2017 Nissan Rogue
small SUV / 4-door SUV
Award applies only to vehicles with optional front crash prevention and specific headlights
Small overlap front: driver-side
Rating applies to 2014-20 models
Tested vehicle: 2014 Nissan Rogue S 4-door 4wd
The Nissan Rogue was redesigned for the 2014 model year. The redesigned Rogue shares no ratings with the previous design, built since the 2008 model year and renamed the Rogue Select for 2014-15, after which it was discontinued.
| Overall evaluation | |
|---|---|
| Structure and safety cage | |
| Driver injury measures | |
| Head/neck | |
| Chest | |
| Hip/thigh | |
| Lower leg/foot | |
| Driver restraints and dummy kinematics |
Action shot taken during the small overlap frontal crash test.
The dummy's position in relation to the door frame, steering wheel, and instrument panel after the crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was maintained reasonably well.
The frontal and side curtain airbags worked well together to keep the head from coming close to any stiff structure or outside objects that could cause injury.
Intrusion into the driver's space was maintained reasonably well, and risk of injuries to the dummy's legs and feet was low.
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side
| Test ID | CEN1407 |
|---|---|
| Lower occupant compartment | |
| Lower hinge pillar max (cm) | 10 |
| Footrest (cm) | 3 |
| Left toepan (cm) | 2 |
| Brake pedal (cm) | 3 |
| Parking brake (cm) | 15 |
| Rocker panel lateral average (cm) | 2 |
| Upper occupant compartment | |
| Steering column | 3 |
| Upper hinge pillar max (cm) | 9 |
| Upper dash (cm) | 8 |
| Lower instrument panel (cm) | 9 |
Driver injury measures
| Test ID | CEN1407 |
|---|---|
| Head | |
| HIC-15 | 185 |
| Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
| Neck | |
| Tension (kN) | 1.3 |
| Extension bending moment (Nm) | 6 |
| Maximum Nij | 0.29 |
| Chest maximum compression (mm) | 27 |
| Femur (kN) | |
| Left | 1.9 |
| Right | 0.2 |
| Knee displacement (mm) | |
| Left | 2 |
| Right | 0 |
| Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%) | |
| Left | 0 |
| Right | 0 |
| Maximum tibia index | |
| Left | 0.46 |
| Right | 0.37 |
| Tibia axial force (kN) | |
| Left | 1.3 |
| Right | 0.6 |
| Foot acceleration (g) | |
| Left | 28 |
| Right | 26 |
Moderate overlap front: original test
Rating applies to 2014-20 models
Tested vehicle: 2014 Nissan Rogue S 4-door 4wd
The Nissan Rogue was redesigned for the 2014 model year. Two moderate overlap frontal tests of the Rogue were conducted, one by the Institute and the other by Nissan. Ratings are based on both tests.
The redesigned Rogue shares no ratings with the previous design, built since the 2008 model year and renamed the Rogue Select for 2014-15, after which it was discontinued.
| Overall evaluation | |
|---|---|
| Structure and safety cage | |
| Driver injury measures | |
| Head/neck | |
| Chest | |
| Leg/foot, left | |
| Leg/foot, right | |
| Driver restraints and dummy kinematics |
Action shot taken during the Institute's moderate overlap frontal crash test.
The dummy's position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after the crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was maintained well (Institute test car shown).
Smeared greasepaint shows where the driver dummy's head was protected from hitting hard structures during rebound by the side curtain airbag.
Intrusion into the driver's space was minimal in both tests, and all leg and foot injury measures were low.
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side
| Test ID | VTF1316 | CEF1402 |
|---|---|---|
| Footwell intrusion | ||
| Footrest (cm) | 11 | 4 |
| Left (cm) | 12 | 8 |
| Center (cm) | 11 | 8 |
| Right (cm) | 8 | 6 |
| Brake pedal (cm) | 5 | 2 |
| Instrument panel rearward movement | ||
| Left (cm) | 6 | 3 |
| Right (cm) | 4 | 1 |
| Steering column movement | ||
| Upward (cm) | 1 | 1 |
| Rearward (cm) | -2 | -3 |
| A-pillar rearward movement (cm) | 1 | 0 |
Driver injury measures
| Test ID | VTF1316 | CEF1402 |
|---|---|---|
| Head | ||
| HIC-15 | 282 | 353 |
| Peak gs at hard contact | no contact | no contact |
| Neck | ||
| Tension (kN) | 1.5 | 1.0 |
| Extension bending moment (Nm) | 22 | 33 |
| Maximum Nij | 0.25 | 0.30 |
| Chest maximum compression (mm) | 37 | 28 |
| Legs | ||
| Femur force - left (kN) | 0.3 | 0.5 |
| Femur force - right (kN) | 0.7 | 0.2 |
| Knee displacement - left (mm) | 1 | 0 |
| Knee displacement - right (mm) | 0 | 0 |
| Maximum tibia index - left | 0.41 | 0.38 |
| Maximum tibia index - right | 0.66 | 0.70 |
| Tibia axial force - left (kN) | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Tibia axial force - right (kN) | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| Foot acceleration (g) | ||
| Left | 133 | 95 |
| Right | 99 | 108 |
Side: original test
Rating applies to 2014-20 models
Tested vehicle: 2014 Nissan Rogue SV 4-door 4wd with standard front and rear head curtain airbags and standard front seat-mounted torso airbags
The Nissan Rogue was redesigned for the 2014 model year. Side ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Nissan.
The redesigned Rogue shares no ratings with the previous design, built since the 2008 model year and renamed the Rogue Select for 2014-15, after which it was discontinued.
| Overall evaluation | |
|---|---|
| Structure and safety cage | |
| Driver injury measures | |
| Head/neck | |
| Torso | |
| Pelvis/leg | |
| Driver head protection | |
| Rear passenger injury measures | |
| Head/neck | |
| Torso | |
| Pelvis/leg | |
| Rear passenger head protection | |
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side
| Test ID | VTS1317 |
|---|---|
| B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver's seat (cm) | -13.5 |
| Negative numbers indicate the amount by which the crush stopped short of the seat centerline. | |
Driver injury measures
| Test ID | VTS1317 |
|---|---|
| Head HIC-15 | 440 |
| Neck | |
| Tension (kN) | 0.2 |
| Compression (kN) | 0.3 |
| Shoulder | |
| Lateral deflection (mm) | 26 |
| Lateral force (kN) | 1.3 |
| Torso | |
| Maximum deflection (mm) | 25 |
| Average deflection (mm) | 23 |
| Maximum deflection rate (m/s) | 3.62 |
| Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) | 0.42 |
| Pelvis | |
| Iliac force (kN) | 1.9 |
| Acetabulum force (kN) | 2.4 |
| Combined force (kN) | 4.1 |
| Left femur | |
| L-M force (kN) | 0.6 |
| L-M moment (Nm) | 29 |
| A-P moment (Nm) | 119 |
Passenger injury measures
| Test ID | VTS1317 |
|---|---|
| Head HIC-15 | 162 |
| Neck | |
| Tension (kN) | 0.3 |
| Compression (kN) | 1.1 |
| Shoulder | |
| Lateral deflection (mm) | 38 |
| Lateral force (kN) | 1.4 |
| Torso | |
| Maximum deflection (mm) | 28 |
| Average deflection (mm) | 21 |
| Maximum deflection rate (m/s) | 2.22 |
| Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) | 0.36 |
| Pelvis | |
| Iliac force (kN) | 1.6 |
| Acetabulum force (kN) | 3.2 |
| Combined force (kN) | 4.2 |
| Left femur | |
| L-M force (kN) | 1.0 |
| L-M moment (Nm) | 25 |
| A-P moment (Nm) | 25 |
Roof strength
Rating applies to 2014-20 models
Tested vehicle: 2014 Nissan Rogue S 4-door 4wd
| Overall evaluation | |
|---|---|
| Curb weight | 3,530 lbs |
| Peak force | 17,189 lbs |
| Strength-to-weight ratio | 4.87 |
Head restraints & seats
Seat type: Manual cloth seat
| Overall evaluation | |
|---|---|
| Dynamic rating | |
| Seat/head restraint geometry |
| Seat type | Manual cloth seat |
|---|---|
| Geometry | |
| Backset (mm) | 9 |
| Distance below top of head (mm) | 16 |
| Seat design parameters | |
| Pass/fail | Pass |
| Max T1 acceleration (g) | 10.4 |
| Head contact time (ms) | 51 |
| Force rating | 1 |
| Neck forces | |
| Max neck shear force (N) | 0 |
| Max neck tension (N) | 333 |
About the head restraint & seat test
Currently, IIHS tests apply only to front seats.
Headlights
Ratings are given for 4 different headlight variations available on this vehicle.
Trim level(s)
- SL trim equipped with Premium package; built after October 2016
| Low-beam headlight type | LED projector |
|---|---|
| High-beam headlight type | LED projector |
| Curve-adaptive? | No |
| High-beam assist? | Yes |
|
Overall rating | |
| Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination: | |
Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was good on the gradual right curve and fair on the sharp right and both left curves.
The low beams created some glare.
High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was good on the gradual right and gradual left curves and fair on the sharp right and sharp left curves.
High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on the straightaway, on both left curves and on both right curves.
| Trim level(s) |
|
|---|---|
| Low-beam headlight type | LED projector |
| High-beam headlight type | LED projector |
| Curve-adaptive? | No |
| High-beam assist? | Yes |
|
Overall rating Applies to 2017-20 models built after October 2016 |
| LOW BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) |
Amount glare exceeded threshold |
|---|---|---|
| Straightaway right edge | 114.7 m | 12.3% |
| Straightaway left edge | 56.8 m | 12.3% |
| 250m radius right curve, right edge | 67.5 m | 10.0% |
| 250m radius left curve, left edge | 56.2 m | None |
| 150m radius right curve, right edge | 54.3 m | 7.5% |
| 150m radius left curve, left edge | 51.0 m | None |
| HIGH BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) |
|---|---|
| Straightaway right edge | 199.1 m |
| Straightaway left edge | 176.1 m |
| 250m radius right curve, right edge | 79.7 m |
| 250m radius left curve, left edge | 76.2 m |
| 150m radius right curve, right edge | 59.8 m |
| 150m radius left curve, left edge | 58.9 m |
Trim level(s)
- SL trim
| Low-beam headlight type | Halogen reflector |
|---|---|
| High-beam headlight type | Halogen reflector |
| Curve-adaptive? | No |
| High-beam assist? | Yes |
|
Overall rating | |
| Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination: | |
Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was inadequate on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was inadequate in all 4 tests.
The low beams never exceeded glare limits.
High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the right side of the road and fair on the left side. On curves, visibility was inadequate in all 4 tests.
High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on the straightaway and all 4 curves.
| Trim level(s) |
|
|---|---|
| Low-beam headlight type | Halogen reflector |
| High-beam headlight type | Halogen reflector |
| Curve-adaptive? | No |
| High-beam assist? | Yes |
|
Overall rating Applies to 2017-20 models |
| LOW BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) |
Amount glare exceeded threshold |
|---|---|---|
| Straightaway right edge | 74.2 m | None |
| Straightaway left edge | 37.1 m | None |
| 250m radius right curve, right edge | 42.5 m | None |
| 250m radius left curve, left edge | 37.6 m | None |
| 150m radius right curve, right edge | 36.5 m | None |
| 150m radius left curve, left edge | 33.1 m | None |
| HIGH BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) |
|---|---|
| Straightaway right edge | 146.3 m |
| Straightaway left edge | 130.2 m |
| 250m radius right curve, right edge | 61.8 m |
| 250m radius left curve, left edge | 59.9 m |
| 150m radius right curve, right edge | 47.2 m |
| 150m radius left curve, left edge | 45.8 m |
Trim level(s)
- S trim
- SV trim
| Low-beam headlight type | Halogen reflector |
|---|---|
| High-beam headlight type | Halogen reflector |
| Curve-adaptive? | No |
| High-beam assist? | No |
|
Overall rating | |
| Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination: | |
Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was inadequate on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was inadequate in all 4 tests.
The low beams never exceeded glare limits.
High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the right side of the road and fair on the left side. On curves, visibility was inadequate in all 4 tests.
| Trim level(s) |
|
|---|---|
| Low-beam headlight type | Halogen reflector |
| High-beam headlight type | Halogen reflector |
| Curve-adaptive? | No |
| High-beam assist? | No |
|
Overall rating Applies to 2017-19 models |
| LOW BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) |
Amount glare exceeded threshold |
|---|---|---|
| Straightaway right edge | 74.2 m | None |
| Straightaway left edge | 37.1 m | None |
| 250m radius right curve, right edge | 42.5 m | None |
| 250m radius left curve, left edge | 37.6 m | None |
| 150m radius right curve, right edge | 36.5 m | None |
| 150m radius left curve, left edge | 33.1 m | None |
| HIGH BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) |
|---|---|
| Straightaway right edge | 146.3 m |
| Straightaway left edge | 130.2 m |
| 250m radius right curve, right edge | 61.8 m |
| 250m radius left curve, left edge | 59.9 m |
| 150m radius right curve, right edge | 47.2 m |
| 150m radius left curve, left edge | 45.8 m |
Trim level(s)
- SL trim equipped with Premium package; built before November 2016
| Low-beam headlight type | LED projector |
|---|---|
| High-beam headlight type | LED projector |
| Curve-adaptive? | No |
| High-beam assist? | Yes |
|
Overall rating | |
| Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination: | |
Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was good on the gradual right curve and fair on the sharp right and both left curves.
The low beams created some glare.
High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was good on the gradual right and gradual left curves and fair on the sharp left and sharp right curves.
High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on the straightaway, on both left curves and on both right curves.
| Trim level(s) |
|
|---|---|
| Low-beam headlight type | LED projector |
| High-beam headlight type | LED projector |
| Curve-adaptive? | No |
| High-beam assist? | Yes |
|
Overall rating Applies to 2017 models built before November 2016 |
| LOW BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) |
Amount glare exceeded threshold |
|---|---|---|
| Straightaway right edge | 115.7 m | 21.9% |
| Straightaway left edge | 57.5 m | 21.9% |
| 250m radius right curve, right edge | 66.6 m | None |
| 250m radius left curve, left edge | 57.3 m | None |
| 150m radius right curve, right edge | 53.4 m | 14.2% |
| 150m radius left curve, left edge | 54.0 m | None |
| HIGH BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) |
|---|---|
| Straightaway right edge | 190.3 m |
| Straightaway left edge | 173.7 m |
| 250m radius right curve, right edge | 80.2 m |
| 250m radius left curve, left edge | 79.6 m |
| 150m radius right curve, right edge | 59.6 m |
| 150m radius left curve, left edge | 63.4 m |
Front crash prevention: vehicle-to-vehicle
Ratings are given for 2 different trim variations available on this vehicle.
Child seat anchors
Rating applies to 2015-18 models
| Overall evaluation | |
| Vehicle trim | S |
| Seat type | cloth |
This vehicle has 2 rear seating positions with complete child seat attachment (LATCH) hardware.
It has 1 additional seating position with a tether anchor only.
| Overall evaluation | |
| Vehicle trim | S |
| Seat type | cloth |
| G | Good |
| A | Acceptable |
| M | Marginal |
| P | Poor |
| Seating positions that rely on borrowed lower anchors or have only a tether anchor available are not rated. | |
thether anchor symbol | Tether anchor |
lower anchor symbol | Lower anchors |
| Lower anchor(s) can be borrowed from adjacent positions(s) | |
| No hardware available |
Details by seating position
| 1 | |
|---|---|
| Tether anchor | |
| easy-to-find location | |
| no other hardware could be confused for anchor | |
| Lower anchors | |
| too deep in seat | |
| not too much force needed to attach | |
| difficult to maneuver around anchors | |
| 2 | |
| Tether anchor | |
| hard-to-find location | |
| no other hardware could be confused for anchor | |
| Lower anchors | |
| none available | |
| 3 | |
| Tether anchor | |
| easy-to-find location | |
| no other hardware could be confused for anchor | |
| Lower anchors | |
| too deep in seat | |
| not too much force needed to attach | |
| difficult to maneuver around anchors |
Seat position 21
| Lower anchor A | |
|---|---|
| Open access rated | No |
| Depth (cm) | 4-6 |
| Force (lbs) | 21 |
| Clearance angle (degrees) | 47 |
| Lower anchor B | |
| Open access rated | No |
| Depth (cm) | 4-6 |
| Force (lbs) | 15 |
| Clearance angle (degrees) | 44 |
| Tether anchor | |
| Location | Middle seatback |
| Confusing hardware present | Yes |
| Has contrasting label within 3 inches of tether anchor |
Yes |
| Tether anchors can be accessed while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH |
Not measured |
Seat position 22
| Lower anchor A | |
|---|---|
| No lower latch for this seat position | |
| Lower anchor B | |
| No lower latch for this seat position | |
| Tether anchor | |
| Location | Roof |
| Confusing hardware present | No |
| Has contrasting label within 3 inches of tether anchor |
No |
| Tether anchors can be accessed while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH |
Not measured |
Seat position 23
| Lower anchor A | |
|---|---|
| Open access rated | No |
| Depth (cm) | 4-6 |
| Force (lbs) | 20 |
| Clearance angle (degrees) | 45 |
| Lower anchor B | |
| Open access rated | No |
| Depth (cm) | 4-6 |
| Force (lbs) | 23 |
| Clearance angle (degrees) | 47 |
| Tether anchor | |
| Location | Middle seatback |
| Confusing hardware present | Yes |
| Has contrasting label within 3 inches of tether anchor |
Yes |
| Tether anchors can be accessed while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH |
Not measured |