Small overlap front: driver-side
Rating applies to 2015-17 models built after September 2014
Tested vehicle: 2015 Lexus CT 200h 4-door
The Lexus CT 200h was introduced in the 2011 model year and is derived from the Toyota Prius. Beginning with 2015 models built after September 2014, the front-end and door frame structure was modified to improve occupant protection in small overlap frontal crashes. (Information about when a specific vehicle was manufactured is on the certification label typically affixed to the car on the driver door or adjacent B-pillar.)
Overall evaluation | |
---|---|
Structure and safety cage | |
Driver injury measures | |
Head/neck | |
Chest | |
Hip/thigh | |
Lower leg/foot | |
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics |
Action shot taken during the small overlap frontal crash test.
The dummy's position in relation to the door frame, steering wheel, and instrument panel after the crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was maintained very well.
The frontal and side curtain airbags worked well together to keep the head from coming close to any stiff structure or outside objects that could cause injury.
The driver's space was maintained well, and risk of injuries to the dummy's legs and feet was low.
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side
Test ID | CEN1450 |
---|---|
Lower occupant compartment | |
Lower hinge pillar max (cm) | 5 |
Footrest (cm) | 4 |
Left toepan (cm) | 1 |
Brake pedal (cm) | 3 |
Parking brake (cm) | 9 |
Rocker panel lateral average (cm) | 1 |
Upper occupant compartment | |
Steering column | 1 |
Upper hinge pillar max (cm) | 3 |
Upper dash (cm) | 4 |
Lower instrument panel (cm) | 5 |
Driver injury measures
Test ID | CEN1450 |
---|---|
Head | |
HIC-15 | 142 |
Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
Neck | |
Tension (kN) | 1.2 |
Extension bending moment (Nm) | 12 |
Maximum Nij | 0.27 |
Chest maximum compression (mm) | 21 |
Femur (kN) | |
Left | 1.4 |
Right | 1.1 |
Knee displacement (mm) | |
Left | 1 |
Right | 1 |
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%) | |
Left | 0 |
Right | 0 |
Maximum tibia index | |
Left | 0.63 |
Right | 0.58 |
Tibia axial force (kN) | |
Left | 2.8 |
Right | 2.1 |
Foot acceleration (g) | |
Left | 47 |
Right | 51 |
Moderate overlap front: original test
Rating applies to 2011-17 models
Tested vehicle: 2011 Lexus CT 200h 4-door
The Lexus CT 200h was introduced in the 2011 model year and is derived from the Toyota Prius. Moderate overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Toyota.
Overall evaluation | |
---|---|
Structure and safety cage | |
Driver injury measures | |
Head/neck | |
Chest | |
Leg/foot, left | |
Leg/foot, right | |
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics |
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side
Test ID | VTF1101 |
---|---|
Footwell intrusion | |
Footrest (cm) | 6 |
Left (cm) | 12 |
Center (cm) | 18 |
Right (cm) | 7 |
Brake pedal (cm) | 8 |
Instrument panel rearward movement | |
Left (cm) | 3 |
Right (cm) | 2 |
Steering column movement | |
Upward (cm) | 0 |
Rearward (cm) | -2 |
A-pillar rearward movement (cm) | 2 |
Driver injury measures
Test ID | VTF1101 |
---|---|
Head | |
HIC-15 | 219 |
Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
Neck | |
Tension (kN) | 1.5 |
Extension bending moment (Nm) | 14 |
Maximum Nij | 0.29 |
Chest maximum compression (mm) | 18 |
Legs | |
Femur force - left (kN) | 2.4 |
Femur force - right (kN) | 2.6 |
Knee displacement - left (mm) | 2 |
Knee displacement - right (mm) | 2 |
Maximum tibia index - left | 0.37 |
Maximum tibia index - right | 0.51 |
Tibia axial force - left (kN) | 2.1 |
Tibia axial force - right (kN) | 2.7 |
Foot acceleration (g) | |
Left | 55 |
Right | 64 |
Side: original test
Rating applies to 2013-17 models
Tested vehicle: 2013 Lexus CT 200h 4-door with standard front and rear head curtain airbags and standard front seat-mounted torso airbags
The Lexus CT 200h was introduced in the 2011 model year and is derived from the Toyota Prius. Beginning with 2013 models, design changes were made to the rear door trim panels to improve occupant protection in side impact crashes.
Two tests of the CT 200h were conducted, one of a 2011 model by the Institute and the other representing a 2013 model by Toyota. These vehicles are rated separately, except that the structure ratings for both vehicles are based on both tests, as are driver dummy injury and head protection ratings, because no changes were made affecting front seat occupants. (The car tested by Toyota was designated as a 2011 model but included the rear door trim changes of the 2013 models.)
Overall evaluation | |
---|---|
Structure and safety cage | |
Driver injury measures | |
Head/neck | |
Torso | |
Pelvis/leg | |
Driver head protection | |
Rear passenger injury measures | |
Head/neck | |
Torso | |
Pelvis/leg | |
Rear passenger head protection |
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side
Test ID | CES1109 | VTS1220 |
---|---|---|
B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver's seat (cm) | -14.0 | -13.5 |
Negative numbers indicate the amount by which the crush stopped short of the seat centerline. |
Driver injury measures
Test ID | CES1109 | VTS1220 |
---|---|---|
Head HIC-15 | 287 | 240 |
Neck | ||
Tension (kN) | 0.6 | 0.7 |
Compression (kN) | 0.2 | 0.3 |
Shoulder | ||
Lateral deflection (mm) | 32 | 44 |
Lateral force (kN) | 1.9 | 1.4 |
Torso | ||
Maximum deflection (mm) | 22 | 28 |
Average deflection (mm) | 16 | 19 |
Maximum deflection rate (m/s) | 4.14 | 3.08 |
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) | 0.25 | 0.28 |
Pelvis | ||
Iliac force (kN) | 0.9 | 0.7 |
Acetabulum force (kN) | 1.1 | 2.5 |
Combined force (kN) | 1.9 | 3.2 |
Left femur | ||
L-M force (kN) | 0.6 | 0.8 |
L-M moment (Nm) | 166 | 121 |
A-P moment (Nm) | 52 | 195 |
Passenger injury measures
Test ID | VTS1220 |
---|---|
Head HIC-15 | 97 |
Neck | |
Tension (kN) | 0.3 |
Compression (kN) | 0.9 |
Shoulder | |
Lateral deflection (mm) | 48 |
Lateral force (kN) | 1.7 |
Torso | |
Maximum deflection (mm) | 33 |
Average deflection (mm) | 19 |
Maximum deflection rate (m/s) | 3.14 |
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) | 0.56 |
Pelvis | |
Iliac force (kN) | 0.4 |
Acetabulum force (kN) | 2.0 |
Combined force (kN) | 2.1 |
Left femur | |
L-M force (kN) | 1.4 |
L-M moment (Nm) | 41 |
A-P moment (Nm) | 127 |
Roof strength
Rating applies to 2011-17 models
Tested vehicle: 2011 Lexus CT 200h Premium 4-door
Overall evaluation | |
---|---|
Curb weight | 3,229 lbs |
Peak force | 16,238 lbs |
Strength-to-weight ratio | 5.03 |
Head restraints & seats
Seat type: Power leather seat
Overall evaluation | |
---|---|
Dynamic rating | |
Seat/head restraint geometry |
Seat type | Power leather seat |
---|---|
Geometry | |
Backset (mm) | 20 |
Distance below top of head (mm) | 10 |
Seat design parameters | |
Pass/fail | Pass |
Max T1 acceleration (g) | 11.4 |
Head contact time (ms) | 68 |
Force rating | 1 |
Neck forces | |
Max neck shear force (N) | 16 |
Max neck tension (N) | 570 |
About the head restraint & seat test
Currently, IIHS tests apply only to front seats.
Headlights
Trim level(s)
- All trims
Low-beam headlight type | Halogen projector |
---|---|
High-beam headlight type | Halogen reflector |
Curve-adaptive? | No |
High-beam assist? | No |
Overall rating | |
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination: |
Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was inadequate on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was inadequate in all 4 tests.
The low beams never exceeded glare limits.
High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was fair on the gradual right and gradual left curves and inadequate on the sharp right and sharp left curves.
Trim level(s) |
|
---|---|
Low-beam headlight type | Halogen projector |
High-beam headlight type | Halogen reflector |
Curve-adaptive? | No |
High-beam assist? | No |
Overall rating Applies to 2016-17 models |
LOW BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) |
Amount glare exceeded threshold |
---|---|---|
Straightaway right edge | 56.5 m | None |
Straightaway left edge | 28.3 m | None |
250m radius right curve, right edge | 44.1 m | None |
250m radius left curve, left edge | 30.8 m | None |
150m radius right curve, right edge | 39.4 m | None |
150m radius left curve, left edge | 29.9 m | None |
HIGH BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) |
---|---|
Straightaway right edge | 162.3 m |
Straightaway left edge | 156.4 m |
250m radius right curve, right edge | 73.6 m |
250m radius left curve, left edge | 71.4 m |
150m radius right curve, right edge | 51.8 m |
150m radius left curve, left edge | 49.9 m |
Front crash prevention: vehicle-to-vehicle
Child seat anchors
Rating applies to 2015-17 models
Overall evaluation | |
Vehicle trim | base |
Seat type | leather |
This vehicle has 2 rear seating positions with complete child seat attachment (LATCH) hardware.
It has 1 additional seating position with a tether anchor only.
Overall evaluation | |
Vehicle trim | base |
Seat type | leather |
G | Good |
A | Acceptable |
M | Marginal |
P | Poor |
Seating positions that rely on borrowed lower anchors or have only a tether anchor available are not rated. | |
thether anchor symbol | Tether anchor |
lower anchor symbol | Lower anchors |
Lower anchor(s) can be borrowed from adjacent positions(s) | |
No hardware available |
Details by seating position
1 | |
---|---|
Tether anchor | |
easy-to-find location | |
other hardware could be confused for anchor | |
Lower anchors | |
too deep in seat | |
not too much force needed to attach | |
difficult to maneuver around anchors | |
2 | |
Tether anchor | |
easy-to-find location | |
no other hardware could be confused for anchor | |
Lower anchors | |
none available | |
3 | |
Tether anchor | |
easy-to-find location | |
other hardware could be confused for anchor | |
Lower anchors | |
too deep in seat | |
not too much force needed to attach | |
difficult to maneuver around anchors |
Seat position 21
Lower anchor A | |
---|---|
Open access rated | No |
Depth (cm) | 2-4 |
Force (lbs) | 0 |
Clearance angle (degrees) | 56 |
Lower anchor B | |
Open access rated | No |
Depth (cm) | 4-6 |
Force (lbs) | 0 |
Clearance angle (degrees) | 49 |
Tether anchor | |
Location | Middle seatback |
Confusing hardware present | Yes |
Has contrasting label within 3 inches of tether anchor |
No |
Tether anchors can be accessed while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH |
Not measured |
Seat position 22
Lower anchor A | |
---|---|
No lower latch for this seat position | |
Lower anchor B | |
No lower latch for this seat position | |
Tether anchor | |
Location | Middle seatback |
Confusing hardware present | No |
Has contrasting label within 3 inches of tether anchor |
No |
Tether anchors can be accessed while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH |
Not measured |
Seat position 23
Lower anchor A | |
---|---|
Open access rated | No |
Depth (cm) | 4-6 |
Force (lbs) | 0 |
Clearance angle (degrees) | 43 |
Lower anchor B | |
Open access rated | No |
Depth (cm) | 4-6 |
Force (lbs) | 0 |
Clearance angle (degrees) | 52 |
Tether anchor | |
Location | Middle seatback |
Confusing hardware present | Yes |
Has contrasting label within 3 inches of tether anchor |
No |
Tether anchors can be accessed while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH |
Not measured |