Small overlap front
The small overlap front evaluation consists of a driver-side and a passenger-side component. If the results of the two evaluations differ, then the combined small overlap rating is equal to the lower rating.
Driver-side
- Rating applies to 2019-25 models
Tested vehicle: 2019 Nissan Altima 2.5 S 4-door
The Nissan Altima was redesigned for the 2019 model year. Driver-side small overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Nissan.
Overall driver-side evaluation | |
---|---|
Structure and safety cage | |
Driver injury measures | |
Head/neck | |
Chest | |
Hip/thigh | |
Lower leg/foot | |
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics |
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side
Test ID | VTN1816 |
---|---|
Lower occupant compartment | |
Lower hinge pillar max (cm) | 15 |
Footrest (cm) | 7 |
Left toepan (cm) | 3 |
Brake pedal (cm) | 1 |
Parking brake (cm) | 19 |
Rocker panel lateral average (cm) | 5 |
Upper occupant compartment | |
Steering column | 4 |
Upper hinge pillar max (cm) | 8 |
Upper dash (cm) | 8 |
Lower instrument panel (cm) | 8 |
Driver injury measures
Test ID | VTN1816 |
---|---|
Head | |
HIC-15 | 59 |
Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
Neck | |
Tension (kN) | 0.9 |
Extension bending moment (Nm) | 9 |
Maximum Nij | 0.16 |
Chest maximum compression (mm) | 19 |
Femur (kN) | |
Left | 0.4 |
Right | 0.5 |
Knee displacement (mm) | |
Left | 1 |
Right | 0 |
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%) | |
Left | 0 |
Right | 0 |
Maximum tibia index | |
Left | 0.53 |
Right | 0.45 |
Tibia axial force (kN) | |
Left | 0.9 |
Right | 0.4 |
Foot acceleration (g) | |
Left | 43 |
Right | 35 |
Passenger-side
- Rating applies to 2019-25 models
Tested vehicle: 2019 Nissan Altima 2.5 S 4-door
The Nissan Altima was redesigned for the 2019 model year. Passenger-side small overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Nissan.
Overall passenger-side evaluation | |
---|---|
Structure and safety cage | |
Passenger injury measures | |
Head/neck | |
Chest | |
Hip/thigh | |
Lower leg/foot | |
Passenger restraints and dummy kinematics | |
Driver injury measures | |
Head/neck | |
Chest | |
Hip/thigh | |
Lower leg/foot | |
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics |
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on passenger side
Test ID | VTP1833 |
---|---|
Lower occupant compartment | |
Lower hinge pillar max (cm) | 12 |
Footrest (cm) | 9 |
Right toepan (cm) | 3 |
Center toepan (cm) | 4 |
Rocker panel lateral average (cm) | 2 |
Upper occupant compartment | |
Center dash (cm) | 2 |
Upper hinge pillar max (cm) | 5 |
Upper dash (cm) | 5 |
Right lower dash (cm) | 5 |
Passenger injury measures
Test ID | VTP1833 |
---|---|
Head | |
HIC-15 | 52 |
Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
Neck | |
Tension (kN) | 0.7 |
Extension bending moment (Nm) | 14 |
Maximum Nij | 0.19 |
Chest maximum compression (mm) | 19 |
Femur (kN) | |
Left | 1.4 |
Right | 1.5 |
Knee displacement (mm) | |
Left | 2 |
Right | 0 |
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%) | |
Left | 0 |
Right | 0 |
Maximum tibia index | |
Left | 0.37 |
Right | 0.32 |
Tibia axial force (kN) | |
Left | 0.9 |
Right | 1.3 |
Foot acceleration (g) | |
Left | 29 |
Right | 38 |
Driver injury measures
Test ID | VTP1833 |
---|---|
Head | |
HIC-15 | 37 |
Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
Neck | |
Tension (kN) | 0.7 |
Extension bending moment (Nm) | 11 |
Maximum Nij | 0.13 |
Chest maximum compression (mm) | 23 |
Femur (kN) | |
Left | 0.3 |
Right | 0.2 |
Knee displacement (mm) | |
Left | 0 |
Right | 0 |
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%) | |
Left | 0 |
Right | 0 |
Maximum tibia index | |
Left | 0.19 |
Right | 0.32 |
Tibia axial force (kN) | |
Left | 0.7 |
Right | 0.8 |
Foot acceleration (g) | |
Left | 23 |
Right | 31 |
Moderate overlap front: original test
Rating applies to 2019-25 models
Tested vehicle: 2019 Nissan Altima 2.5 S 4-door
The Nissan Altima was redesigned for the 2019 model year. Moderate overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Nissan.
Overall evaluation | |
---|---|
Structure and safety cage | |
Driver injury measures | |
Head/neck | |
Chest | |
Leg/foot, left | |
Leg/foot, right | |
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics |
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side
Test ID | VTF1827 |
---|---|
Footwell intrusion | |
Footrest (cm) | 7 |
Left (cm) | 10 |
Center (cm) | 10 |
Right (cm) | 6 |
Brake pedal (cm) | 4 |
Instrument panel rearward movement | |
Left (cm) | 0 |
Right (cm) | 0 |
Steering column movement | |
Upward (cm) | 1 |
Rearward (cm) | -5 |
A-pillar rearward movement (cm) | 0 |
Driver injury measures
Test ID | VTF1827 |
---|---|
Head | |
HIC-15 | 155 |
Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
Neck | |
Tension (kN) | 0.9 |
Extension bending moment (Nm) | 25 |
Maximum Nij | 0.30 |
Chest maximum compression (mm) | 27 |
Legs | |
Femur force - left (kN) | 0.4 |
Femur force - right (kN) | 0.7 |
Knee displacement - left (mm) | 1 |
Knee displacement - right (mm) | 3 |
Maximum tibia index - left | 0.29 |
Maximum tibia index - right | 0.42 |
Tibia axial force - left (kN) | 1.7 |
Tibia axial force - right (kN) | 1.5 |
Foot acceleration (g) | |
Left | 47 |
Right | 56 |
Moderate overlap front: updated test
Rating applies to 2024-25 models
Tested vehicle: 2024 Nissan Altima 2.5 S 4-door
The Nissan Altima was redesigned for the 2019 model year. Beginning with 2024 models, improvements were made to the rear seatbelts to improve occupant safety for rear passengers in moderate overlap front crashes.
Overall evaluation | |
---|---|
Structure and safety cage | |
Driver injury measures | |
Head/neck | |
Chest | |
Thigh/hip | |
Leg/foot | |
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics | |
Rear passenger injury measures | |
Head/neck | |
Chest | |
Thigh | |
Rear passenger restraints and dummy kinematics
|
View of the vehicle after the crash showing the airbags and damage to the occupant compartment.
The rear passenger dummy's head remained a safe distance from the front seatback.
Rear passenger dummy injury values indicate a low risk of injury to the head or neck and chest but during the crash, the shoulder belt moved too far upward toward the dummy’s neck, compromising the effectiveness of the rear restraint system.
The rear passenger dummy's lap belt moved from the ideal position on the pelvis onto the abdomen, increasing the risk of abdominal injuries.
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side
Test ID | CEF2442 |
---|---|
Footwell intrusion | |
Footrest (cm) | 8 |
Left (cm) | 13 |
Center (cm) | 13 |
Right (cm) | 11 |
Brake pedal (cm) | 6 |
Instrument panel rearward movement | |
Left (cm) | 3 |
Right (cm) | 3 |
Steering column movement | |
Upward (cm) | 2 |
Rearward (cm) | 0 |
A-pillar rearward movement (cm) | 1 |
Driver injury measures
Test ID | CEF2442 |
---|---|
Head | |
HIC-15 | 119 |
Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
Neck | |
Tension (kN) | 1.0 |
Extension bending moment (Nm) | 17 |
Maximum Nij | 0.22 |
Chest maximum compression (mm) | 27 |
Femur (kN) | |
Left | 0.7 |
Right | 1.0 |
Knee displacement (mm) | |
Left | 2 |
Right | 4 |
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%) | |
Left | 0 |
Right | 0 |
Maximum tibia index | |
Left | 0.48 |
Right | 0.58 |
Tibia axial force (kN) | |
Left | 1.8 |
Right | 1.7 |
Foot acceleration (g) | |
Left | 54 |
Right | 59 |
Rear passenger injury measures
Test ID | CEF2442 |
---|---|
Head | |
HIC-15 for head contact during forward excursion |
no contact
|
Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
Neck | |
Tension (kN) | 1.4 |
Compression (kN) | 0.4 |
Maximum Nij for head contact during forward excursion |
no contact
|
Chest | |
Chest index | 32 |
Shoulder belt tension (kN) | 3.7 |
Thigh (kN) | |
Left femur compression | 0.3 |
Right femur compression | 0.3 |
Side: original test
Rating applies to 2022-25 models
Tested vehicle: 2022 Nissan Altima 2.5 SV 4-door
The Nissan Altima was redesigned for the 2019 model year. Beginning with 2022 models, side curtain airbags were enlarged and door sill and pillar reinforcements were implemented to improve occupant protection in side impact crashes. Side ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of a 2022 Altima conducted by Nissan.
Overall evaluation | |
---|---|
Structure and safety cage | |
Driver injury measures | |
Head/neck | |
Torso | |
Pelvis/leg | |
Driver head protection | |
Rear passenger injury measures | |
Head/neck | |
Torso | |
Pelvis/leg | |
Rear passenger head protection |
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side
Test ID | VTS2112 |
---|---|
B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver's seat (cm) | -25.0 |
Negative numbers indicate the amount by which the crush stopped short of the seat centerline. |
Driver injury measures
Test ID | VTS2112 |
---|---|
Head HIC-15 | 175 |
Neck | |
Tension (kN) | 1.0 |
Compression (kN) | 0.6 |
Shoulder | |
Lateral deflection (mm) | 36 |
Lateral force (kN) | 1.7 |
Torso | |
Maximum deflection (mm) | 37 |
Average deflection (mm) | 33 |
Maximum deflection rate (m/s) | 2.85 |
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) | 0.44 |
Pelvis | |
Iliac force (kN) | 1.4 |
Acetabulum force (kN) | 1.2 |
Combined force (kN) | 2.4 |
Left femur | |
L-M force (kN) | 1.0 |
L-M moment (Nm) | 162 |
A-P moment (Nm) | 36 |
Passenger injury measures
Test ID | VTS2112 |
---|---|
Head HIC-15 | 107 |
Neck | |
Tension (kN) | 0.2 |
Compression (kN) | 0.4 |
Shoulder | |
Lateral deflection (mm) | 26 |
Lateral force (kN) | 1.2 |
Torso | |
Maximum deflection (mm) | 17 |
Average deflection (mm) | 16 |
Maximum deflection rate (m/s) | 2.92 |
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) | 0.20 |
Pelvis | |
Iliac force (kN) | 0.5 |
Acetabulum force (kN) | 1.8 |
Combined force (kN) | 2.0 |
Left femur | |
L-M force (kN) | 0.4 |
L-M moment (Nm) | 105 |
A-P moment (Nm) | -32 |
Side: updated test
Rating applies to 2022-25 models
Tested vehicle: 2022 Nissan Altima 2.5 S 4-door
The Nissan Altima was redesigned for the 2019 model year. Beginning with 2022 models, side curtain airbags were enlarged and door sill and pillar reinforcements were implemented to improve occupant protection in side impact crashes. Two side impact 2.0 tests were conducted because rear dummy injury data was not recorded in the first test. Rear passenger injury measures are from the second test. Driver injury measures and structure ratings are based on both tests.
Overall evaluation | |
---|---|
Structure and safety cage | |
Driver injury measures | |
Head/neck | |
Torso | |
Pelvis | |
Driver head protection
The dummy's head moved downward past the side curtain airbag and struck the window sill of the driver door hard. The head protection is inadequate. | |
Rear passenger injury measures | |
Head/neck | |
Torso | |
Pelvis | |
Rear passenger head protection |
View of the vehicle just after the crash test.
View of the vehicle after the crash with doors removed, showing the side airbags and damage to the occupant compartment.
Smeared greasepaint shows that the driver dummy's head moved downward, past the side curtain airbag, and contacted the window sill.
Smeared greasepaint shown is on the upper/outboard seatback. The rear passenger dummy’s head was protected by the side airbags.
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side
Test ID | CES2223 | CES2216 |
---|---|---|
B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver's seat (cm) | -7.5 | -9.0 |
Negative numbers indicate the amount by which the crush stopped short of the seat centerline. |
Driver injury measures
Test ID | CES2223 | CES2216 |
---|---|---|
Head | ||
HIC-15 | 562 | 667 |
Peak gs at hard contact | 109 | no contact |
Neck | ||
Tension (kN) | 2.8 | 2.5 |
Compression (kN) | 0.1 | 0.3 |
Shoulder | ||
Lateral deflection (mm) | 53 | 51 |
Lateral force (kN) | 1.8 | 2.0 |
Torso | ||
Maximum deflection (mm) | 56 | 52 |
Average deflection (mm) | 51 | 49 |
Maximum deflection rate (m/s) | 4.74 | 4.81 |
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) | 1.36 | 1.35 |
Pelvis | ||
Combined force (kN) | 6.0 | 6.2 |
Passenger injury measures
Test ID | CES2223 |
---|---|
Head | |
HIC-15 | 122 |
Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
Neck | |
Tension (kN) | 0.9 |
Compression (kN) | 0.1 |
Shoulder | |
Lateral deflection (mm) | 27 |
Lateral force (kN) | 1.3 |
Torso | |
Maximum deflection (mm) | 26 |
Average deflection (mm) | 21 |
Maximum deflection rate (m/s) | 3.33 |
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) | 0.28 |
Pelvis | |
Combined force (kN) | 4.0 |
Headlights
Trim level(s)
- All trims
Low-beam headlight type | LED projector |
---|---|
High-beam headlight type | LED projector |
Curve-adaptive? | No |
High-beam assist? | Yes |
Overall rating | |
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination: |
Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the right side of the road and fair on the left side. On curves, visibility was fair on the sharp left and both right curves and inadequate on the gradual left curve.
The low beams never exceeded glare limits.
High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was fair on the gradual left curve and inadequate on the sharp left and both right curves.
High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on the straightaway and on both left curves.
Trim level(s) |
|
---|---|
Low-beam headlight type | LED projector |
High-beam headlight type | LED projector |
Curve-adaptive? | No |
High-beam assist? | Yes |
Overall rating Applies to 2019-25 models |
LOW BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) |
Amount glare exceeded threshold |
---|---|---|
Straightaway right edge | 123.5 m | None |
Straightaway left edge | 50.6 m | None |
250m radius right curve, right edge | 63.2 m | None |
250m radius left curve, right edge | 46.8 m | None |
150m radius right curve, right edge | 50.2 m | None |
150m radius left curve, right edge | 48.4 m | None |
HIGH BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) |
---|---|
Straightaway right edge | 159.7 m |
Straightaway left edge | 149.3 m |
250m radius right curve, right edge | 63.2 m |
250m radius left curve, left edge | 65.5 m |
150m radius right curve, right edge | 49.9 m |
150m radius left curve, left edge | 50.2 m |
Front crash prevention: pedestrian
Seat belt reminders
Rating applies to 2023-25 models
Overall evaluation | |
---|---|
Front row | |
Unbelted occupant alert (audible & visual) | |
Initiation time | |
Duration | Long enough (90+ seconds) |
Volume | |
Audio frequency | |
Second row | |
Startup status alert (visual) | |
Initiation time | |
Duration at least 60 seconds | |
Belt disengaged alert (audible & visual) | |
Initiation time | |
Duration at least 30 seconds | |
Volume | |
Audio frequency |
Background cabin sound pressure level at 24 km/h | 51 dB |
Audible signal sound pressure level at 24 km/h | 64 dB |
Difference between background and signal | 12.4 dB |
Background cabin sound pressure level at 40 km/h | 55 dB |
Audible signal sound pressure level at 40 km/h | 68 dB |
Difference between background and signal | 12.2 dB |
Dominant audio frequency | 2000 Hz |
Child seat anchors
Rating applies to 2021-25 models
Overall evaluation | + extra LATCH positions |
Vehicle trim | 2.5S |
Seat type | cloth |
This vehicle has 2 rear seating positions with complete child seat attachment (LATCH) hardware.
It has 1 additional seating position with a tether anchor and the ability to borrow lower anchors from the other seating positions.
Note: When anchors are borrowed, they aren't available to use in their designated positions.
Overall evaluation | + extra LATCH positions |
Vehicle trim | 2.5S |
Seat type | cloth |
G | Good |
A | Acceptable |
M | Marginal |
P | Poor |
Seating positions that rely on borrowed lower anchors or have only a tether anchor available are not rated. | |
thether anchor symbol | Tether anchor |
lower anchor symbol | Lower anchors |
Lower anchor(s) can be borrowed from adjacent positions(s) | |
No hardware available |
Details by seating position
1 | |
---|---|
Tether anchor | |
easy-to-find location | |
no other hardware could be confused for anchor | |
Lower anchors | |
not too deep in seat | |
not too much force needed to attach | |
easy to maneuver around anchors | |
2 | |
Tether anchor | |
easy-to-find location | |
no other hardware could be confused for anchor | |
Lower anchors | |
Can be borrowed from 1 and 3 | |
3 | |
Tether anchor | |
easy-to-find location | |
no other hardware could be confused for anchor | |
Lower anchors | |
not too deep in seat | |
not too much force needed to attach | |
easy to maneuver around anchors |
Seat position 21
Lower anchor A | |
---|---|
Open access rated | No |
Depth (cm) | 0-2 |
Force (lbs) | 7 |
Clearance angle (degrees) | 92 |
Lower anchor B | |
Open access rated | No |
Depth (cm) | 0-2 |
Force (lbs) | 12 |
Clearance angle (degrees) | 93 |
Tether anchor | |
Location | Rear deck |
Confusing hardware present | No |
Has contrasting label within 3 inches of tether anchor |
No |
Tether anchors can be accessed while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH |
Not measured |
Seat position 22
Lower anchor A | |
---|---|
Lower latch is shared for this seat position | |
Lower anchor B | |
Lower latch is shared for this seat position | |
Tether anchor | |
Location | Rear deck |
Confusing hardware present | No |
Has contrasting label within 3 inches of tether anchor |
No |
Tether anchors can be accessed while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH |
Not measured |
Seat position 23
Lower anchor A | |
---|---|
Open access rated | No |
Depth (cm) | 0-2 |
Force (lbs) | 9 |
Clearance angle (degrees) | 85 |
Lower anchor B | |
Open access rated | No |
Depth (cm) | 0-2 |
Force (lbs) | 8 |
Clearance angle (degrees) | 89 |
Tether anchor | |
Location | Rear deck |
Confusing hardware present | No |
Has contrasting label within 3 inches of tether anchor |
No |
Tether anchors can be accessed while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH |
Not measured |