The small overlap front evaluation consists of a driver-side and a passenger-side component.
If the results of the two evaluations differ, then the combined small overlap rating is equal to the lower rating.
The Subaru Forester was redesigned for the 2025 model year. Driver-side small overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of a 2025 Forester conducted by Subaru. These ratings do not apply to the Wilderness trim of the Forester.
Evaluation criteria
Rating
Overall driver-side evaluation
G
Structure and safety cage
G
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
G
Chest
G
Hip/thigh
G
Lower leg/foot
A
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics
G
Technical measurements for this test
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side
The Subaru Forester was redesigned for the 2025 model year. Passenger-side small overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of a 2025 Forester conducted by Subaru. These ratings do not apply to the Wilderness trim of the Forester.
Evaluation criteria
Rating
Overall passenger-side evaluation
G
Structure and safety cage
G
Passenger injury measures
Head/neck
G
Chest
G
Hip/thigh
G
Lower leg/foot
G
Passenger restraints and dummy kinematics
G
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
G
Chest
G
Hip/thigh
G
Lower leg/foot
G
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics
G
Technical measurements for this test
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on passenger side
The Subaru Forester was redesigned for the 2025 model year. These ratings do not apply to the Wilderness trim of the Forester.
Evaluation criteria
Rating
Overall evaluation
A
Structure and safety cage
G
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
G
Chest
G
Thigh/hip
G
Leg/foot
G
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics
G
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck
G
Chest
M
Thigh
G
Rear passenger restraints and dummy kinematics
G
View of the vehicle after the crash showing the airbags and damage to the occupant compartment.
The rear passenger dummy's head remained a safe distance from the front seatback.
Rear passenger dummy injury values indicate a low risk of injury to the head or neck and a moderate risk of injury to the chest. During the crash, the shoulder belt remained in an ideal position on the dummy’s chest.
The rear passenger dummy's lap belt remained in the ideal position on the pelvis.
Technical measurements for this test
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side
Evaluation criteria
Measurement
Test ID
CEF2452
Footwell intrusion
Footrest (cm)
6
Left (cm)
9
Center (cm)
12
Right (cm)
7
Brake pedal (cm)
5
Instrument panel rearward movement
Left (cm)
0
Right (cm)
0
Steering column movement
Upward (cm)
2
Rearward (cm)
-5
A-pillar rearward movement (cm)
0
Driver injury measures
Evaluation criteria
Measurement
Test ID
CEF2452
Head
HIC-15
131
Peak gs at hard contact
no contact
Neck
Tension (kN)
1.6
Extension bending moment (Nm)
16
Maximum Nij
0.26
Chest maximum compression (mm)
27
Femur (kN)
Left
1.0
Right
0.8
Knee displacement (mm)
Left
1
Right
2
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left
0
Right
0
Maximum tibia index
Left
0.69
Right
0.45
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left
2.0
Right
1.8
Foot acceleration (g)
Left
71
Right
81
Rear passenger injury measures
Test ID
CEF2452
Head
HIC-15 for head contact during forward excursion
no contact
Peak gs at hard contact
no contact
Neck
Tension (kN)
1.6
Compression (kN)
0.1
Maximum Nij for head contact during forward excursion
The Subaru Forester was redesigned for the 2025 model year. Side 2.0 ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of a 2025 Forester conducted by Subaru. These ratings do not apply to the Wilderness trim of the Forester.
Evaluation criteria
Rating
Overall evaluation
G
Structure and safety cage
A
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
G
Torso
G
Pelvis
G
Driver head protection
G
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck
G
Torso
G
Pelvis
G
Rear passenger head protection
G
Technical measurements for this test
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side
Evaluation criteria
Measurement
Test ID
VTS2415
B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver's seat (cm)
-17.0
Negative numbers indicate the amount by which the crush stopped short of the seat centerline.
Ratings are given for 2 different headlight variations available on this vehicle.
Trim level(s)
Base trim
Premium trim
Sport trim
Limited trim
Touring trim
Evaluation criteria
Rating
Low-beam headlight type
LED projector
High-beam headlight type
LED projector
Curve-adaptive?
Yes
High-beam assist?
Yes
Overall rating
G
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination:
Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was good in all 4 tests.
The low beams never exceeded glare limits.
High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was fair on the right side of the road and inadequate on the left side. On curves, visibility was good on the gradual left and both right curves and fair on the sharp left curve.
High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on the sharp left curve.
Technical measurements for this test
Evaluation criteria
Measurement
Trim level(s)
Base trim
Premium trim
Sport trim
Limited trim
Touring trim
Low-beam headlight type
LED projector
High-beam headlight type
LED projector
Curve-adaptive?
Yes
High-beam assist?
Yes
Overall rating Applies to 2025 models
G
LOW BEAMS
Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)
Amount glare exceeded threshold
Straightaway right edge
120.3 m
None
Straightaway left edge
67.7 m
None
250m radius right curve, right edge
90.6 m
None
250m radius left curve, left edge
77.2 m
None
150m radius right curve, right edge
75.5 m
None
150m radius left curve, left edge
57.7 m
None
HIGH BEAMS
Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)
Straightaway right edge
136.9 m
Straightaway left edge
124.9 m
250m radius right curve, right edge
83.9 m
250m radius left curve, left edge
86.9 m
150m radius right curve, right edge
73.1 m
150m radius left curve, left edge
63.6 m
Trim level(s)
Wilderness trim
Evaluation criteria
Rating
Low-beam headlight type
LED projector
High-beam headlight type
LED projector
Curve-adaptive?
Yes
High-beam assist?
Yes
Overall rating
G
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination:
Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was good on the sharp left and both right curves and fair on the gradual left curve.
The low beams never exceeded glare limits.
High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was fair on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was good in all 4 tests.
High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on both left curves.
Technical measurements for this test
Evaluation criteria
Measurement
Trim level(s)
Wilderness trim
Low-beam headlight type
LED projector
High-beam headlight type
LED projector
Curve-adaptive?
Yes
High-beam assist?
Yes
Overall rating Applies to 2022-25 models
G
LOW BEAMS
Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)
Amount glare exceeded threshold
Straightaway right edge
100.9 m
None
Straightaway left edge
61.5 m
None
250m radius right curve, right edge
90.2 m
None
250m radius left curve, left edge
58.8 m
None
150m radius right curve, right edge
71.7 m
None
150m radius left curve, left edge
57.3 m
None
HIGH BEAMS
Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux)
Ratings are given for 2 different systems available on this vehicle.
Rating applies to 2025 models
System details
standard EyeSight
of the following trim lines:
Base trim, Premium trim, Sport trim, Limited trim, Touring trim
Evaluation criteria
Rating
Overall evaluation
G
Includes high-beam assist credit
Crossing child — day
In the 12 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision.
In the 25 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision.
Crossing adult — night
In the 12 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision when using its high beams. When using its low beams, this vehicle avoided a collision.
In the 25 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision when using its high beams. When using its low beams, this vehicle avoided a collision.
Parallel adult — night
In the 25 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision when using its high beams. When using its low beams, impact speed was reduced by 12 mph.
In the 37 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision when using its high beams and a warning was issued 3.2 seconds before impact. When using its low beams, impact speed was reduced by 10 mph and a warning was issued 1.6 seconds before impact.
Rating applies to 2024-25 models
System details
standard EyeSight
of the following trim lines:
Wilderness trim
Evaluation criteria
Rating
Overall evaluation
G
Includes high-beam assist credit
Crossing child — day
In the 12 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision.
In the 25 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision.
Crossing adult — night
In the 12 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision when using its high beams. When using its low beams, this vehicle avoided a collision.
In the 25 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision when using its high beams. When using its low beams, this vehicle avoided a collision.
Parallel adult — night
In the 25 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision when using its high beams. When using its low beams, this vehicle failed to slow.
In the 37 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision when using its high beams and a warning was issued 3.4 seconds before impact. When using its low beams, impact speed was reduced by 1 mph and a warning was issued 2.7 seconds before impact.