Top Safety Pick +

2022 Mazda CX-5

small SUV / 4-door SUV

Crashworthiness

Rating overview
Evaluation criteria	Rating
Small overlap front: driver-side
Small overlap front: passenger-side
Moderate overlap front: original test
Moderate overlap front: updated test
Side: original test
Side: updated test
Roof strength
Head restraints & seats

Crash avoidance & mitigation

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Headlights (varies by trim/option)
Front crash prevention: vehicle-to-vehicle
Standard system	Superior
Front crash prevention: pedestrian (day)
Standard system	Advanced

Seat belts & child restraints

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Seat belt reminders
LATCH ease of use

Other available safety features

Standard blind spot detection
Standard lane departure warning & prevention
Optional rear automatic braking

Key

G
Good
A
Acceptable
M
Marginal
P
Poor

Superior
Advanced
Basic

Some ratings use a scale of Poor to Good. Others range from Basic to Superior.

Small overlap front: driver-side

Rating applies to 2017-25 models

Tested vehicle: 2017 Mazda CX-5 Touring 4-door 4wd

The Mazda CX-5 was redesigned for the 2017 model year. Driver-side small overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Mazda.

Evaluation criteria	Rating

Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Hip/thigh
Lower leg/foot
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics

Technical measurements for this test

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	VTN1706
Lower occupant compartment
Lower hinge pillar max (cm)	4
Footrest (cm)	6
Left toepan (cm)	4
Brake pedal (cm)	6
Parking brake (cm)
Rocker panel lateral average (cm)	1
Upper occupant compartment
Steering column	1
Upper hinge pillar max (cm)	4
Upper dash (cm)	5
Lower instrument panel (cm)	6

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	VTN1706
Head
HIC-15	195
Peak gs at hard contact	no contact
Neck
Tension (kN)	1.5
Extension bending moment (Nm)	19
Maximum Nij	0.27
Chest maximum compression (mm)	24
Femur (kN)
Left	0.7
Right	0.3
Knee displacement (mm)
Left	0
Right	3
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left	0
Right	0
Maximum tibia index
Left	0.55
Right	0.40
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left	2.1
Right	1.9
Foot acceleration (g)
Left	53
Right	57

About the small overlap front test

Small overlap front: passenger-side

Rating applies to 2017-25 models

Tested vehicle: 2017 Mazda CX-5 Sport 4-door 4wd

The Mazda CX-5 was redesigned for the 2017 model year. Passenger-side small overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Mazda.

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Passenger injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Hip/thigh
Lower leg/foot
Passenger restraints and dummy kinematics
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Hip/thigh
Lower leg/foot
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics

Technical measurements for this test

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	VTP1719
Lower occupant compartment
Lower hinge pillar max (cm)	8
Footrest (cm)	9
Right toepan (cm)	7
Center toepan (cm)	2
Rocker panel lateral average (cm)	1
Upper occupant compartment
Center dash (cm)	4
Upper hinge pillar max (cm)	6
Upper dash (cm)	6
Right lower dash (cm)	6

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	VTP1719
Head
HIC-15	262
Peak gs at hard contact	no contact
Neck
Tension (kN)	0.8
Extension bending moment (Nm)	30
Maximum Nij	0.21
Chest maximum compression (mm)	19
Femur (kN)
Left	1.4
Right	1.9
Knee displacement (mm)
Left	0
Right	3
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left	1
Right	2
Maximum tibia index
Left	0.37
Right	0.59
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left	2.8
Right	2.8
Foot acceleration (g)
Left	50
Right	56

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	VTP1719
Head
HIC-15	70
Peak gs at hard contact	no contact
Neck
Tension (kN)	0.9
Extension bending moment (Nm)	18
Maximum Nij	0.26
Chest maximum compression (mm)	32
Femur (kN)
Left	0.3
Right	0.3
Knee displacement (mm)
Left	2
Right	1
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left	0
Right	0
Maximum tibia index
Left	0.31
Right	0.31
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left	0.3
Right	1.2
Foot acceleration (g)
Left	71
Right	38

About the small overlap front test

Moderate overlap front: original test

Rating applies to 2017-24 models

Tested vehicle: 2017 Mazda CX-5 Touring 4-door 4wd

The Mazda CX-5 was redesigned for the 2017 model year. Moderate overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Mazda.

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Leg/foot, left
Leg/foot, right
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics

Technical measurements for this test

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	VTF1709
Footwell intrusion
Footrest (cm)	1
Left (cm)	2
Center (cm)	5
Right (cm)	4
Brake pedal (cm)	2
Instrument panel rearward movement
Left (cm)	0
Right (cm)	-1
Steering column movement
Upward (cm)	-1
Rearward (cm)	-5
A-pillar rearward movement (cm)	0

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	VTF1709
Head
HIC-15	104
Peak gs at hard contact	no contact
Neck
Tension (kN)	1.1
Extension bending moment (Nm)	21
Maximum Nij	0.24
Chest maximum compression (mm)	31
Legs
Femur force - left (kN)	0.3
Femur force - right (kN)	0.8
Knee displacement - left (mm)	1
Knee displacement - right (mm)	1
Maximum tibia index - left	0.35
Maximum tibia index - right	0.50
Tibia axial force - left (kN)	1.7
Tibia axial force - right (kN)	1.5
Foot acceleration (g)
Left	48
Right	144

About the original moderate overlap front test

Moderate overlap front: updated test

Rating applies to 2021-22 models

Tested vehicle: 2021 Mazda CX-5 Sport 4-door 4wd

The Mazda CX-5 was redesigned for the 2017 model year.

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Thigh/hip
Leg/foot
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Thigh
Rear passenger restraints and dummy kinematics

View of the vehicle after the crash showing the airbags and damage to the occupant compartment.

The rear passenger dummy's head remained a safe distance from the front seatback.

Rear passenger dummy injury values indicate a likely risk of injury to the head or neck and chest. During the crash, the shoulder belt moved too far upward toward the dummy’s neck, compromising the effectiveness of the rear restraint system.

The rear passenger dummy's lap belt moved from the ideal position on the pelvis onto the abdomen, increasing the risk of abdominal injuries.

Technical measurements for this test

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	CEF2109
Footwell intrusion
Footrest (cm)	2
Left (cm)	3
Center (cm)	5
Right (cm)	5
Brake pedal (cm)	2
Instrument panel rearward movement
Left (cm)	0
Right (cm)	-1
Steering column movement
Upward (cm)	-3
Rearward (cm)	-2
A-pillar rearward movement (cm)	0

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	CEF2109
Head
HIC-15	126
Peak gs at hard contact	no contact
Neck
Tension (kN)	1.1
Extension bending moment (Nm)	21
Maximum Nij	0.27
Chest maximum compression (mm)	30
Femur (kN)
Left	0.3
Right	0.3
Knee displacement (mm)
Left	0
Right	0
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left	0
Right	0
Maximum tibia index
Left	0.30
Right	0.57
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left	1.7
Right	1.1
Foot acceleration (g)
Left	43
Right	77

Test ID	CEF2109
Head
HIC-15 for head contact during forward excursion	no contact
Peak gs at hard contact	no contact
Neck
Tension (kN)	3.7
Compression (kN)	0.3
Maximum Nij for head contact during forward excursion	no contact
Chest
Chest index	34
Shoulder belt tension (kN)	6.0
Thigh (kN)
Left femur compression	0.6
Right femur compression	0.5

About the moderate overlap front test

February 2024 adjustment to rating criteria

Side: original test

Rating applies to 2017-23 models

Tested vehicle: 2017 Mazda CX-5 Sport 4-door 2wd

The Mazda CX-5 was redesigned for the 2017 model year. Side ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Mazda.

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Torso
Pelvis/leg
Driver head protection
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck
Torso
Pelvis/leg
Rear passenger head protection

Technical measurements for this test

Test ID	VTS1707
B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver's seat (cm)	-23.0
Negative numbers indicate the amount by which the crush stopped short of the seat centerline.

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	VTS1707
Head HIC-15	209
Neck
Tension (kN)	0.8
Compression (kN)	0.1
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm)	20
Lateral force (kN)	1.1
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm)	27
Average deflection (mm)	23
Maximum deflection rate (m/s)	2.81
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s)	0.21
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN)	1.0
Acetabulum force (kN)	1.4
Combined force (kN)	2.4
Left femur
L-M force (kN)	0.9
L-M moment (Nm)	41
A-P moment (Nm)	70

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	VTS1707
Head HIC-15	152
Neck
Tension (kN)	0.1
Compression (kN)	0.8
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm)	28
Lateral force (kN)	1.6
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm)	20
Average deflection (mm)	17
Maximum deflection rate (m/s)	4.61
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s)	0.17
Pelvis
Iliac force (kN)	0.7
Acetabulum force (kN)	2.6
Combined force (kN)	3.0
Left femur
L-M force (kN)	0.3
L-M moment (Nm)	52
A-P moment (Nm)	-40

About the original side crash test

Side: updated test

Rating applies to 2017-25 models

Tested vehicle: 2021 Mazda CX-5 Sport 4-door 4wd

The Mazda CX-5 was redesigned for the 2017 model year. Two tests of 2021 CX-5 models were conducted. The injury ratings for the rear passenger are based on just the second test; measures for the rear passenger in the first test were not obtained because the dummy's arm stub dropped out of position just before the crash. The injury ratings for the driver and the structural ratings are based on both tests.

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Torso
Pelvis
Driver head protection
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck
Torso
Pelvis
Rear passenger head protection

View of the vehicle just after the second of two crash tests.

View of the vehicle after the second crash with doors removed, showing the side airbags and damage to the occupant compartment.

Smeared greasepaint shows where the driver dummy's head was protected from being hit by hard structures by the side airbags in the second test.

Smeared greasepaint shows where the rear passenger dummy’s head was protected by the side airbag in the second test.

Technical measurements for this test

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	CES2007	CES2108
B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver's seat (cm)	-17.0	-19.0
Negative numbers indicate the amount by which the crush stopped short of the seat centerline.

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	CES2007	CES2108
Head
HIC-15	165	155
Peak gs at hard contact	no contact	no contact
Neck
Tension (kN)	1.0	1.0
Compression (kN)	0.2	0.2
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm)	13	13
Lateral force (kN)	1.0	0.9
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm)	41	34
Average deflection (mm)	35	28
Maximum deflection rate (m/s)	2.34	2.72
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s)	0.46	0.46
Pelvis
Combined force (kN)	3.9	3.8

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Test ID	CES2108
Head
HIC-15	307
Peak gs at hard contact	no contact
Neck
Tension (kN)	0.1
Compression (kN)	1.1
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm)	36
Lateral force (kN)	1.9
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm)	32
Average deflection (mm)	28
Maximum deflection rate (m/s)	4.13
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s)	0.42
Pelvis
Combined force (kN)	2.7

About the side crash test

Roof strength

Rating applies to 2017-23 models

Tested vehicle: 2017 Mazda CX-5 Sport 4-door 4wd

Overall evaluation
Curb weight	3,498 lbs
Peak force	19,362 lbs
Strength-to-weight ratio	5.54

About the roof strength test

Head restraints & seats

Seat type: Manual cloth seat

Overall evaluation
Dynamic rating
Seat/head restraint geometry

Technical measurements for this test

Seat type	Manual cloth seat
Geometry
Backset (mm)	27
Distance below top of head (mm)	2
Seat design parameters
Pass/fail	Pass
Max T1 acceleration (g)	11.0
Head contact time (ms)	54
Force rating	1
Neck forces
Max neck shear force (N)	0
Max neck tension (N)	297

About the head restraint & seat test
Currently, IIHS tests apply only to front seats.

Headlights

Ratings are given for 3 different headlight variations available on this vehicle.

Trim level(s)

2.5 S Premium trim
2.5 S Premium Plus trim
2.5 Turbo trim
2.5 Turbo Signature trim

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Low-beam headlight type	LED projector
High-beam headlight type	LED projector
Curve-adaptive?	Yes
High-beam assist?	Yes
Overall rating
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination:

Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the right side of the road and fair on the left side. On curves, visibility was good on the sharp left and both right curves and fair on the gradual left curve.

The low beams created some glare.

High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was fair on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was good on the gradual left and gradual right curves and fair on the sharp left and sharp right curves.

High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on the straightaway and on both left curves.

Technical measurements for this test

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Trim level(s)	2.5 S Premium trim 2.5 S Premium Plus trim 2.5 Turbo trim 2.5 Turbo Signature trim
Low-beam headlight type	LED projector
High-beam headlight type	LED projector
Curve-adaptive?	Yes
High-beam assist?	Yes
Overall rating Applies to 2018-25 models

LOW BEAMS	Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)	Amount glare exceeded threshold
Straightaway right edge	119.5 m	None
Straightaway left edge	54.7 m	None
250m radius right curve, right edge	75.8 m	None
250m radius left curve, left edge	55.6 m	1.2%
150m radius right curve, right edge	68.2 m	None
150m radius left curve, left edge	55.2 m	6.1%

HIGH BEAMS	Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)
Straightaway right edge	139.8 m
Straightaway left edge	135.9 m
250m radius right curve, right edge	77.3 m
250m radius left curve, left edge	77.3 m
150m radius right curve, right edge	63.4 m
150m radius left curve, left edge	63.8 m

Trim level(s)

2.5 S trim

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Low-beam headlight type	LED projector
High-beam headlight type	LED projector
Curve-adaptive?	No
High-beam assist?	Yes
Overall rating
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination:

Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was good on the gradual right curve and fair on the sharp right and both left curves.

The low beams never exceeded glare limits.

High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the right side of the road and fair on the left side. On curves, visibility was fair on the gradual left curve and inadequate on the sharp left and both right curves.

High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on the straightaway and on the gradual left curve.

Technical measurements for this test

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Trim level(s)	2.5 S trim
Low-beam headlight type	LED projector
High-beam headlight type	LED projector
Curve-adaptive?	No
High-beam assist?	Yes
Overall rating Applies to 2018-23 models

LOW BEAMS	Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)	Amount glare exceeded threshold
Straightaway right edge	119.5 m	None
Straightaway left edge	57.7 m	None
250m radius right curve, right edge	67.6 m	None
250m radius left curve, right edge	56.6 m	None
150m radius right curve, right edge	54.9 m	None
150m radius left curve, left edge	53.5 m	None

HIGH BEAMS	Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)
Straightaway right edge	144.8 m
Straightaway left edge	137.8 m
250m radius right curve, right edge	61.6 m
250m radius left curve, left edge	66.2 m
150m radius right curve, right edge	48.2 m
150m radius left curve, left edge	49.5 m

Trim level(s)

2.5 S Select trim
2.5 S Preferred trim
2.5 S Carbon Edition trim

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Low-beam headlight type	LED projector
High-beam headlight type	LED projector
Curve-adaptive?	No
High-beam assist?	Yes
Overall rating
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination:

Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the right side of the road and fair on the left side. On curves, visibility was good on both right curves, fair on the sharp left curve and inadequate on the gradual left curve.

The low beams never exceeded glare limits.

High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the right side of the road and fair on the left side. On curves, visibility was inadequate in all 4 tests.

High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on the straightaway and on both left curves.

Technical measurements for this test

Evaluation criteria	Measurement
Trim level(s)	2.5 S Select trim 2.5 S Preferred trim 2.5 S Carbon Edition trim
Low-beam headlight type	LED projector
High-beam headlight type	LED projector
Curve-adaptive?	No
High-beam assist?	Yes
Overall rating Applies to 2018-25 models

LOW BEAMS	Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)	Amount glare exceeded threshold
Straightaway right edge	109.8 m	None
Straightaway left edge	48.4 m	None
250m radius right curve, right edge	66.5 m	None
250m radius left curve, right edge	47.4 m	None
150m radius right curve, right edge	55.8 m	None
150m radius left curve, left edge	46.5 m	None

HIGH BEAMS	Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)
Straightaway right edge	147.6 m
Straightaway left edge	136.8 m
250m radius right curve, right edge	64.1 m
250m radius left curve, left edge	61.9 m
150m radius right curve, right edge	49.6 m
150m radius left curve, left edge	48.2 m

About the headlight evaluation

Front crash prevention: vehicle-to-vehicle

System details

Standard Advanced Smart City Brake Support with Pedestrian Detection
Standard Smart Brake Support with Collision Warning

Overall evaluation

Applies to 2020-23 models

Superior

This system meets the requirements for forward collision warning.
In the 12 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision.
In the 25 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision.

About the original front crash prevention test

Front crash prevention: pedestrian (day)

System details

standard Smart Brake Support with Collision Warning and Advanced Smart City Brake Support with Pedestrian Detection

Overall evaluation

This rating applies to all 2018-25 models

Advanced

Crossing child

In the 12 mph test, impact speed was reduced by 10 mph.
In the 25 mph test, impact speed was reduced by 21 mph.

Crossing adult

In the 12 mph test, impact speed was reduced by 11 mph.
In the 25 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision.

Parallel adult

In the 25 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision.
In the 37 mph test, impact speed was reduced by 36 mph. A warning was issued 1.5 seconds before impact.

About the pedestrian front crash prevention test

Seat belt reminders

Rating applies to 2021-22 models

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Overall evaluation
Front row
Unbelted occupant alert (audible & visual)
Initiation time
Duration	Long enough (90+ seconds)
Volume
Audio frequency
Second row
Startup status alert (visual)
Initiation time
Duration at least 60 seconds
Belt disengaged alert (audible & visual)
Initiation time
Duration at least 30 seconds
Volume
Audio frequency

Technical measurements for this test

About the seat belt reminder evaluation

Child seat anchors

Rating applies to 2017-25 models

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Overall evaluation
Vehicle trim	Touring
Seat type	leatherette

This vehicle has 2 rear seating positions with complete child seat attachment (LATCH) hardware.

It has 1 additional seating position with a tether anchor and the ability to borrow lower anchors from the other seating positions.

Note: When anchors are borrowed, they aren't available to use in their designated positions.

Evaluation criteria	Rating
Overall evaluation
Vehicle trim	Touring
Seat type	leatherette

Rating icon	Rating
G	Good
A	Acceptable
M	Marginal
P	Poor
	Seating positions that rely on borrowed lower anchors or have only a tether anchor available are not rated.
thether anchor symbol	Tether anchor
lower anchor symbol	Lower anchors
shared lower achors symbol	Lower anchor(s) can be borrowed from adjacent positions(s)
	No hardware available

Details by seating position

Position	Rating
1
1	Tether anchor
	easy-to-find location
	no other hardware could be confused for anchor
	Lower anchors
	too deep in seat
	not too much force needed to attach
	easy to maneuver around anchors
2
2	Tether anchor
	easy-to-find location
	no other hardware could be confused for anchor
	Lower anchors
	Can be borrowed from 1 and 3
3
3	Tether anchor
	easy-to-find location
	no other hardware could be confused for anchor
	Lower anchors
	too deep in seat
	not too much force needed to attach
	easy to maneuver around anchors

Technical measurements for this test

Lower anchor A
Open access rated	No
Depth (cm)	4-6
Force (lbs)	3
Clearance angle (degrees)	68
Lower anchor B
Open access rated	No
Depth (cm)	4-6
Force (lbs)	8
Clearance angle (degrees)	56
Tether anchor
Location	Middle seatback
Confusing hardware present	Yes
Has contrasting label within 3 inches of tether anchor	Yes
Tether anchors can be accessed while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH	Not measured

Lower anchor A
Lower latch is shared for this seat position
Lower anchor B
Lower latch is shared for this seat position
Tether anchor
Location	Middle seatback
Confusing hardware present	Yes
Has contrasting label within 3 inches of tether anchor	Yes
Tether anchors can be accessed while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH	Not measured

Lower anchor A
Open access rated	No
Depth (cm)	4-6
Force (lbs)	9
Clearance angle (degrees)	59
Lower anchor B
Open access rated	No
Depth (cm)	4-6
Force (lbs)	6
Clearance angle (degrees)	72
Tether anchor
Location	Middle seatback
Confusing hardware present	Yes
Has contrasting label within 3 inches of tether anchor	Yes
Tether anchors can be accessed while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH	Not measured

About the child seat anchor evaluation

Background cabin sound pressure level at 24 km/h	51 dB
Audible signal sound pressure level at 24 km/h	58 dB
Difference between background and signal	7.1 dB
Background cabin sound pressure level at 40 km/h	55 dB
Audible signal sound pressure level at 40 km/h	60 dB
Difference between background and signal	5.2 dB
Dominant audio frequency	1500 Hz