2009 Nissan Frontier

small pickup / Crew cab pickup

2009 Nissan Frontier Crew cab pickup
2008 Nissan Frontier shown

Crashworthiness

Rating overview
Moderate overlap front: original test
Side
Side: original test with optional side airbags
Side: original test without optional side airbags
Roof strength
Head restraints & seats

Key

  • G
    Good
  • A
    Acceptable
  • M
    Marginal
  • P
    Poor
  • Superior
  • Advanced
  • Basic

Some ratings use a scale of Poor to Good. Others range from Basic to Superior.

Moderate overlap front: original test

Rating applies to 2005-12 models

Tested vehicle: 2008 Nissan Frontier SE Crew Cab

The Nissan Frontier Crew Cab and King Cab were redesigned for the 2005 model year and are significantly larger and heavier than previous models. The Suzuki Equator Crew Cab and Extended Cab were introduced in the 2009 model year. Two tests of the Frontier were conducted, one by the Institute of a 2wd King Cab and the other by Nissan of a 2wd Crew Cab. The overall rating of Good is based on review of both tests, which independently result in overall ratings of Good. The ratings and vehicle specifications based on Nissan's test are shown below because the 2wd Crew Cab is similar to the configuration of other pickups tested more recently.

Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Leg/foot, left
Leg/foot, right
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics

Action shot taken during the Institute's frontal offset crash test.

The dummy's position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after the crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was maintained well (Institute test vehicle shown).

Dummy movement was well controlled in both tests. During rebound, the dummy's head hit only the head restraint.

In both tests, forces on the left knee and the right lower leg were high enough to indicate the possibility of injuries (Institute test shown).

Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test ID CEF0504 VTF0812
Footwell intrusion
Footrest (cm) 11 12
Left (cm) 12 13
Center (cm) 14 15
Right (cm) 12 13
Brake pedal (cm) 7 6
Instrument panel rearward movement
Left (cm) 1 0
Right (cm) 1 -1
Steering column movement
Upward (cm) 4 3
Rearward (cm) 0 1
A-pillar rearward movement (cm) 2 3

Driver injury measures

Test ID CEF0504 VTF0812
Head
HIC-15 255 252
Peak gs at hard contact no contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 1.5 1.4
Extension bending moment (Nm) 21 19
Maximum Nij 0.25 0.24
Chest maximum compression (mm) 34 35
Legs
Femur force - left (kN) 1.4 2.0
Femur force - right (kN) 0.0 1.0
Knee displacement - left (mm) 13 14
Knee displacement - right (mm) 0 2
Maximum tibia index - left 0.95 1.05
Maximum tibia index - right 0.35 0.58
Tibia axial force - left (kN) 2.4 3.2
Tibia axial force - right (kN) 4.3 4.4
Foot acceleration (g)
Left 111 140
Right 117 162

About the original moderate overlap front test

Side: original test

Rating applies to 2005-09 models

Tested vehicle: 2010 Nissan Frontier SE Crew Cab with standard front and rear head curtain airbags and standard front seat-mounted torso airbags

The Nissan Frontier was redesigned for the 2005 model year and is significantly larger and heavier than previous models. Side airbags became standard beginning with 2010 models (they had been optional in 2005-09 models). The Suzuki Equator was introduced in the 2009 model year with standard side airbags. Structure ratings are based on this test and on an earlier test of a 2008 Frontier model without side airbags.

Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Torso
Pelvis/leg
Driver head protection
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck
Torso
Pelvis/leg
Rear passenger head protection

View of the vehicle and barrier just after the crash test.

View of the vehicle after the crash with doors removed, showing the side airbags and damage to the occupant compartment.

Smeared greasepaint shows where the driver dummy's head was protected from being hit by hard structures by the side curtain airbag.

Smeared greasepaint shows where the rear passenger dummy’s head was protected by the side airbag.

Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test ID CES0819 CES0931
B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver's seat (cm) -15.0 -15.5
Negative numbers indicate the amount by which the crush stopped short of the seat centerline.

Driver injury measures

Test ID CES0931
Head HIC-15 107
Neck
Tension (kN) 1.0
Compression (kN) 0.2
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm) 40
Lateral force (kN) 1.1
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm) 39
Average deflection (mm) 37
Maximum deflection rate (m/s) 3.72
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) 0.61
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN) 0.8
Acetabulum force (kN) 2.6
Combined force (kN) 3.4
Left femur
L-M force (kN) 0.7
L-M moment (Nm) 140
A-P moment (Nm) -52

Passenger injury measures

Test ID CES0931
Head HIC-15 229
Neck
Tension (kN) 0.3
Compression (kN) 0.8
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm) 34
Lateral force (kN) 1.3
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm) 43
Average deflection (mm) 30
Maximum deflection rate (m/s) 4.35
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) 0.53
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN) 0.3
Acetabulum force (kN) 1.4
Combined force (kN) 1.4
Left femur
L-M force (kN) 0.5
L-M moment (Nm) 87
A-P moment (Nm) -26

Rating applies to 2005-09 models

Tested vehicle: 2008 Nissan Frontier LE Crew Cab without optional side airbags

The Nissan Frontier was redesigned for the 2005 model year and is significantly larger and heavier than previous models. The otherwise similar Suzuki Equator was introduced in the 2009 model year, but these ratings do not apply to the Equator because it has standard side airbags. Structure ratings are based on this test and on a later test of a 2010 Frontier model with side airbags.

Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Torso
Pelvis/leg
Driver head protection
The dummy's head was hit by its left arm stub. This impact did not produce high injury measures, but the head protection is inadequate.
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck
Torso
Pelvis/leg
Rear passenger head protection
The dummy's head was hit by the pillar behind the rear passenger door and the window glass of the rear door. These impacts did not produce high head injury measures, but the head protection is inadequate.

View of the vehicle and barrier just after the crash test.

View of the vehicle after the crash with doors removed, showing the damage to the occupant compartment.

Smeared yellow greasepaint shows where the driver dummy's head was hit by the arm stub.

Smeared greasepaint shows where the rear passenger dummy's head was hit by the pillar behind the rear door and the window glass.

Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test ID CES0819 CES0931
B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver's seat (cm) -15.0 -15.5
Negative numbers indicate the amount by which the crush stopped short of the seat centerline.

Driver injury measures

Test ID CES0819
Head HIC-15 62
Neck
Tension (kN) 1.3
Compression (kN) 0.0
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm) 32
Lateral force (kN) 1.5
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm) 59
Average deflection (mm) 42
Maximum deflection rate (m/s) 5.56
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) 1.62
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN) 1.6
Acetabulum force (kN) 3.3
Combined force (kN) 4.9
Left femur
L-M force (kN) 0.7
L-M moment (Nm) 118
A-P moment (Nm) -54

Passenger injury measures

Test ID CES0819
Head HIC-15 148
Neck
Tension (kN) 0.7
Compression (kN) 0.1
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm) 38
Lateral force (kN) 1.8
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm) 40
Average deflection (mm) 31
Maximum deflection rate (m/s) 3.33
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) 0.44
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN) 0.2
Acetabulum force (kN) 1.5
Combined force (kN) 1.5
Left femur
L-M force (kN) 0.6
L-M moment (Nm) 139
A-P moment (Nm) -42

About the original side crash test

Roof strength

Rating applies to 2005-15 models

Tested vehicle: 2010 Nissan Frontier SE Crew Cab

Rating applies to both the Nissan Frontier Crew Cab (tested) and the structurally similar 2009-12 models of the Suzuki Equator Crew Cab.

Overall evaluation
Curb weight 4,265 lbs
Peak force 17,535 lbs
Strength-to-weight ratio 4.11

About the roof strength test

Head restraints & seats

Seat type: Seats without adjustable lumbar AHR

Overall evaluation
Dynamic rating
Seat/head restraint geometry
Technical measurements for this test
Seat type Seats without adjustable lumbar AHR
Geometry
Backset (mm) 80
Distance below top of head (mm) 50
Seat design parameters
Pass/fail Fail
Max T1 acceleration (g) 12.8
Head contact time (ms) 81
Force rating 3
Neck forces
Max neck shear force (N) 195
Max neck tension (N) 876

Seat type: Seats with adjustable lumbar AHR

Overall evaluation
Dynamic rating
Seat/head restraint geometry
Technical measurements for this test
Seat type Seats with adjustable lumbar AHR
Geometry
Backset (mm) 65
Distance below top of head (mm) 58
Seat design parameters
Pass/fail Fail
Max T1 acceleration (g) 11.3
Head contact time (ms) 73
Force rating 3
Neck forces
Max neck shear force (N) 302
Max neck tension (N) 1,477

About the head restraint & seat test
Currently, IIHS tests apply only to front seats.