Top Safety Pick

2022 Ford Mustang Mach-E

midsize SUV / 4-door SUV

Award applies only to vehicles with specific headlights

Fully electric

2022 Ford Mustang Mach-E 4-door SUV — 2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E shown

Crashworthiness

Rating overview
Evaluation criteria	Rating
Small overlap front: driver-side
Small overlap front: passenger-side
Moderate overlap front: original test
Moderate overlap front: updated test
Side: original test
Side: updated test
Roof strength
Head restraints & seats

Crash avoidance & mitigation

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Headlights (varies by trim/option)
Front crash prevention: vehicle-to-vehicle
Standard system	Superior
Front crash prevention: pedestrian (day)
Standard system	Superior
Front crash prevention: pedestrian (night)
Standard system	Superior

Seat belts & child restraints

Evaluation criteria	Rating
LATCH ease of use

Other available safety features

Standard blind spot detection
Standard lane departure warning & prevention
Optional rear automatic braking

Key

G
Good
A
Acceptable
M
Marginal
P
Poor

Superior
Advanced
Basic

Some ratings use a scale of Poor to Good. Others range from Basic to Superior.

Small overlap front: driver-side

Rating applies to 2021-25 models

Tested vehicle: 2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E Select EV 4-door 4wd

The Ford Mustang Mach-E was introduced in the 2021 model year as the first electric SUV in Ford's lineup.

Evaluation criteria	Rating

Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Hip/thigh
Lower leg/foot
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics

Action shot taken during the small overlap frontal crash test.

The dummy's position in relation to the door frame, steering wheel, and instrument panel after the crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was maintained very well.

The frontal and side curtain airbags worked well together to keep the head from coming close to any stiff structure or outside objects that could cause injury.

The driver's space was maintained well, and risk of injuries to the dummy's legs and feet was very low.

Technical measurements for this test

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	CEN2102
Lower occupant compartment
Lower hinge pillar max (cm)	3
Footrest (cm)	3
Left toepan (cm)	3
Brake pedal (cm)	1
Parking brake (cm)
Rocker panel lateral average (cm)	1
Upper occupant compartment
Steering column	0
Upper hinge pillar max (cm)	3
Upper dash (cm)	2
Lower instrument panel (cm)	3

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	CEN2102
Head
HIC-15	80
Peak gs at hard contact	no contact
Neck
Tension (kN)	0.8
Extension bending moment (Nm)	18
Maximum Nij	0.18
Chest maximum compression (mm)	24
Femur (kN)
Left	0.2
Right	0.2
Knee displacement (mm)
Left	0
Right	1
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left	0
Right	0
Maximum tibia index
Left	0.52
Right	0.41
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left	2.3
Right	0.1
Foot acceleration (g)
Left	55
Right	28

About the small overlap front test

Small overlap front: passenger-side

Rating applies to 2021-25 models

Tested vehicle: 2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium EV 4-door 4wd

The Ford Mustang Mach-E was introduced in the 2021 model year as the first electric SUV in Ford's lineup. Passenger-side small overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of a 2021 Mach-E conducted by Ford.

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Passenger injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Hip/thigh
Lower leg/foot
Passenger restraints and dummy kinematics
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Hip/thigh
Lower leg/foot
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics

Technical measurements for this test

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	VTP2105
Lower occupant compartment
Lower hinge pillar max (cm)	3
Footrest (cm)	4
Right toepan (cm)	2
Center toepan (cm)	1
Rocker panel lateral average (cm)	1
Upper occupant compartment
Center dash (cm)	6
Upper hinge pillar max (cm)	5
Upper dash (cm)	4
Right lower dash (cm)	4

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	VTP2105
Head
HIC-15	85
Peak gs at hard contact	no contact
Neck
Tension (kN)	0.9
Extension bending moment (Nm)	11
Maximum Nij	0.19
Chest maximum compression (mm)	28
Femur (kN)
Left	0.1
Right	0.1
Knee displacement (mm)
Left	0
Right	0
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left	0
Right	0
Maximum tibia index
Left	0.39
Right	0.58
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left	0.9
Right	1.5
Foot acceleration (g)
Left	26
Right	56

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	VTP2105
Head
HIC-15	62
Peak gs at hard contact	no contact
Neck
Tension (kN)	0.7
Extension bending moment (Nm)	13
Maximum Nij	0.16
Chest maximum compression (mm)	30
Femur (kN)
Left	0.2
Right	0.2
Knee displacement (mm)
Left	1
Right	1
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left	0
Right	0
Maximum tibia index
Left	0.26
Right	0.22
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left	1.0
Right	0.2
Foot acceleration (g)
Left	30
Right	41

About the small overlap front test

Moderate overlap front: original test

Rating applies to 2021-23 models

Tested vehicle: 2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium EV 4-door 4wd

The Ford Mustang Mach-E was introduced in the 2021 model year as the first electric SUV in Ford's lineup.

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Leg/foot, left
Leg/foot, right
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics

Action shot taken during the moderate overlap frontal crash test.

The dummy's position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after the crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was maintained well.

Smeared greasepaint indicates where the dummy's head contacted the side curtain airbag during rebound.

Intrusion into the driver's space was minimal, and all leg and foot injury measures were low.

Technical measurements for this test

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	CEF2101
Footwell intrusion
Footrest (cm)	7
Left (cm)	10
Center (cm)	11
Right (cm)	9
Brake pedal (cm)	4
Instrument panel rearward movement
Left (cm)	0
Right (cm)	0
Steering column movement
Upward (cm)	-3
Rearward (cm)	-4
A-pillar rearward movement (cm)	0

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	CEF2101
Head
HIC-15	125
Peak gs at hard contact	no contact
Neck
Tension (kN)	0.9
Extension bending moment (Nm)	14
Maximum Nij	0.21
Chest maximum compression (mm)	32
Legs
Femur force - left (kN)	0.3
Femur force - right (kN)	0.3
Knee displacement - left (mm)	0
Knee displacement - right (mm)	0
Maximum tibia index - left	0.18
Maximum tibia index - right	0.26
Tibia axial force - left (kN)	1.9
Tibia axial force - right (kN)	1.6
Foot acceleration (g)
Left	43
Right	52

About the original moderate overlap front test

Moderate overlap front: updated test

Rating applies to 2021-25 models

Tested vehicle: 2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E Select EV 4-door 4wd

The Ford Mustang Mach-E was introduced in the 2021 model year as the first electric SUV in Ford's lineup.

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Thigh/hip
Leg/foot
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Thigh
Rear passenger restraints and dummy kinematics

View of the vehicle after the crash showing the airbags and damage to the occupant compartment.

The rear passenger dummy's head remained a safe distance from the front seatback.

Rear passenger dummy injury values indicate a low risk of injury to the head or neck and chest. During the crash, the shoulder belt remained in an ideal position on the dummy’s chest.

The rear passenger dummy's lap belt remained in the ideal position on the pelvis.

Technical measurements for this test

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	CEF2213
Footwell intrusion
Footrest (cm)	9
Left (cm)	12
Center (cm)	10
Right (cm)	10
Brake pedal (cm)	4
Instrument panel rearward movement
Left (cm)	0
Right (cm)	0
Steering column movement
Upward (cm)	-3
Rearward (cm)	-2
A-pillar rearward movement (cm)	0

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	CEF2213
Head
HIC-15	119
Peak gs at hard contact	no contact
Neck
Tension (kN)	0.9
Extension bending moment (Nm)	6
Maximum Nij	0.21
Chest maximum compression (mm)	29
Femur (kN)
Left	0.4
Right	0.3
Knee displacement (mm)
Left	1
Right	1
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left	0
Right	0
Maximum tibia index
Left	0.28
Right	0.31
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left	1.4
Right	1.6
Foot acceleration (g)
Left	34
Right	45

Test ID	CEF2213
Head
HIC-15 for head contact during forward excursion	no contact
Peak gs at hard contact	no contact
Neck
Tension (kN)	1.2
Compression (kN)	0.4
Maximum Nij for head contact during forward excursion	no contact
Chest
Chest index	30
Shoulder belt tension (kN)	4.0
Thigh (kN)
Left femur compression	0.1
Right femur compression	0.1

About the moderate overlap front test

February 2024 adjustment to rating criteria

Side: original test

Rating applies to 2021-23 models

Tested vehicle: 2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E Select EV 4-door 4wd

The Ford Mustang Mach-E was introduced in the 2021 model year as the first electric SUV in Ford's lineup.

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Torso
Pelvis/leg
Driver head protection
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck
Torso
Pelvis/leg
Rear passenger head protection

View of the vehicle just after the crash test.

View of the vehicle after the crash with doors removed, showing the side airbags and damage to the occupant compartment.

Smeared greasepaint shows where the driver dummy's head was protected from being hit by hard structures by the side curtain airbag.

Smeared greasepaint shows where the rear passenger dummy’s head was protected by the side airbag.

Technical measurements for this test

Test ID	CES2103
B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver's seat (cm)	-24.5
Negative numbers indicate the amount by which the crush stopped short of the seat centerline.

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	CES2103
Head HIC-15	140
Neck
Tension (kN)	0.9
Compression (kN)	0.4
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm)	30
Lateral force (kN)	0.9
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm)	37
Average deflection (mm)	32
Maximum deflection rate (m/s)	3.84
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s)	0.59
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN)	1.0
Acetabulum force (kN)	0.8
Combined force (kN)	1.7
Left femur
L-M force (kN)	0.2
L-M moment (Nm)	38
A-P moment (Nm)	-25

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	CES2103
Head HIC-15	34
Neck
Tension (kN)	0.6
Compression (kN)	0.3
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm)	16
Lateral force (kN)	0.9
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm)	12
Average deflection (mm)	11
Maximum deflection rate (m/s)	1.49
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s)	0.04
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN)	0.1
Acetabulum force (kN)	0.5
Combined force (kN)	0.6
Left femur
L-M force (kN)	0.5
L-M moment (Nm)	55
A-P moment (Nm)	-21

About the original side crash test

Side: updated test

Rating applies to 2021-25 models

Tested vehicle: 2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium EV 4-door 4wd

The Ford Mustang Mach-E was introduced in the 2021 model year as the first electric SUV in Ford's lineup. During the crash, the left rear passenger door opened. This opening didn't significantly affect vehicle crush or dummy movement. However, in some crashes, opening of vehicle doors could allow partial or complete occupant ejection, especially if the occupant is unbelted.

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Torso
Pelvis
Driver head protection
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck
Torso
Pelvis
Rear passenger head protection

View of the vehicle just after the crash test.

View of the vehicle after the crash with doors removed, showing the side airbags and damage to the occupant compartment.

Smeared greasepaint shows where the driver dummy's head was protected from being hit by hard structures by the side curtain airbag.

Smeared greasepaint shows where the rear passenger dummy’s head was protected by the side airbag.

Technical measurements for this test

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	CES2221
B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver's seat (cm)	-25.5
Negative numbers indicate the amount by which the crush stopped short of the seat centerline.

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	CES2221
Head
HIC-15	115
Peak gs at hard contact	no contact
Neck
Tension (kN)	1.6
Compression (kN)	0.2
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm)	36
Lateral force (kN)	1.2
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm)	36
Average deflection (mm)	34
Maximum deflection rate (m/s)	4.15
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s)	0.61
Pelvis
Combined force (kN)	3.7

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	CES2221
Head
HIC-15	42
Peak gs at hard contact	no contact
Neck
Tension (kN)	0.5
Compression (kN)	0.1
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm)	22
Lateral force (kN)	1.2
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm)	24
Average deflection (mm)	21
Maximum deflection rate (m/s)	1.61
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s)	0.20
Pelvis
Combined force (kN)	2.4

About the side crash test

Roof strength

Rating applies to 2021-23 models

Tested vehicle: 2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E Select EV 4-door 4wd

Overall evaluation
Curb weight	4,516 lbs
Peak force	28,037 lbs
Strength-to-weight ratio	6.21

About the roof strength test

Head restraints & seats

Seat type: Power leather seat

Overall evaluation
Dynamic rating
Seat/head restraint geometry

Technical measurements for this test

Seat type	Power leather seat
Geometry
Backset (mm)	18
Distance below top of head (mm)	12
Seat design parameters
Pass/fail	Pass
Max T1 acceleration (g)	10.8
Head contact time (ms)	55
Force rating	1
Neck forces
Max neck shear force (N)	32
Max neck tension (N)	615

About the head restraint & seat test
Currently, IIHS tests apply only to front seats.

Headlights

Ratings are given for 2 different headlight variations available on this vehicle.

Trim level(s)

Premium trim
GT trim

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Low-beam headlight type	LED projector
High-beam headlight type	LED projector
Curve-adaptive?	No
High-beam assist?	Yes
Overall rating
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination:

Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the left side of the road and fair on the right side. On curves, visibility was good on both right curves and fair on both left curves.

The low beams never exceeded glare limits.

High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was good on the gradual right and both left curves and fair on the sharp right curve.

High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on the straightaway, on both left curves and on the sharp right curve.

Technical measurements for this test

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Trim level(s)	Premium trim GT trim
Low-beam headlight type	LED projector
High-beam headlight type	LED projector
Curve-adaptive?	No
High-beam assist?	Yes
Overall rating Applies to 2021-23 models

LOW BEAMS	Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)	Amount glare exceeded threshold
Straightaway right edge	86.6 m	None
Straightaway left edge	58.7 m	None
250m radius right curve, right edge	71.0 m	None
250m radius left curve, left edge	57.4 m	None
150m radius right curve, right edge	58.1 m	None
150m radius left curve, left edge	54.7 m	None

HIGH BEAMS	Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)
Straightaway right edge	171.2 m
Straightaway left edge	170.3 m
250m radius right curve, right edge	82.5 m
250m radius left curve, left edge	81.4 m
150m radius right curve, right edge	62.9 m
150m radius left curve, left edge	65.6 m

Trim level(s)

Select trim
California Route 1 trim

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Low-beam headlight type	LED reflector
High-beam headlight type	LED reflector
Curve-adaptive?	No
High-beam assist?	Yes
Overall rating
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination:

Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was fair on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was good on the sharp right curve, fair on the sharp left and gradual right curves, and inadequate on the gradual left curve.

The low beams never exceeded glare limits.

High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the right side of the road and inadequate on the left side. On curves, visibility was fair on the sharp right curve and inadequate on the gradual right and both left curves.

High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on the straightaway, on both left curves and on the gradual right curve.

Technical measurements for this test

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Trim level(s)	Select trim California Route 1 trim
Low-beam headlight type	LED reflector
High-beam headlight type	LED reflector
Curve-adaptive?	No
High-beam assist?	Yes
Overall rating Applies to 2021-23 models

LOW BEAMS	Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)	Amount glare exceeded threshold
Straightaway right edge	87.4 m	None
Straightaway left edge	51.7 m	None
250m radius right curve, right edge	59.6 m	None
250m radius left curve, right edge	42.3 m	None
150m radius right curve, right edge	56.0 m	None
150m radius left curve, right edge	50.9 m	None

HIGH BEAMS	Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)
Straightaway right edge	149.6 m
Straightaway left edge	73.5 m
250m radius right curve, right edge	63.9 m
250m radius left curve, left edge	53.9 m
150m radius right curve, right edge	55.9 m
150m radius left curve, left edge	51.2 m

About the headlight evaluation

Front crash prevention: vehicle-to-vehicle

System details

Standard Pre-collision Assist with Automatic Emergency Braking

Overall evaluation

Applies to 2021-23 models

Superior

This system meets the requirements for forward collision warning.
In the 12 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision.
In the 25 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision.

About the original front crash prevention test

Front crash prevention: pedestrian (day)

System details

standard Pre-Collision Assist with Automatic Emergency Braking

Overall evaluation

This rating applies to all 2021-24 models

Superior

Crossing child

In the 12 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision.
In the 25 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision.

Crossing adult

In the 12 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision.
In the 25 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision.

Parallel adult

In the 25 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision.
In the 37 mph test, impact speed was reduced by 35 mph. A warning was issued 1.7 seconds before impact.

About the pedestrian front crash prevention test

Front crash prevention: pedestrian (night)

Night

System details

standard Pre-Collision Assist with Automatic Emergency Braking

Overall evaluation

Includes high-beam assist credit

This rating applies to 2021-24 models of the following trim lines: Premium trim, GT trim

Superior

Crossing adult

In the 12 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision when using its high beams. When using its low beams, this vehicle avoided a collision.
In the 25 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision when using its high beams. When using its low beams, this vehicle avoided a collision.

Parallel adult

In the 25 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision when using its high beams. When using its low beams, this vehicle avoided a collision.
In the 37 mph test, impact speed was reduced by 33 mph when using its high beams and a warning was issued 1.6 seconds before impact. When using its low beams, impact speed was reduced by 16 mph and a warning was issued 1 seconds before impact.

About pedestrian front crash prevention test

Child seat anchors

Rating applies to 2021-25 models

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Overall evaluation
Vehicle trim
Seat type	leather

This vehicle has 2 rear seating positions with complete child seat attachment (LATCH) hardware.

It has 1 additional seating position with a tether anchor only.

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Overall evaluation
Vehicle trim
Seat type	leather

Rating icon	Rating
G	Good
A	Acceptable
M	Marginal
P	Poor
	Seating positions that rely on borrowed lower anchors or have only a tether anchor available are not rated.
thether anchor symbol	Tether anchor
lower anchor symbol	Lower anchors
shared lower achors symbol	Lower anchor(s) can be borrowed from adjacent positions(s)
	No hardware available

Details by seating position

Position	Rating
1
1	Tether anchor
	easy-to-find location
	other hardware could be confused for anchor
	Lower anchors
	not too deep in seat
	not too much force needed to attach
	easy to maneuver around anchors
2
2	Tether anchor
	easy-to-find location
	other hardware could be confused for anchor
	Lower anchors
	none available
3
3	Tether anchor
	easy-to-find location
	other hardware could be confused for anchor
	Lower anchors
	not too deep in seat
	not too much force needed to attach
	easy to maneuver around anchors

Technical measurements for this test

Lower anchor A
Open access rated	No
Depth (cm)	0-2
Force (lbs)	17
Clearance angle (degrees)	80
Lower anchor B
Open access rated	No
Depth (cm)	0-2
Force (lbs)	16
Clearance angle (degrees)	76
Tether anchor
Location	Middle seatback
Confusing hardware present	Yes
Has contrasting label within 3 inches of tether anchor	No
Tether anchors can be accessed while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH	Not measured

Lower anchor A
No lower latch for this seat position
Lower anchor B
No lower latch for this seat position
Tether anchor
Location	Middle seatback
Confusing hardware present	Yes
Has contrasting label within 3 inches of tether anchor	No
Tether anchors can be accessed while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH	Not measured

Lower anchor A
Open access rated	No
Depth (cm)	0-2
Force (lbs)	22
Clearance angle (degrees)	75
Lower anchor B
Open access rated	No
Depth (cm)	0-2
Force (lbs)	16
Clearance angle (degrees)	78
Tether anchor
Location	Middle seatback
Confusing hardware present	Yes
Has contrasting label within 3 inches of tether anchor	No
Tether anchors can be accessed while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH	Not measured

About the child seat anchor evaluation