Top Safety PickTop Safety Pick criteria

2024 Toyota Tundra

large pickup / Crew cab pickup

2024 Toyota Tundra Crew cab pickup
2023 Toyota Tundra shown

Crashworthiness

Rating overview
Small overlap front
Moderate overlap front: original test
Moderate overlap front: updated test
Side: updated test

Crash avoidance & mitigation

Headlights (varies by trim/option)
Front crash prevention: pedestrian
Standard system

Seat belts & child restraints

Seat belt reminders
LATCH ease of use

Other available safety features

  • Optional blind spot detection
  • Standard lane departure warning & prevention

Key

  • Good
  • Acceptable
  • Marginal
  • Poor

Small overlap front

The small overlap front evaluation consists of a driver-side and a passenger-side component. If the results of the two evaluations differ, then the combined small overlap rating is equal to the lower rating.

Driver-side

  • Rating applies to 2022-25 models

Tested vehicle: 2022 Toyota Tundra SR5 CrewMax 4wd

The Toyota Tundra Crew Cab was redesigned for the 2022 model year.

Overall driver-side evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Hip/thigh
Lower leg/foot
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics

Action shot taken during the driver-side small overlap frontal crash test.

The dummy's position in relation to the door frame, steering wheel, and instrument panel after the crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was maintained very well.

The frontal and side curtain airbags worked well together to keep the head from coming close to any stiff structure or outside objects that could cause injury.

The driver's space was maintained well, and risk of injuries to the dummy's legs and feet was low.

Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test ID CEN2203
Lower occupant compartment
Lower hinge pillar max (cm) 5
Footrest (cm) 9
Left toepan (cm) 8
Brake pedal (cm) 1
Parking brake (cm)
Rocker panel lateral average (cm) 1
Upper occupant compartment
Steering column 0
Upper hinge pillar max (cm) 5
Upper dash (cm) 7
Lower instrument panel (cm) 7

Driver injury measures

Test ID CEN2203
Head
HIC-15 173
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 1.7
Extension bending moment (Nm) 17
Maximum Nij 0.32
Chest maximum compression (mm) 25
Femur (kN)
Left 1.2
Right 1.2
Knee displacement (mm)
Left 4
Right 4
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left 0
Right 0
Maximum tibia index
Left 0.75
Right 0.42
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left 4.9
Right 2.4
Foot acceleration (g)
Left 122
Right 115

Passenger-side

  • Rating applies to 2022-25 models

Tested vehicle: 2022 Toyota Tundra CrewMax 4wd

The Toyota Tundra Crew Cab was redesigned for the 2022 model year. Passenger-side small overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of a 2022 Tundra Crew Cab conducted by Toyota.

Overall passenger-side evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Passenger injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Hip/thigh
Lower leg/foot
Passenger restraints and dummy kinematics
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Hip/thigh
Lower leg/foot
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics
Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on passenger side

Test ID VTP2206
Lower occupant compartment
Lower hinge pillar max (cm) 6
Footrest (cm) 16
Right toepan (cm) 16
Center toepan (cm) 13
Rocker panel lateral average (cm) 0
Upper occupant compartment
Center dash (cm) 4
Upper hinge pillar max (cm) 5
Upper dash (cm) 5
Right lower dash (cm) 5

Passenger injury measures

Test ID VTP2206
Head
HIC-15 287
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 1.6
Extension bending moment (Nm) 13
Maximum Nij 0.29
Chest maximum compression (mm) 18
Femur (kN)
Left 1.9
Right 2.4
Knee displacement (mm)
Left 5
Right 6
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left 0
Right 0
Maximum tibia index
Left 0.44
Right 0.55
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left 2.0
Right 4.2
Foot acceleration (g)
Left 88
Right 142

Driver injury measures

Test ID VTP2206
Head
HIC-15 170
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 1.3
Extension bending moment (Nm) 4
Maximum Nij 0.19
Chest maximum compression (mm) 31
Femur (kN)
Left 0.7
Right 0.7
Knee displacement (mm)
Left 1
Right 2
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left 0
Right 0
Maximum tibia index
Left 0.22
Right 0.23
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left 0.7
Right 0.3
Foot acceleration (g)
Left 36
Right 52

About the small overlap front test

Moderate overlap front: original test

Rating applies to 2022-24 models

Tested vehicle: 2022 Toyota Tundra SR5 CrewMax 4wd

The Toyota Tundra Crew Cab was redesigned for the 2022 model year. Moderate overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of a 2022 Tundra Crew Cab conducted by Toyota.

Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Leg/foot, left
Leg/foot, right
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics
Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test ID VTF2116
Footwell intrusion
Footrest (cm) 3
Left (cm) 8
Center (cm) 12
Right (cm) 15
Brake pedal (cm) 4
Instrument panel rearward movement
Left (cm) 1
Right (cm) 1
Steering column movement
Upward (cm) 4
Rearward (cm) 4
A-pillar rearward movement (cm) 0

Driver injury measures

Test ID VTF2116
Head
HIC-15 314
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 1.2
Extension bending moment (Nm) 12
Maximum Nij 0.19
Chest maximum compression (mm) 29
Legs
Femur force - left (kN) 1.1
Femur force - right (kN) 1.4
Knee displacement - left (mm) 2
Knee displacement - right (mm) 1
Maximum tibia index - left 0.30
Maximum tibia index - right 0.53
Tibia axial force - left (kN) 2.5
Tibia axial force - right (kN) 4.0
Foot acceleration (g)
Left 61
Right 79

About the original moderate overlap front test

Moderate overlap front: updated test

Rating applies to 2023-24 models

Tested vehicle: 2023 Toyota Tundra Limited CrewMax 4wd

The Toyota Tundra Crew Cab was redesigned for the 2022 model year.

Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Thigh/hip
Leg/foot
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck
Chest
Thigh
Rear passenger restraints and dummy kinematics

View of the vehicle after the crash showing the airbags and damage to the occupant compartment.

The rear passenger dummy's head remained a safe distance from the front seatback.

Rear passenger dummy injury values indicate a moderate risk of injury to the head or neck and chest. During the crash, the shoulder belt moved too far upward toward the dummy’s neck, compromising the effectiveness of the rear restraint system.

The rear passenger dummy's lap belt moved from the ideal position on the pelvis onto the abdomen, increasing the risk of abdominal injuries.

Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test ID CEF2318
Footwell intrusion
Footrest (cm) 4
Left (cm) 7
Center (cm) 11
Right (cm) 15
Brake pedal (cm) 1
Instrument panel rearward movement
Left (cm) 0
Right (cm) 0
Steering column movement
Upward (cm) 2
Rearward (cm) -1
A-pillar rearward movement (cm) 1

Driver injury measures

Test ID CEF2318
Head
HIC-15 149
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 1.3
Extension bending moment (Nm) 11
Maximum Nij 0.20
Chest maximum compression (mm) 29
Femur (kN)
Left 1.2
Right 2.6
Knee displacement (mm)
Left 3
Right 3
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left 0
Right 0
Maximum tibia index
Left 0.56
Right 0.95
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left 2.8
Right 5.6
Foot acceleration (g)
Left 56
Right 92

Rear passenger injury measures

Test ID CEF2318
Head
HIC-15 for head contact during forward excursion
no contact
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 2.2
Compression (kN) 0.2
Maximum Nij for head contact during forward excursion
no contact
Chest
Chest index 43
Shoulder belt tension (kN) 4.2
Thigh (kN)
Left femur compression 0.2
Right femur compression 0.2

About the moderate overlap front test

February 2024 adjustment to rating criteria

Side: updated test

Rating applies to 2022-25 models

Tested vehicle: 2022 Toyota Tundra SR5 CrewMax 4wd

The Toyota Tundra Crew Cab was redesigned for the 2022 model year. Side 2.0 ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of a 2022 Tundra Crew Cab conducted by Toyota.

Overall evaluation
Structure and safety cage
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
Torso
Pelvis
Driver head protection
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck
Torso
Pelvis
Rear passenger head protection
Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Test ID VTS2223
B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver's seat (cm) -22.0
Negative numbers indicate the amount by which the crush stopped short of the seat centerline.

Driver injury measures

Test ID VTS2223
Head
HIC-15 39
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 0.2
Compression (kN) 0.3
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm) 10
Lateral force (kN) 0.8
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm) 16
Average deflection (mm) 13
Maximum deflection rate (m/s) 2.13
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) 0.09
Pelvis
Combined force (kN) 2.2

Passenger injury measures

Test ID VTS2223
Head
HIC-15 51
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 0.2
Compression (kN) 0.6
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm) 11
Lateral force (kN) 0.8
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm) 6
Average deflection (mm) 4
Maximum deflection rate (m/s) 0.84
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) 0.02
Pelvis
Combined force (kN) 1.4

About the side crash test

Headlights

Ratings are given for 2 different headlight variations available on this vehicle.

Trim level(s)

  • Limited trim equipped with Premium package
  • Platinum trim
  • 1794 trim
  • TRD Pro trim
  • Capstone trim
Low-beam headlight typeLED projector
High-beam headlight typeLED projector
Curve-adaptive?No
High-beam assist?Yes
Overall rating
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination:
car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler 0 ft 100 ft 200 ft 300 ft 400 ft 500 ft 600 ft Low beams Optimal low-beam illumination High beams Optimal high-beam illumination High-beam assist credit Some glare

Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was good on both right curves, fair on the sharp left curve and inadequate on the gradual left curve.

The low beams created some glare.

High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was good on the gradual right curve, fair on the sharp right and gradual left curves, and inadequate on the sharp left curve.

High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on the straightaway and on both left curves.

Technical measurements for this test
Trim level(s)
  • Limited trim equipped with Premium package
  • Platinum trim
  • 1794 trim
  • TRD Pro trim
  • Capstone trim
Low-beam headlight type LED projector
High-beam headlight type LED projector
Curve-adaptive? No
High-beam assist? Yes
Overall rating
Applies to 2022-25 models
LOW BEAMS Average minimum useful
illumination distance (5 lux)		 Amount glare
exceeded threshold
Straightaway right edge 98.0 m None
Straightaway left edge 58.2 m None
250m radius right curve, right edge 74.1 m None
250m radius left curve, left edge 54.5 m 9.5%
150m radius right curve, right edge 60.1 m None
150m radius left curve, left edge 50.0 m 54.3%
HIGH BEAMS Average minimum useful
illumination distance (5 lux)
Straightaway right edge 164.8 m
Straightaway left edge 151.8 m
250m radius right curve, right edge 79.6 m
250m radius left curve, left edge 65.6 m
150m radius right curve, right edge 62.2 m
150m radius left curve, left edge 54.0 m

Trim level(s)

  • SR trim
  • SR5 trim
  • Limited trim
Low-beam headlight typeLED reflector
High-beam headlight typeLED reflector
Curve-adaptive?No
High-beam assist?Yes
Overall rating
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination:
car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler 0 ft 100 ft 200 ft 300 ft 400 ft 500 ft 600 ft Low beams Optimal low-beam illumination High beams Optimal high-beam illumination High-beam assist credit Some glare

Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the left side of the road and fair on the right side. On curves, visibility was good on the gradual right curve, fair on the sharp right and sharp left curves, and inadequate on the gradual left curve.

The low beams created some glare.

High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was fair in all 4 tests.

High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on the straightaway and all 4 curves.

Technical measurements for this test
Trim level(s)
  • SR trim
  • SR5 trim
  • Limited trim
Low-beam headlight type LED reflector
High-beam headlight type LED reflector
Curve-adaptive? No
High-beam assist? Yes
Overall rating
Applies to 2022-25 models
LOW BEAMS Average minimum useful
illumination distance (5 lux)		 Amount glare
exceeded threshold
Straightaway right edge 89.1 m None
Straightaway left edge 55.9 m None
250m radius right curve, right edge 67.1 m None
250m radius left curve, left edge 54.8 m 27.7%
150m radius right curve, right edge 54.3 m None
150m radius left curve, left edge 50.8 m 4.1%
HIGH BEAMS Average minimum useful
illumination distance (5 lux)
Straightaway right edge 145.3 m
Straightaway left edge 154.5 m
250m radius right curve, right edge 72.0 m
250m radius left curve, left edge 69.1 m
150m radius right curve, right edge 55.6 m
150m radius left curve, left edge 56.3 m

About the headlight evaluation

Front crash prevention: pedestrian

Rating applies to 2024-25 models

System details

  • standard Toyota Safety Sense 2.5: Pre-Collision System with Pedestrian Detection
  • of the following trim lines: SR trim, SR5 trim, Limited trim
Overall evaluation
Includes high-beam assist credit

Crossing child — day

  • In the 12 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision.
  • In the 25 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision.

Crossing adult — night

  • In the 12 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision when using its high beams. When using its low beams, this vehicle avoided a collision.
  • In the 25 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision when using its high beams. When using its low beams, this vehicle avoided a collision.

Parallel adult — night

  • In the 25 mph test, impact speed was reduced by 22 mph when using its high beams. When using its low beams, impact speed was reduced by 23 mph.
  • In the 37 mph test, impact speed was reduced by 31 mph when using its high beams and a warning was issued 1.6 seconds before impact. When using its low beams, impact speed was reduced by 12 mph and a warning was issued 0.7 seconds before impact.

About the pedestrian front crash prevention test

Seat belt reminders

Rating applies to 2022-25 models

Overall evaluation
Front row
Unbelted occupant alert (audible & visual)
Initiation time
DurationLong enough (90+ seconds)
Volume
Audio frequency
Second row
Startup status alert (visual)
Initiation time
Duration at least 60 seconds
Belt disengaged alert (audible & visual)
Initiation time
Duration at least 30 seconds
Volume
Audio frequency
Technical measurements for this test
Background cabin sound pressure level at 24 km/h 49 dB
Audible signal sound pressure level at 24 km/h 58 dB
Difference between background and signal 9.1 dB
Background cabin sound pressure level at 40 km/h 52 dB
Audible signal sound pressure level at 40 km/h 62 dB
Difference between background and signal 10.3 dB
Dominant audio frequency 800 Hz

About the seat belt reminder evaluation

Child seat anchors

Rating applies to 2023-25 models

Overall evaluation
Vehicle trimLimited CrewMax
Seat type leather

This vehicle has 2 rear seating positions with complete child seat attachment (LATCH) hardware.

It has 1 additional seating position with a tether anchor only.

Overall evaluation
Vehicle trimLimited CrewMax
Seat type leather
1 2 3
GGood
AAcceptable
MMarginal
PPoor
Seating positions that rely on borrowed lower anchors or have only a tether anchor available are not rated.
thether anchor symbol
Tether anchor
lower anchor symbol
Lower anchors
shared lower achors symbol
Lower anchor(s) can be borrowed from adjacent positions(s)
No hardware available

Details by seating position

1
Tether anchor
hard-to-find location
no other hardware could be confused for anchor
Lower anchors
too deep in seat
not too much force needed to attach
easy to maneuver around anchors
2
Tether anchor
hard-to-find location
no other hardware could be confused for anchor
Lower anchors
none available
3
Tether anchor
hard-to-find location
no other hardware could be confused for anchor
Lower anchors
too deep in seat
not too much force needed to attach
easy to maneuver around anchors
Technical measurements for this test

Seat position 21

3

Lower anchor A
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) 0-2
Force (lbs) 9
Clearance angle (degrees) 80
Lower anchor B
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) 2-4
Force (lbs) 10
Clearance angle (degrees) 73
Tether anchor
Location Middle seatback
Confusing hardware present No
Has contrasting label
within 3 inches of tether anchor		 Yes
Tether anchors can be accessed
while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH		 No

Seat position 22

2

Lower anchor A
No lower latch for this seat position
Lower anchor B
No lower latch for this seat position
Tether anchor
Location Middle seatback
Confusing hardware present No
Has contrasting label
within 3 inches of tether anchor		 Yes
Tether anchors can be accessed
while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH		 No

Seat position 23

1

Lower anchor A
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) 2-4
Force (lbs) 9
Clearance angle (degrees) 70
Lower anchor B
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) 0-2
Force (lbs) 12
Clearance angle (degrees) 78
Tether anchor
Location Middle seatback
Confusing hardware present No
Has contrasting label
within 3 inches of tether anchor		 Yes
Tether anchors can be accessed
while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH		 No

About the child seat anchor evaluation