2025 Infiniti QX80

large SUV / 4-door SUV

2025 Infiniti QX80 4-door SUV

Crashworthiness

Rating overview
Small overlap front
Moderate overlap front: original test
Side: updated test

Crash avoidance & mitigation

Headlights
Front crash prevention: pedestrian
Standard system
Optional system

Seat belts & child restraints

Seat belt reminders

Other available safety features

  • Standard blind spot detection
  • Standard lane departure warning & prevention

Key

  • Good
  • Acceptable
  • Marginal
  • Poor

Small overlap front

The small overlap front evaluation consists of a driver-side and a passenger-side component. If the results of the two evaluations differ, then the combined small overlap rating is equal to the lower rating.

Driver-side

  • Rating applies to 2025 models

Tested vehicle: 2025 Infiniti QX80 Luxe 4-door 4wd

The Infiniti QX80 was redesigned for the 2025 model year. Driver-side small overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of a 2025 QX80 conducted by Nissan.

Overall driver-side evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Hip/thigh
Lower leg/foot
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics
Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test ID VTN2412
Lower occupant compartment
Lower hinge pillar max (cm) 15
Footrest (cm) 17
Left toepan (cm) 14
Brake pedal (cm) 19
Parking brake (cm)
Rocker panel lateral average (cm) 0
Upper occupant compartment
Steering column 5
Upper hinge pillar max (cm) 9
Upper dash (cm) 12
Lower instrument panel (cm) 15

Driver injury measures

Test ID VTN2412
Head
HIC-15 118
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 1.2
Extension bending moment (Nm) 12
Maximum Nij 0.20
Chest maximum compression (mm) 41
Femur (kN)
Left 2.3
Right 1.3
Knee displacement (mm)
Left 8
Right 2
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left 0
Right 0
Maximum tibia index
Left 0.51
Right 0.36
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left 2.3
Right 1.3
Foot acceleration (g)
Left 93
Right 86

Passenger-side

  • Rating applies to 2025 models

Tested vehicle: 2025 Infiniti QX80 Luxe 4-door 4wd

The Infiniti QX80 was redesigned for the 2025 model year. Passenger-side small overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of a 2025 QX80 conducted by Nissan.

Overall passenger-side evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Passenger injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Hip/thigh
Lower leg/foot
Passenger restraints and dummy kinematics
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Hip/thigh
Lower leg/foot
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics
Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on passenger side

Test ID VTP2414
Lower occupant compartment
Lower hinge pillar max (cm) 16
Footrest (cm) 13
Right toepan (cm) 9
Center toepan (cm) 4
Rocker panel lateral average (cm) 1
Upper occupant compartment
Center dash (cm) 7
Upper hinge pillar max (cm) 9
Upper dash (cm) 12
Right lower dash (cm) 12

Passenger injury measures

Test ID VTP2414
Head
HIC-15 81
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 1.0
Extension bending moment (Nm) 11
Maximum Nij 0.19
Chest maximum compression (mm) 24
Femur (kN)
Left 1.2
Right 3.4
Knee displacement (mm)
Left 4
Right 6
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left 0
Right 1
Maximum tibia index
Left 0.39
Right 0.69
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left 1.2
Right 1.4
Foot acceleration (g)
Left 60
Right 84

Driver injury measures

Test ID VTP2414
Head
HIC-15 56
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 0.6
Extension bending moment (Nm) 9
Maximum Nij 0.13
Chest maximum compression (mm) 28
Femur (kN)
Left 0.1
Right 0.1
Knee displacement (mm)
Left 1
Right 1
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left 0
Right 0
Maximum tibia index
Left 0.25
Right 0.25
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left 0.3
Right 0.1
Foot acceleration (g)
Left 41
Right 43

About the small overlap front test

Moderate overlap front: original test

Rating applies to 2025 models

Tested vehicle: 2025 Infiniti QX80 Luxe 4-door 4wd

The Infiniti QX80 was redesigned for the 2025 model year. Moderate overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of a 2025 QX80 conducted by Nissan.

Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Leg/foot, left
Leg/foot, right
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics
Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test ID VTF2407
Footwell intrusion
Footrest (cm) 3
Left (cm) 4
Center (cm) 8
Right (cm) 11
Brake pedal (cm) 4
Instrument panel rearward movement
Left (cm) 0
Right (cm) 0
Steering column movement
Upward (cm) 1
Rearward (cm) 1
A-pillar rearward movement (cm) 0

Driver injury measures

Test ID VTF2407
Head
HIC-15 142
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 0.9
Extension bending moment (Nm) 10
Maximum Nij 0.18
Chest maximum compression (mm) 31
Legs
Femur force - left (kN) 0.3
Femur force - right (kN) 0.1
Knee displacement - left (mm) 1
Knee displacement - right (mm) 3
Maximum tibia index - left 0.34
Maximum tibia index - right 0.27
Tibia axial force - left (kN) 1.7
Tibia axial force - right (kN) 1.4
Foot acceleration (g)
Left 57
Right 95

About the original moderate overlap front test

Side: updated test

Rating applies to 2025 models

Tested vehicle: 2025 Infiniti QX80 Luxe 4-door 4wd

The Infiniti QX80 was redesigned for the 2025 model year. Side 2.0 ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of a 2025 QX80 conducted by Nissan.

Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Torso
Pelvis
Driver head protection
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck
Torso
Pelvis
Rear passenger head protection
Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test ID VTS2422
B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver's seat (cm) -27.0
Negative numbers indicate the amount by which the crush stopped short of the seat centerline.

Driver injury measures

Test ID VTS2422
Head
HIC-15 17
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 0.4
Compression (kN) 0.4
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm) 12
Lateral force (kN) 0.8
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm) 15
Average deflection (mm) 13
Maximum deflection rate (m/s) 2.04
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) 0.08
Pelvis
Combined force (kN) 1.4

Passenger injury measures

Test ID VTS2422
Head
HIC-15 62
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 0.3
Compression (kN) 0.3
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm) 6
Lateral force (kN) 0.7
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm) 14
Average deflection (mm) 6
Maximum deflection rate (m/s) 1.53
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) 0.11
Pelvis
Combined force (kN) 0.7

About the side crash test

Headlights

Trim level(s)

  • All trims
Low-beam headlight typeLED projector
High-beam headlight typeLED projector
Curve-adaptive?No
High-beam assist?Yes
Overall rating
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination:
car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler 0 ft 100 ft 200 ft 300 ft 400 ft 500 ft 600 ft Low beams Optimal low-beam illumination High beams Optimal high-beam illumination High-beam assist credit

Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was good on both right curves and fair on both left curves.

The low beams never exceeded glare limits.

High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was good on both right curves and fair on both left curves.

High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on the straightaway and on both left curves.

Technical measurements for this test
Trim level(s)
  • All trims
Low-beam headlight type LED projector
High-beam headlight type LED projector
Curve-adaptive? No
High-beam assist? Yes
Overall rating
Applies to 2025 models
LOW BEAMS Average minimum useful
illumination distance (5 lux)
Amount glare
exceeded threshold
Straightaway right edge 98.6 m None
Straightaway left edge 67.7 m None
250m radius right curve, right edge 80.3 m None
250m radius left curve, left edge 59.1 m None
150m radius right curve, right edge 62.3 m None
150m radius left curve, left edge 48.0 m None
HIGH BEAMS Average minimum useful
illumination distance (5 lux)
Straightaway right edge 178.4 m
Straightaway left edge 159.3 m
250m radius right curve, right edge 90.5 m
250m radius left curve, left edge 72.0 m
150m radius right curve, right edge 71.0 m
150m radius left curve, left edge 60.2 m

About the headlight evaluation

Front crash prevention: pedestrian

Ratings are given for 2 different systems available on this vehicle.

Rating applies to all 2025 models

System details

  • standard ProPiILOT Assist 1.1
Overall evaluation
Includes high-beam assist credit

Crossing child — day

  • In the 12 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision.
  • In the 25 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision.

Crossing adult — night

  • In the 12 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision when using its high beams. When using its low beams, this vehicle avoided a collision.
  • In the 25 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision when using its high beams. When using its low beams, this vehicle avoided a collision.

Parallel adult — night

  • In the 25 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision when using its high beams. When using its low beams, this vehicle avoided a collision.
  • In the 37 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision when using its high beams and a warning was issued 2.2 seconds before impact. When using its low beams, impact speed was reduced by 27 mph and a warning was issued 1.7 seconds before impact.

Rating applies to all 2025 models

System details

  • optional ProPILOT Assist 2.1
Overall evaluation
Includes high-beam assist credit

Crossing child — day

  • In the 12 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision.
  • In the 25 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision.

Crossing adult — night

  • In the 12 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision when using its high beams. When using its low beams, this vehicle avoided a collision.
  • In the 25 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision when using its high beams. When using its low beams, this vehicle avoided a collision.

Parallel adult — night

  • In the 25 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision when using its high beams. When using its low beams, this vehicle avoided a collision.
  • In the 37 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision when using its high beams and a warning was issued 1.4 seconds before impact. When using its low beams, impact speed was reduced by 16 mph and a warning was issued 1 seconds before impact.

About the pedestrian front crash prevention test

Seat belt reminders

Rating applies to 2025 models

Overall evaluation
Front row
Unbelted occupant alert (audible & visual)
Initiation time
DurationLong enough (90+ seconds)
Volume
Audio frequency
Second row
Startup status alert (visual)
Initiation time
Duration at least 60 seconds
Belt disengaged alert (audible & visual)
Initiation time
Duration at least 30 seconds
Volume
Audio frequency
Technical measurements for this test
Background cabin sound pressure level at 24 km/h 50 dB
Audible signal sound pressure level at 24 km/h 69 dB
Difference between background and signal 19.1 dB
Background cabin sound pressure level at 40 km/h 53 dB
Audible signal sound pressure level at 40 km/h 69 dB
Difference between background and signal 16.0 dB
Dominant audio frequency 600 Hz

About the seat belt reminder evaluation