of the Rio as well as to the Accent, available only as a sedan beginning with 2018 models.

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Passenger injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Hip/thigh
Lower leg/foot
Passenger restraints and dummy kinematics The dummy’s head barely contacted the frontal airbag before sliding off the right side, leaving the head vulnerable to contact with forward structure. The side curtain airbag deployed and has sufficient forward coverage to protect the head from contact with side structure and outside objects.
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Hip/thigh
Lower leg/foot
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics

Technical measurements for this test

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	VTP1804
Lower occupant compartment
Lower hinge pillar max (cm)	7
Footrest (cm)	5
Right toepan (cm)	3
Center toepan (cm)	1
Rocker panel lateral average (cm)	4
Upper occupant compartment
Center dash (cm)	3
Upper hinge pillar max (cm)	6
Upper dash (cm)	5
Right lower dash (cm)	5

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	VTP1804
Head
HIC-15	248
Peak gs at hard contact	no contact
Neck
Tension (kN)	1.9
Extension bending moment (Nm)	15
Maximum Nij	0.36
Chest maximum compression (mm)	23
Femur (kN)
Left	0.3
Right	0.3
Knee displacement (mm)
Left	0
Right	0
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left	0
Right	0
Maximum tibia index
Left	0.36
Right	0.41
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left	2.1
Right	2.4
Foot acceleration (g)
Left	44
Right	73

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	VTP1804
Head
HIC-15	177
Peak gs at hard contact	no contact
Neck
Tension (kN)	0.6
Extension bending moment (Nm)	21
Maximum Nij	0.25
Chest maximum compression (mm)	28
Femur (kN)
Left	0.5
Right	0.3
Knee displacement (mm)
Left	0
Right	0
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left	0
Right	0
Maximum tibia index
Left	0.40
Right	0.30
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left	0.6
Right	1.2
Foot acceleration (g)
Left	61
Right	48

About the small overlap front test

Moderate overlap front: original test

Rating applies to 2018-22 models

Tested vehicle: 2018 Kia Rio LX 4-door (hatchback)

The Kia Rio and Hyundai Accent were redesigned for the 2018 model year and are now built on the same platform. Moderate overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Hyundai/Kia. Ratings apply to both the sedan and hatchback versions of the Rio as well as to the Accent, available only as a sedan beginning with 2018 models.

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Leg/foot, left
Leg/foot, right
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics

Technical measurements for this test

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	VTF1803
Footwell intrusion
Footrest (cm)	5
Left (cm)	10
Center (cm)	6
Right (cm)	3
Brake pedal (cm)	7
Instrument panel rearward movement
Left (cm)	0
Right (cm)	1
Steering column movement
Upward (cm)	-5
Rearward (cm)	-4
A-pillar rearward movement (cm)	0

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	VTF1803
Head
HIC-15	304
Peak gs at hard contact	no contact
Neck
Tension (kN)	1.1
Extension bending moment (Nm)	10
Maximum Nij	0.37
Chest maximum compression (mm)	34
Legs
Femur force - left (kN)	0.3
Femur force - right (kN)	0.3
Knee displacement - left (mm)	0
Knee displacement - right (mm)	0
Maximum tibia index - left	0.44
Maximum tibia index - right	0.43
Tibia axial force - left (kN)	2.2
Tibia axial force - right (kN)	2.9
Foot acceleration (g)
Left	46
Right	71

About the original moderate overlap front test

Side: original test

Rating applies to 2018-22 models

Tested vehicle: 2018 Kia Rio EX 4-door

The Kia Rio and Hyundai Accent were redesigned for the 2018 model year and are now built on the same platform. The side ratings apply to both the sedan and hatchback versions of the Rio as well as to the Accent, available only as a sedan beginning with 2018 models.

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Torso
Pelvis/leg
Driver head protection
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck
Torso
Pelvis/leg
Rear passenger head protection

View of the vehicle and barrier just after the crash test.

View of the vehicle after the crash with doors removed, showing the side airbags and damage to the occupant compartment.

Smeared greasepaint shows where the driver dummy's head was protected from being hit by hard structures by the side curtain airbag.

Smeared greasepaint shows where the rear passenger dummy’s head was protected by the side airbag.

Technical measurements for this test

Test ID	CES1801
B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver's seat (cm)	-14.5
Negative numbers indicate the amount by which the crush stopped short of the seat centerline.

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	CES1801
Head HIC-15	476
Neck
Tension (kN)	1.0
Compression (kN)	0.3
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm)	41
Lateral force (kN)	1.9
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm)	38
Average deflection (mm)	34
Maximum deflection rate (m/s)	7.84
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s)	0.92
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN)	0.5
Acetabulum force (kN)	1.6
Combined force (kN)	2.1
Left femur
L-M force (kN)	0.3
L-M moment (Nm)	87
A-P moment (Nm)	56

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	CES1801
Head HIC-15	220
Neck
Tension (kN)	0.2
Compression (kN)	0.7
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm)	32
Lateral force (kN)	1.6
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm)	31
Average deflection (mm)	27
Maximum deflection rate (m/s)	3.24
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s)	0.36
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN)	0.3
Acetabulum force (kN)	0.5
Combined force (kN)	0.6
Left femur
L-M force (kN)	1.1
L-M moment (Nm)	226
A-P moment (Nm)	-30

About the original side crash test

Roof strength

Rating applies to 2018-22 models

Tested vehicle: 2018 Kia Rio S 4-door

Rating applies to the Rio 4-door sedan (tested), Accent 4-door sedan, and the structurally similar Rio 4-door hatchback (5-door).

Overall evaluation
Curb weight	2,565 lbs
Peak force	14,544 lbs
Strength-to-weight ratio	5.67

About the roof strength test

Head restraints & seats

Seat type: Manual cloth seat

Overall evaluation
Dynamic rating
Seat/head restraint geometry

Technical measurements for this test

Seat type	Manual cloth seat
Geometry
Backset (mm)	32
Distance below top of head (mm)	12
Seat design parameters
Pass/fail	Pass
Max T1 acceleration (g)	15.3
Head contact time (ms)	57
Force rating	1
Neck forces
Max neck shear force (N)	0
Max neck tension (N)	611

About the head restraint & seat test
Currently, IIHS tests apply only to front seats.

Headlights

Trim level(s)

SE trim
SEL trim

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Low-beam headlight type	Halogen reflector
High-beam headlight type	Halogen reflector
Curve-adaptive?	No
High-beam assist?	No
Overall rating
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination:

Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was inadequate on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was inadequate in all 4 tests.

The low beams never exceeded glare limits.

High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the right side of the road and inadequate on the left side. On curves, visibility was inadequate in all 4 tests.

Technical measurements for this test

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Trim level(s)	SE trim SEL trim
Low-beam headlight type	Halogen reflector
High-beam headlight type	Halogen reflector
Curve-adaptive?	No
High-beam assist?	No
Overall rating Applies to 2018-22 models

LOW BEAMS	Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)	Amount glare exceeded threshold
Straightaway right edge	57.4 m	None
Straightaway left edge	29.2 m	None
250m radius right curve, right edge	47.9 m	None
250m radius left curve, left edge	34.2 m	None
150m radius right curve, right edge	40.0 m	None
150m radius left curve, left edge	30.4 m	None

HIGH BEAMS	Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)
Straightaway right edge	151.5 m
Straightaway left edge	103.2 m
250m radius right curve, right edge	56.4 m
250m radius left curve, left edge	52.8 m
150m radius right curve, right edge	42.7 m
150m radius left curve, left edge	40.7 m

About the headlight evaluation

Front crash prevention: vehicle-to-vehicle

System details

Optional Forward Collision-avoidance assist

Package name

Optional by trim (standard on Limited trim)

Overall evaluation

Applies to 2018-22 models

Superior

with optional equipment

This system meets the requirements for forward collision warning.
In the 12 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision.
In the 25 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision.

About the original front crash prevention test

Child seat anchors

Rating applies to 2018-22 models

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Overall evaluation
Vehicle trim	SEL
Seat type	cloth

This vehicle has 2 rear seating positions with complete child seat attachment (LATCH) hardware.

It has 1 additional seating position with a tether anchor only.

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Overall evaluation
Vehicle trim	SEL
Seat type	cloth

Rating icon	Rating
G	Good
A	Acceptable
M	Marginal
P	Poor
	Seating positions that rely on borrowed lower anchors or have only a tether anchor available are not rated.
thether anchor symbol	Tether anchor
lower anchor symbol	Lower anchors
shared lower achors symbol	Lower anchor(s) can be borrowed from adjacent positions(s)
	No hardware available

Details by seating position

Position	Rating
1
1	Tether anchor
	easy-to-find location
	no other hardware could be confused for anchor
	Lower anchors
	too deep in seat
	not too much force needed to attach
	easy to maneuver around anchors
2
2	Tether anchor
	easy-to-find location
	no other hardware could be confused for anchor
	Lower anchors
	none available
3
3	Tether anchor
	easy-to-find location
	no other hardware could be confused for anchor
	Lower anchors
	too deep in seat
	not too much force needed to attach
	easy to maneuver around anchors

Technical measurements for this test

Lower anchor A
Open access rated	No
Depth (cm)	2-4
Force (lbs)	19
Clearance angle (degrees)	82
Lower anchor B
Open access rated	No
Depth (cm)	2-4
Force (lbs)	15
Clearance angle (degrees)	87
Tether anchor
Location	Rear deck
Confusing hardware present	No
Has contrasting label within 3 inches of tether anchor	No
Tether anchors can be accessed while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH	Not measured

Lower anchor A
No lower latch for this seat position
Lower anchor B
No lower latch for this seat position
Tether anchor
Location	Rear deck
Confusing hardware present	No
Has contrasting label within 3 inches of tether anchor	No
Tether anchors can be accessed while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH	Not measured

Lower anchor A
Open access rated	No
Depth (cm)	2-4
Force (lbs)	21
Clearance angle (degrees)	73
Lower anchor B
Open access rated	No
Depth (cm)	2-4
Force (lbs)	16
Clearance angle (degrees)	71
Tether anchor
Location	Rear deck
Confusing hardware present	No
Has contrasting label within 3 inches of tether anchor	No
Tether anchors can be accessed while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH	Not measured

About the child seat anchor evaluation